latin america apec funded medical device regulatory seminar l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Latin America APEC Funded Medical Device Regulatory Seminar PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Latin America APEC Funded Medical Device Regulatory Seminar

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 108
ciara

Latin America APEC Funded Medical Device Regulatory Seminar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

151 Views
Download Presentation
Latin America APEC Funded Medical Device Regulatory Seminar
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Latin America APEC Funded Medical Device Regulatory Seminar Study Group 2 Carmen Abad Luna Europe (Spain)

  2. VIGILANCE SYSTEM SOME PRACTICAL ISSUES

  3. VIGILANCE SYSTEM Vigilance System refers to: • Reporting • Register • Evaluation • Adoption of measures • Disseminating information About Medical Devices Adverse Events (In Europe, including recalls)

  4. MEDICAL DEVICE ADVERSE EVENT/RECALL Decision Process • Basic reporting criteria • Exemption Rules AE Reporting Guide

  5. REPORTING • Who? • What? • When? • To Whom? • What Language?

  6. WHO REPORTING? Manufacturer • the manufacturer, • its authorized representative or • any other person who is responsible for placing the device on the market • distributor? (National legislation) User (National Legislation)

  7. REPORTING BY DISTRIBUTOR Advantages • First informed about national events • Easy contact with the user involved • Exact information on device distribution Disadvantages • Poor information about product (design, manufacturing) • Lack of resources to investigating • Lack of information about similar events

  8. REPORTING BY USER Advantages • Second way to obtain information • Independent opinion • Real event relating Disadvantages • Ignorance on regulatory requirements • Conflict of interest • Many busy

  9. WHAT REPORTING? Reporting forms • Different for companies and users • Product Data • Manufacturer/authorized representative Data • Adverse Event Data: description, outcomes, health care facility • Investigation Data: results, actions • Distribution Data • Person reporting Data (user anonymity?)

  10. WHEN REPORTING?ADVERSE EVENTS TIMEFRAMES AE REPORTING GUIDE, but in Spain Immediately means immediately (relation possible or suspected) Experience on fatal cases where manufacturer not conclude on relation between device and adverse event until several months after Immediately Preventive measures are necessary

  11. WHEN REPORTING?RECALLS • At the moment/before to initiate it • Accompanying advisory notice • NCA possibility to modify it/authorize it

  12. TO WHOM REPORTING NATIONAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, in Europe to NCA where the event has occurred • Centralized/ Not centralized point to notify • Different ways to manufacturer/user reporting • Electronic/fax/mail/phone

  13. WHAT LANGUAGE? National Language, but English is accepted NCA must have the possibility to demand translation if necessary

  14. REGISTER NCA must organize and implement a register of adverse incidents that permits make a follow-up of them.

  15. EVALUATION • By the manufacturer • By the authority • Centralized (but regional authorities cooperation) • With the manufacturer • With the user • Expert opinion • Laboratory tests

  16. ADOPTION OF MEASURES (1) Manufacturer measures • No actions • Increase products follow up • Advisory notices • Corrective production actions (manufacturing) • Corrective products actions (market) • Recall

  17. ADOPTION OF MEASURES (2) Authority measures • No actions • More information (independent reports) • Recommendation to manufacturer (improve labelling) • Recommendation to user (safety notices) • Recommendation to patient (press release) • Restriction, prohibition of marketing (legal measures)

  18. DISSEMINATING OF INFORMATION • When? • To Whom? • What, what language?

  19. WHEN DISSEMINATING INFORMATION? When measures have been adopted by the manufacturer or by the authority

  20. TO WHOM DISSEMINATING INFORMATION? • To the international authorities (international network) • To the national authorities (national network) • To the healthcare facilities • To the distribution establishments • To the sales establishments (pharmacies)

  21. WHAT INFORMATION DISSEMINATING? • Form to exchange information (international network: GHTF) • Form to exchange information (national network) • Safety notes • Press release

  22. FORM TO EXCHANGE INFORMATION (NATIONAL NETWORK) • Product(s) • Reason • Actions to take/recommendations • Measures adopted (manufacturer/ authority) • Company advisory notice • Distributors data • Healthcare facilities data • Other (safety notice, press release)

  23. Study Group 2 (SG2)

  24. Overview of SG2

  25. Presentation Topics: Overview • Who We Are • Terms of Reference • Aim • Achievements • Vision • Document Map

  26. SG2 – Who We Are • 14 members • Half industry half regulators • Representing 3 regions • Europe • North America • Asia/Pacific

  27. SG2 Terms of Reference • Examine the requirements for the reporting of medical device adverse incidents involving medical devices, • Recommend ways to harmonize: • Reporting requirements of medical device adverse events • Post-market surveillance • Other forms of vigilance • Promote dissemination of relevant information

  28. Aim of GHTF SG2 • Improve protection of public health and safety of patients, users and others • Evaluate reports and disseminate information which may reduce the likelihood of or prevent repetition of adverse events • Define post market medical device reporting and surveillance requirements and guidelines on an international basis

  29. SG2 Achievements • Compared participating countries regulatory systems to determine a baseline for harmonization • Developed guidance for manufacturer reporting of adverse events • Developed an international system for exchange of high risk reports between competent authorities • Eleven Final Documents on Website

  30. SG2 Vision • Globally harmonized medical device adverse event reporting, vigilance, and post-market surveillance process

  31. Manufacturer or Authorised Representative Manufacturer’s Investigation Adverse Event N Report? N Complaint File Trend? ? Y Y (Report must be submitted) National Regulator (NCA) What Information? NCA Report? Within what timeframe? National Regulator Y To which NCA(s)? Other National Regulators “Map” of SG2 Guidance N36 N21, N31, (SG1, SG4) N32, ISO DTS 19218 N8 N9, N20 N33 N68 N38

  32. SG2 Publications • Vigilance (Adverse Event reporting by manufacturers to NCAs)* • SG2-N8: Guidance on How to Handle Information Concerning Vigilance Reporting Related to Medical Devices • SG2-N21: Adverse Event Reporting Guidance for the Medical Device Manufacturer or its Authorized Representative • SG2/N31: Proposal for Reporting of Use Errors with Medical Devices by their Manufacturer or Authorized Representative • SG2/N32: Universal Data Set for Manufacturer Adverse Event Reports • SG2-N36: Manufacturer's Trend Reporting of Adverse • SG2-N33: Timing of Adverse Event Reports • SG2-N68: Who Should Adverse Event Reports be Sent To? *See www.ghtf.org for latest revision

  33. SG2 Publications (cont’d) • NationalCompetent Authority Reports (Vigilance Exchange)* • SG2-N9: Global Medical Device Competent Authority Report • SG2-N20: National Competent Authority Report Exchange Criteria • SG2-N38: Application Requirements for Participation in the GHTF National Competent Authority Report Exchange Program. • Information* • SG2-N6: Comparison of the Device Adverse Reporting Systems in USA, Europe, Canada, Australia & Japan • SG2-N16: SG2 Charge & Mission Statement *See www.ghtf.org for latest revision

  34. Adverse Event Reporting

  35. Manufacturer’s Investigation Adverse Event N Report? N Complaint File Trend? ? Y Y (Report must be submitted) What Information? NCA Report? Within what timeframe? National Regulator Y To which NCA(s)? Other National Regulators N36 N21, N31, (SG1, SG4) N32, ISO DTS 19218 N8 N9, N20 N33 N68 N38

  36. Presentation Topics: AE Reporting • Adverse Event Reporting Guidance (N21) • Use Error (N31) • AE Trend Reporting (N36) • Reporting Timeframes (N33) • To Whom to Report (N68) • Report Data Set (N32)

  37. AE Reporting Guidance The objective of adverse event (AE) reporting and subsequent evaluations is to improve protection of the health and safety of patients, users and others by disseminating information which may: • reduce the likelihood of adverse events, or • prevent repetition of adverse events, or • alleviate consequences of such repetition.

  38. AE Reporting Guidance The term "manufacturer" means • the manufacturer, • its authorized representative or • any other person who is responsible for placing the device on the market

  39. AE Reporting Guidance The existing regulatory requirements of the participating countries involved in SG2 require medical device manufacturers to notify National Competent Authorities (NCAs) of certain adverse events.

  40. AE Reporting Guidance • The guidance document represents a global model, which provides guidance on the type of adverse events associated with medical devices that should be reported by manufacturers to a NCA. • It is based on the regulatory requirements existing in the participating member countries.

  41. AE Reporting Guidance • The guidance is not identical to current regulatory requirements. • The document provides a future model towards which existing systems should converge. • The principles laid down in the document should be considered in the development or amendment of regulatory systems in the participating countries or other countries.

  42. AE Reporting Guidance • Some NCAs also encourage reporting of adverse events by users. • The guidance document does not include requirements for user reporting. • It is recommended that NCAs promptly inform the pertinent manufacturers about reports received directly from users.

  43. AE Reporting Guidance • The act of reporting to a NCA is not considered an admission of manufacturer, user, or patient liability. • Submission of a report does not represent a conclusion by the manufacturer that the information is complete or confirmed. • A report is also not a conclusion that the medical device caused or contributed to the adverse event. • It is recommended that reports carry a disclaimer.

  44. AE Reporting Guidance • Any event which meets three basic reporting criteria is considered as an adverse event and should be reported to the relevant NCA. • Under specified conditions some types of events are exempt from reporting.

  45. AE Reporting Guidance • Basic reporting criteria: 1) An event must have occurred. • Malfunction or deterioration • Inadequate design or manufacture • Inaccuracy in labeling • Significant public health concern • Other information from testing or literature

  46. AE Reporting Guidance • Basic reporting criteria: 2) The manufacturer’s device is associated with the event. • Opinion from healthcare professional • Previous similar events • Other information available to the manufacturer

  47. AE Reporting Guidance • Basic reporting criteria: 3) The event led to one of the following: • Death of a patient, user or other person or • Serious injury of a patient, user or other person • No death or serious injury, but event might lead to death or serious injury if the event recurs

  48. AE Reporting Guidance Serious injury is defined as: • Life threatening illness or injury. • Permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure. • A condition requiring medical or surgical intervention to prevent permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure.

  49. AE Reporting Guidance • The term “permanent” means irreversible impairment or damage to a body structure or function, excluding minor impairment or damage. • Medical intervention is not in itself a serious injury. It is the reason that motivated the medical intervention that should be used to assess whether an event should be reported.

  50. AE Reporting Guidance • Reporting may be exempted if any one of a set of exemption rules is applicable. • However if a NCA requires reporting a specific type of event due to a significant public health concern, the exemption is no longer applicable. • Similarly those adverse events which are subject to an exemption become reportable to the NCA if a change in trend (usually an increase in frequency) or pattern is identified.