1 / 30

Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges

Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges. Presented by: Jennifer Sellers, ODOT December 11, 2007. Overview of Water Quality Issues. Regulation of stormwater is a national issue Urbanization creating more degradation of in-stream habitat

cindy
Download Presentation

Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative:Meeting New Challenges Presented by: Jennifer Sellers, ODOT December 11, 2007

  2. Overview of Water Quality Issues • Regulation of stormwater is a national issue • Urbanization creating more degradation of in-stream habitat • Copper a problem in the Pacific Northwest

  3. Problem Statement Stormwater has become a major impediment to efficient ESA consultation process due to: • Changing criteria for effect determinations in ESA Section 7 consultations • Potential extension of the “action area” from the point of discharge to the sea

  4. Problem Statement Changing Criteria • ODOT has based effect determinations on the change between pre-project and post-project conditions • NMFS is basing effect determinations on the absolute quality of the stormwater at the point of discharge

  5. Changing Criteria: Implications to ODOT’s Program Region Biologists were surveyed and estimated a 20 – 50% increase in number of formal consultations

  6. Problem Statement Action Area Current ODOT Action Area Definition • 2-miles downstream from point of discharge or as project conditions indicate NMFS Proposed Action Area Definition • Look at on a project-by-project basis • Project team should coordinate with NMFS early to determine • Potentially from point of discharge to the ocean or major confluence

  7. Expanded Action Area Impact to ODOT’s Program • Consultation for projects in large areas of Regions 4 and 5 may be required

  8. Overall Impact to ODOT’s Program Nightmare Scenario • Required numeric standards • Monitoring to demonstrate compliance • Potential remediation requirements • Consultation gridlock

  9. Solution Strategy Collaborative approach that includes all of the interested parties • ODOT - USFWS • NMFS - ODFW • FHWA - EPA • DEQ

  10. Solution Strategy • A Technical Team comprised of hydraulic engineers and stormwater designers from ODOT, DEQ, and FHWA • ODOT Office of Maintenance • ODOT Environmental Leadership Team, Technical Leadership Team, and Area Managers Team

  11. Solution Strategy: ODOT’s Goals Develop a stormwater treatment program to: • Provide ODOT and FHWA with certainty regarding scope, schedule, and budget • Streamline the permitting process • Meet all regulatory needs • Result in an overall environmental benefit and promote species recovery

  12. Solution Strategy: ODOT’s Goals All solutions must be Permitable Constructible Maintainable

  13. Solution Strategy Twin tracks: • Technical: Develop the process and tools for effective stormwater management • Regulatory: Streamline the ESA consultation process

  14. Solution Strategy: Technical • Clarify and improve ODOT’s process for addressing stormwater management • Develop tools to select the most effective treatment for individual projects • Select design storms based on science

  15. Status: Technical Project Development Process • Planning for stormwater management early in project development • Incorporate Low Impact Development techniques whenever feasible • BMP and Design Storm Guidance being incorporated into ODOT Hydraulics Manual

  16. Status: Technical Design Guidance • BMP Summary Reports Completed • BMP Selection Tool being tested and refined on pilot projects • Draft rating of BMP effectiveness • Preferred BMPs identified • BMP Selection Tool Users’ Guide to be developed

  17. Status: Technical Design Guidance • Water Quality Design Storms have received regulatory acceptance • Flow Control Design Storm has an accepted upper limit, and lower limit is nearing acceptance

  18. Solution Strategy: Regulatory • Articulation and clarification of Effect Determination criteria and thresholds • Develop tools for Streamlined Permitting

  19. Solution Strategy: Regulatory Effects Determinations • Agree that copper causes sublethal effects to listed salmonids • NMFS develops guidelines for Effects Determinations based on project elements and stormwater management

  20. Solution Strategy: Regulatory Permitting Streamlining • Agree on requirements to obtain NMFS buyoff on projects • Develop programmatic approaches to consultation on stormwater issues • Include technical products in SLOPES IV • Use pilot projects using the technical products in consultation to set precedent

  21. Status: Regulatory • Agreement that if “effective” BMPs are used, then stormwater has been treated to maximum extent feasible • NMFS has provided written guidance for effect determinations • NMFS has presented a draft guidance on stormwater effects action area

  22. Status: Regulatory • Pilot projects selected, with active work on one in Region 1 • Proposal for a Stormwater Programmatic rejected • Incorporated preferred BMPs and Design Storms into SLOPES IV

  23. Status: Regulatory • For projects that cannot use SLOPES IV, stormwater analysis and conditions can be inserted into consultations via “incorporation by reference” • Investigating feasibility of a “SLOPES” with FHWA as the Action Agency

  24. Next Steps • Integration of stormwater management tools into ODOT’s project development process • Develop a Watershed Approach to Stormwater Management

  25. Future Steps: Watershed Approach • Treatment on small projects is often not cost effective • Some projects may not be able to meet water quality goals • Many permitted projects can have residual adverse effects • Highway runoff management may not address priority watershed goals

  26. Watershed Approach • Trading or banking of credits for small projects or projects that cannot meet water quality treatment goals • Mitigation for residual adverse effects from permitted projects • Focus efforts toward maximum benefit to the watershed

  27. Anticipated Benefits for FHWA and ODOT • Certainty in project development and construction • Reduction in project delays • Contributes to FHWA’s ESA Section 7(a)(1) requirements • Support of ODOT’s sustainability goals

  28. Anticipated Benefits for Regulatory Agencies • Regulatory requirements are met • ESA-listed fish and habitat are protected • Oregon’s water quality and wetland resources are protected • Well-defined permit conditions that allow for flexibility in application • Reduces staff workload

  29. Definition of Success • When guidance is approved by regulatory partners • When tools and guidance are in use by project teams • When stormwater is no longer a contentious issue

  30. Questions?

More Related