stormwater rulemaking briefing n.
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 23

Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing. US Environmental Protection Agency. Overview. Regulatory framework Drivers for present rulemaking Rulemaking considerations Timeline Activities completed to date Activities in progress. Regulatory Framework.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing' - cissy

Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
stormwater rulemaking briefing

Stormwater RulemakingBriefing

US Environmental Protection Agency

  • Regulatory framework
  • Drivers for present rulemaking
  • Rulemaking considerations
  • Timeline
    • Activities completed to date
    • Activities in progress
regulatory framework
Regulatory Framework

1972: CWA amendments establish NPDES permit program.

Program does not include stormwater.

All “point” sources

“discharging pollutants”

into “waters of the U.S.”

Must obtain anNPDES permitfrom an authorized state or EPA

regulatory framework1
Regulatory Framework

1983: Nationwide Urban Runoff Program finds urban runoff a significant source of pollution

1987: CWA amendments direct EPA to regulate stormwater discharges under NPDES

  • Amendments recorded in section 402(p)
  • 402(p) establishes phased approach to stormwater permitting
regulatory framework2
Regulatory Framework

Section 402(p)(4)

Required EPA to establish permit application requirements for industrial and medium and large municipal separate storm sewer discharges

Section 402(p)(5)

Required EPA to conduct a study to identify other stormwater discharges, assess associated pollutant loads, and submit the results in a report to Congress.

Section 402(p)(6)

Provides authority for EPA to regulate other stormwater sources, based on the study, “to protect water quality”

regulatory framework3
Regulatory Framework

1990:EPA promulgates Phase I Stormwater Rules

1999: EPA promulgates Phase II Stormwater Rules

drivers of rulemaking
Drivers of Rulemaking
  • October 2008 National Research Council Report. EPA commissioned NRC to
    • Review its current permitting program for stormwater discharges under the CWA
    • Provide suggestions for improvement
  • May 2011 settlement in Fowler vs. EPA. Plaintiffs claimed EPA failed to take adequate measures to protect and restore the Chesapeake Bay.

NRC Stormwater Report Findings

  • Current approach unlikely to adequately control stormwater’s contribution to waterbody impairment
  • Requirements leave a great deal of discretion to dischargers to ensure compliance
  • Poor accountability and uncertain effectiveness
  • A more straightforward way to regulate stormwater contributions to waterbody impairment would be to use flow or a surrogate, like impervious cover, as a measure of stormwater pollutant loading

NRC Stormwater Report Findings

  • Efforts to reduce stormwater flow will automatically achieve reductions in pollutant loading
  • Flow is itself responsible for additional erosion and sedimentation that adversely impact surface water quality.
  • Stormwater control measures that harvest, infiltrate, and evapotranspirate stormwater are critical to reducing the volume and pollutant loading of small storms.

Fowler vs. EPA

  • EPA agreed to settlement with Chesapeake Bay Foundation and others in May 2011
  • “By September 30, 2011, EPA will propose a regulation under section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act to expand the universe of regulated stormwater discharges and to control, at a minimum, stormwater discharges from newly developed and redeveloped sites…EPA will take final action on the regulation by November 19, 2012.”

Rulemaking Considerations

  • Establishing substantive post-construction requirements for new and redevelopment
  • Expanding the universe of regulated discharges beyond the urbanized area
  • Addressing stormwater discharges from existing development through retrofitting
  • Establishing specific requirements for transportation
  • Establishing specific provisions for the Chesapeake Bay
post construction requirements
Post-Construction Requirements
  • Objective is to maintain or restore receiving water form and function by reducing pollutant loads and stream channel erosion
  • Preferred approach is to require post-construction hydrology to mimic natural hydrology
post construction requirements1
Post-Construction Requirements
  • Standard could include:
    • On-site retention of a certain size storm event determined by EPA
    • On-site retention of a certain size storm event determined by permitting authority
    • Other approach determined by permitting authority and consistent with objective
post construction requirements2
Post-Construction Requirements

EPA will consider

  • Whether the standard should be different for discharges from new development vs. redevelopment
  • What flexibility must be included to account for local variability, site constraints and water rights law
  • Whether unique standards be developed for transportation
defining regulated discharges
Defining Regulated Discharges
  • All discharges from new development and redevelopment of a certain size could be subject to a federal/state standard
  • Regulated MS4s could be required to apply the standard to applicable discharges to their system
  • Only discharges beyond the MS4 could be subject to a federal/state standard
  • Combination of the above
addressing discharges from existing development
Addressing Discharges from Existing Development

Retrofit requirements could:

  • Require MS4s to develop a retrofit implementation plan
  • Require the MS4s to implement the plan over a certain time period
specific provisions for the chesapeake bay
Specific Provisions for the Chesapeake Bay
  • EPA plans to include in this proposed rulemaking a separate section containing additional stormwater provisions for the Chesapeake Bay watershed
  • Over 64,000 square miles of land drain into the Chesapeake Bay or its tributaries
  • Major urban areas include:
    • Baltimore, MD - DC
    • Harrisburg, PA - Annapolis, MD
    • Richmond, VA
    • Hampton Roads, VA
activities completed to date
Activities Completed to Date
  • January – March 2010

Conducted five listening sessions and national webcast (2,000 participants)

  • August 2010

Distributed questionnaires to regulated MS4s, transportation-related MS4, unregulated MS4s, NPDES permitting authorities and owners of developed sites to gather information

activities completed to date1
Activities Completed to Date
  • September – November 2010

Conducted site visits with state and local stormwater managers, developers, engineers, and environmental advocates throughout the Northeast, Midwest, Southwest, Northwest and Southern California

  • October – November 2010

Conducted five listening sessions on Chesapeake Bay specific provisions

  • Monthly meetings with States
activities in progress
Activities in Progress
  • Benchmarking
  • Cost Benefit Analyses
  • Stormwater Calculator
  • Green Infrastructure Database
anticipated completion
Anticipated Completion
  • Proposal by September 30, 2011
  • Final action by November 19, 2012