1 / 9

STAR Computer Based Testing Tryout

STAR Computer Based Testing Tryout. Jurupa Unified School District October 1-10, 2012. Grades Tested. Rubidoux High School Grades 10, 11 & 12 students who took End-of-Year Biology course in 2011-12 Van Buren Elementary School All grade 6 students who took grade 5 science CST in 2011-12.

chuong
Download Presentation

STAR Computer Based Testing Tryout

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STAR Computer Based Testing Tryout Jurupa Unified School District October 1-10, 2012

  2. Grades Tested • Rubidoux High School • Grades 10, 11 & 12 students who took End-of-Year Biology course in 2011-12 • Van Buren Elementary School • All grade 6 students who took grade 5 science CST in 2011-12

  3. The TEST • Two parts (30 items each part) • 23 item student survey after the test

  4. Test Item TypeSelected Response • Pros • Familiar and more traditional multiple choice true/false and yes/no answer selections • Option to highlight or strikethrough text or answer choices • Cons • In some cases, highlighter tool not working properly • Notes • Many students used striker to cross out incorrect choices

  5. Test Item Type Constructed Response/ Short Answer • Pros • Graphics/animation • Engaging • Produced a response by using the keyboard or dragging using a mouse • Cons • Students concerned about spelling/grammar • Notes • Most students were engaged and gave good effort to complete the test

  6. Test Item Type Technology Enhanced • Pros • Colorful graphics/animation • Students manipulate materials on the screen to understand the materials at a deeper level • Cons • Unclear directions • Notes • Students are not used to creating graphs on a computer • Students manipulated choices several times before submitting answers (like playing a game)

  7. Test Item TypePerformance Task • Simulations • Pros • Engaging and interesting • New and surprising • Graphics/animation kept students interested • Cons • Unclear directions for some parts (some parts had multiple items) • Notes • Students seemed to forget they were taking a test during this part

  8. Hardware/Software Matters • “Pause” test feature failed multiple times • Students had to log off/on to continue testing • Students could officially end the test without answering ALL questions (could not log back-in to finish) • Easy to navigate from question to question • Easy to see number items completed/incomplete

  9. Results • Percent scores were immediately available after each session • Scores were only viewable by grade, not by class or session

More Related