1 / 8

Evidence on the Impacts of Childhood Obesity Policy

Evidence on the Impacts of Childhood Obesity Policy. David Frisvold University of Iowa (Economics, Obesity Research and Educational Initiative, & Public Policy Center). Obesity in Perspective. 150 million adults are overweight or obese (78m are obese) in 2010

cindy
Download Presentation

Evidence on the Impacts of Childhood Obesity Policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evidence on the Impacts of Childhood Obesity Policy David Frisvold University of Iowa (Economics, Obesity Research and Educational Initiative, & Public Policy Center)

  2. Obesity in Perspective • 150 million adults are overweight or obese (78m are obese) in 2010 • 126 million adults voted in the 2012 presidential election • 63 million people attended church in a given weekend in 2010 • 23.5 million children are overweight or obese (12.5m are obese) in 2010 • The medical costs of obesity are $257 billion per year in 2010 $ • Sequestration reduced federal expenditures by $85 billion • Estimated costs from Hurricane Katrina are $148 billion • Consequences of high medical costs • Higher premiums for EPHI and higher taxes/reduction in benefits for Medicare and Medicaid • But the medical costs of obesity are due to costs as an adult • Does it makes sense to focus policy attention on children? • Obese children are highly likely to become obese adults • Difficult to reduce weight: <2% of obese adults were healthy weight 10 years later

  3. Overview of Public Policy Related to Obesity • Policies to reduce obesity • Improve diet through restrictions, taxes/subsidies, information, access • Increase physical activity through safe parks/built environment • Policies with an unintended consequence of contributing to obesity • Expansions of highways • School accountability/National School Lunch Program • This is not true for the SNAP program • Mixed results regarding cigarette taxes • Difficulties related to optimal policy design • Technological progress has contributed to the rise in obesity through cheaper food and more sedentary lifestyles • How to reduce obesity (and benefit society) without decreasing the benefits from technological progress

  4. Policies Targeting All Ages • Food pricing policies: Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages • Existing taxes on soft drinks reduce consumption of soft drinks but not total calories (b/c of substitutes) • Adolescents are most responsive • Can be implemented as an excise tax or by excluding SSBs as a food under the exemptions to sales taxes • MD: Food from grocery stores is exempt from sales tax, soft drinks are not “food” • Information-based policies: Calorie posting requirements • Reductions in calories purchased in some settings • No evidence for children or whether restaurants change menu content • Montgomery County: chains with 20 or more locations are required to post calorie counts • Nationwide requirements through the ACA

  5. Policies Targeting All Ages • Access: Food deserts • Studies document correlations between food deserts and obesity • Subsidies to encourage new grocery stores have not been effective in reducing obesity • Built environment • Studies of housing voucher lotteries demonstrate that the neighborhood environment effects obesity • Limited success with specific policies; an area that needs more research

  6. Policies Targeting Children • K-12 School-based policies • Restrictions on vending machines • Reduce soft drink consumption during school but not overall • Physical education requirements • Reduce obesity in elementary school (minutes per week requirements) but not high school • 100 minutes of required PE => 40 minutes of time spent in PE => 3.2 pct. point decrease in obesity. • MD: schools are required to offer PE, but there is no minimum amount required • These laws are not effective (equivalent to not having a law) • School meals • Minor changes to the design of the cafeteria can improve diet • Research is ongoing about changes to the breakfast program (expanding access, universally-free) • MD: requires breakfast in elementary schools (but does permit waivers), Maryland Meals for Achievement (universal breakfast)

  7. Policies Targeting Children • Early childhood education policies • Child care regulations • Require physical activity, limit TV, dietary restrictions • Research is ongoing • Head Start • Some evidence of a lasting reduction in obesity • Attending Head Start for a full day reduces obesity by 25% • Shows the promise of a comprehensive change to the environment for disadvantaged young children

  8. Two Takeaways from the Research Literature • Comprehensive policies are more effective than narrowly focused policies • Comprehensive policies are more expensive to implement but are more cost effective • Limited effectiveness of narrowly targeted policies • Policies targeting younger ages are more effective • In combination, substantial changes to the environment of young children can decrease childhood obesity rates

More Related