1 / 13

Encoding/Decoding of Arm Kinematics from Simultaneously Recorded MI Neurons

Encoding/Decoding of Arm Kinematics from Simultaneously Recorded MI Neurons. Y. Gao, E. Bienenstock, M. Black, S.Shoham, M.Serruya, J. Donoghue Brown Univ., Univ. of Utah Departments of Applied Mathematics Computer Science, and Neuroscience 63.3. Goals, Problems and Approaches. Goals

chuck
Download Presentation

Encoding/Decoding of Arm Kinematics from Simultaneously Recorded MI Neurons

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Encoding/Decoding of Arm Kinematics from Simultaneously Recorded MI Neurons Y. Gao, E. Bienenstock, M. Black, S.Shoham, M.Serruya, J. Donoghue Brown Univ., Univ. of Utah Departments of Applied Mathematics Computer Science, and Neuroscience 63.3

  2. Goals, Problems and Approaches • Goals • Investigate the nature of encoding in motor cortex • Optimally reconstruct hand trajectory from population activity to smoothly control a prosthetic robot arm • Problems • Need models of cells’ conditional firing • Need to deal with noisy, ambiguous, and sparse data • Need to make real time reconstruction (< 200ms delay) and cope with non-linear dynamics of hand motion • Approaches • Nonparametric models for encoding • Sound probabilistic framework for inference • Propagation of information over time using particle filtering

  3. Experiment A.10*10 matrix of electrodes B. Location of array in the MI arm area C. Illustration of implated array D. Continuous tracking task E. Typical trajectory L. Paninski, M. Fellows, N. Hatsopoulos, and J. Donoghue. Temporal tuning properties for hand position and velocity in motor cortical neurons. Submitted to J. Neurophysiology, 2001

  4. Modeling the Activity Cell 3 Cell 16 Cell 19 12 speed r (cm/s) 0 -p p angle (radians) • Empirical mean rate in non-overlapping 50ms bins, 100ms lag • Parametric models: cosine model (Georgopoulos et al ’86), Moran and Schwartz ’99 • Our approach: nonparametric model, permitting rigorous setting of parameters and comparison of methods, supporting higher-level analysis

  5. likelihood spatial prior Modeling the Activity For each velocity :observed mean firing rate, :true mean firing rate • Likelihood: Gaussian or Poisson • Spatial prior: Markov Random Field assumption, Gaussian or Robust prior: is a noisy realization of the

  6. Cosine Model Moran & Schwartz Model Gaussian & Gaussian Model Poisson& Robust Model

  7. Evaluation mean firing rate estimated from various models

  8. Evaluation • Quantitative comparison using log likelihood ratio (LLR) with cross-validation, Wilcoxon signed rank test for significance test • Comparing rate from various models to constant rate • Comparing rate from nonparametric models to parametric models

  9. ? Ambiguities. Temporal Inference Use the learned representation of hand motion to infer the motion of a monkey’s hand from neural activity. Model q r Need temporal integration.

  10. Temporal dynamics Bayesian Formulation Want to infer state of hand given the activity, Ct, of (~25 cells) up to time t. likelihood prior Poisson with conditional mean firing rate as a function of kinematics learned in encoding stage

  11. Method: Particle Filter non-Gaussian likelihood, non-linear temporal dynamics ---nonparametric approach Posterior sample Temporal dynamics sample Likelihood normalize Posterior Isard & Blake ‘96

  12. 1000 “Clone” Cells a. particle filtering b. linear regression vx: r2 = 0.8746, vx: r2 = 0.7735 vy: r2 = 0.9033 vy: r2 = 0.8096

  13. Conclusions • Non-parametric model of neural activity in MI • * probabilistic relationship between neural activity and events in the world. • * superior to previous methods • Introduced particle filtering for the Bayesian inference of hand motion in non-overlapping 50 ms intervals • * non-Gaussian likelihood and non-linear dynamics • * supports more sophisticated analysis • Acknowledgements: This work is supported by Keck Foundation grant #R01 NS25074, the NIH #N01-NS-9-2322, and NSF ITR #0113679.

More Related