1 / 17

Sea Level CCI Annual Review #1

Sea Level CCI Annual Review #1. WP2700 Coastal sea level corrections : Coastal Proximity Parameter Paolo Cipollini (NOC). Rationale.

cissy
Download Presentation

Sea Level CCI Annual Review #1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sea Level CCI Annual Review #1 • WP2700 Coastal sea level corrections : • Coastal Proximity Parameter Paolo Cipollini (NOC)

  2. Rationale • In order to determine how ‘close to the coast’ we can reach with climate-quality data, we need to screen data and corrections versus some independent variable • ‘Distance from coast’ is crude because it does not capture the enormous variability in 1) morphology and 2) coastal conditions distance from coast(km) Example: Elba Island, Tuscan Archipelago

  3. Coastal Proximity P • A new parameter to be used as independent variable • initially aim at capturing differences in coastal morphology • problem is well defined once geometry and instrumental params are fixed (orbital height, antenna beamwidth, pulse length, number of gates) and a good DEM is available • later, if possible, include peculiarities in coastal ocean (for instance peculiarities in coastal wave field) • more tentative • The P parameter is expected to improve screening (impact on the regional variability in coastal regions • with reference to distance from coast

  4. Defining P • increasing from ocean  land • smaller over tips/peninsulas, larger in bays • for easier comparison with distance (which is zero at coastline), P can be remapped: • -1 over open ocean • 0 at idealized, straight coastline • 1 inland P > 0 P = 0 P < 0

  5. Computing P - DEM • We need to simulate the effects of land on waveforms •  we fly a virtual altimeter over a DEM • Need a good DEM: ACE2 • ACE2 produced by De Montfort University using altimetry to correct (‘warp”) and integrate SRTM • available at various resolutions: we used the highest one • 3 arcmin, i.e.~90 m at equator

  6. example1: small tall island

  7. Computing P - two effects near land • power deficit due to “missing ocean” • land, even if it is at z=0, will usually have much lower backscatter than ocean (there are exceptions, but they are difficult to model!) • land returns in various gates depending on land elevation • i.e. we get echoes from land elements in various gates (before and after leading edge) depending on the land height

  8. example 2: flat straight coast Land z=0.001 Ocean

  9. example 2: “Dover cliff” Land z=100 Ocean

  10. Computing P - parameterise the two contributions We assume them to be independent and parameterise them as ‘worst cases’, and compute, gate by gate : • power deficit due to “missing ocean”: assume sigma0land=0 for this effect where nocean is the return from the ocean elements only; and nocean0 the return from ocean elements if there was no land at all • land returns in various gates depending on land elevation: assume sigma0land=sigma0oceanfor this effect where nlandis the return from the land elements only Finally we weight P1, P2by gate position, sum them and rescale them to [-1,1]

  11. example of P1,P2 and weighting

  12. Example of P

  13. Example of P

  14. Example of P Global map of P at 0.02° resolution (CoastalProximity_v1.nc) available on SL CCI FTP server

  15. Next steps • Refining P • account for peculiarities of coastal ocean, like wave field  variable spread for the gaussian weights based on wave models/wave climatology? • difficult to do it globally • Validating P • it is the independent variable – goes on the x axis • so we need to plot parameter errors, correction ‘errors’ or any equivalent cost functions against P • …and if needed, refine the algorithm to improve the effectiveness of the parameter in making errors monotonic and easy to put a threshold on

  16. Validating P Error or cost function LAND distance from coast coastal proximity P

  17. Comments/Suggestions Welcome!

More Related