E N D
1. SJFD 1
2. SJFD 2 San Jose, A City In Transition
3. SJFD 3 SJFD Strategic Plan SJFD – a willing department
Determine appropriate standards and performance goals
Evaluate current emergency response capabilities
Identify current and future resource needs
4. SJFD 4 Need for the Strategic Plan Challenged by city growth
Call volume growth rate of 3%/yr
Changing expectations (EMS, hazmat)
Identify influences on service demand
Choose to change and identify strategies
Implement change and measure outcomes
5. SJFD 5 Previous and Current Planning Efforts Paramedic program feasibility study
Communications center study
Information technology study
Revised apparatus replacement policy
Training facilities and programs study
Investing in Results
6. SJFD 6 Who’s Developing the Plan A project partnership of:
City, SJFD Strategic Plan Steering Committee
Emergency service consultants
Statisticians
Fire chief officers
Computer modeling software
The plan is a living document
7. SJFD 7 Project Approach Utilize department expertise
Build on previous work
Perform extensive research, quantitative and qualitative analysis
Use multi-discipline perspective
Use professional accreditation tools
Leverage Investing in Results data
8. SJFD 8 Service Types
Core Services
Field emergency services
Strategic Support
Maintain field units like training & supply
9. SJFD 9 Summary of Findings Not all areas served within established performance goals
Inadequate strategic support
Overburdened and backlogged fire code inspection programs
Inadequate public education & involvement
10. SJFD 10 Quantitative Analysis Dispatch data analysis
Descriptive statistics
Relational statistics
Computer modeling
Medical complaint clusters
Comparative data
200 cities survey
ICMA performance measures data
Deccan software
Comprehensive analysis of CAD data
Resource location modeling tool
11. SJFD 11 Qualitative Analysis Station logs
Personnel interviews
Literature/on-line searches
Document review
Supplemental Analysis
Information systems
Communications
Traffic patterns Ty and GeoffTy and Geoff
12. SJFD 12 Performance Standards No national standard (or consensus!)
Insurance Services Office (ISO)–outdated
FS accreditation–Standards of Cover
American Heart Association–clinical
CA EMS System Standards and Guidelines
County ambulance contract
NFPA 1710 - review draft proposal
Need comprehensive systems approach
Need for local control
13. SJFD 13 Desired Outcomes Need to set reasonable expectations
Fire – control fire spread to room of origin
EMS – intervene prior to brain death
Wildland – control to area of origin
Hazmat & special risk – stop escalation of the emergency
14. SJFD 14 Risk Identification Quantification of risk using RHAVE assessment
Risk as % of total area:
Maximum risk 5% (Hosp., Airport, high rise)
Major risk 19% (Strip malls, mixed use)
Typical risk 63% (Single family, grocery)
Low risk 13% (Out-buildings, parks)
Identification of medical risk
15. Fire Riskusing RHAVE
17. SJFD 17 Performance Measures Work backward from desired outcomes to design system
Customer’s viewpoint–total reflex time
Travel time as a component
Cover all risk categories
Nine specific measures
Basis for deployment analysis
18. SJFD 18 Total Reflex Time Call Processing - Receipt to dispatch
Turnout - Dispatch to en route
Travel - Station to emergency scene (most vulnerable)
Curb to customer (currently not measured)
19. SJFD 19 Performance Goals Design response system backwards from the expected outcome, by risk category
SJFD common elements:
Emphasis on total reflex time
First Due: 8 min. total reflex (4 min. travel)
Second Due: 10 min. total reflex (6 min. travel)
Third Due: 13 min. total reflex (9 min. travel)
Stop escalation of emergency where found… Stew/Geoff
Define total reflex and compare to EMDAC description of “response time”Stew/Geoff
Define total reflex and compare to EMDAC description of “response time”
20. SJFD 20 Performance Example Serious Structure Fire - Typical Risk:
Goal:
An effective response force of 23 personnel deployed via three fire engines, one truck company, one USAR company and one battalion chief shall respond.
Measure:
The first unit shall arrive within 4 minutes travel and 8 minutes total reflex time. The second due engine and truck company shall arrive within 6 minutes travel and 10 minutes total reflex time. The third due engine and battalion chief shall arrive within 9 minutes travel and 13 minutes total reflex time. The USAR unit shall arrive within 11 minutes travel and 15 minutes total reflex time.
Performance Objective:
To stop the escalation of a serious fire where found. Stew/Geoff
Define total reflex and compare to EMDAC description of “response time”Stew/Geoff
Define total reflex and compare to EMDAC description of “response time”
21. SJFD 21 Performance Example Emergency Medical - Typical Risk:
Goal:
An effective response force of four (4) personnel deployed via one fire engine or one Truck Company shall respond.
Measure:
The unit shall arrive within eight minutes (8:00) total reflex time, 80% of the time.
Performance Objective:
To stop the escalation of a medical emergency where found. This typically means providing advanced life support and or minor rescue as necessary for one to three patients.
Stew/Geoff
Define total reflex and compare to EMDAC description of “response time”Stew/Geoff
Define total reflex and compare to EMDAC description of “response time”
22. SJFD 22 Deployment Statistics Reviewed two years of dispatch data (97/98, 98/99)
Computerized analysis of simultaneous call demand
Developed forecasting technique to identify performance thresholds
26. SJFD 26 Distribution Not all areas served by first due unit within performance targets
Simultaneous incidents
Units unavailable
Topographical
Distance
27. SJFD 27
28. SJFD 28
29. SJFD 29
30. SJFD 30
31. SJFD 31
32. SJFD 32 Concentration Truck coverage
Traffic congestion
Risk specific
36. SJFD 36 Developed Areas Berryessa area
Blossom Hill/IBM
Edenvale
South Willow Glen/Communication Hill
North SJ, (south & southeast of Alviso)
Silver Creek/Yerba Buena
Almaden Valley
37. SJFD 37 Undeveloped Growth Areas North Coyote Valley (industrial)
Mid Coyote Valley (high-density residential)
Communications Hill (high-density residential)
South Almaden Urban Reserve (residential)
38. SJFD 38 Core Services Findings Suppression & EMS
Not all areas served within performance goals
Lost capacity affects performance
External influences reduce performance
Fire & Life Safety Education
Prevention, PAD, corporate response
39. SJFD 39 Core Services Findings Fire Safety Code Compliance
Inspections
Life Safety & building code improvements
40. SJFD 40 Strategic Support Findings Inadequate analytical support
Under-utilized education technology
Inefficient training delivery procedures
Inefficient maintenance procedures
No stocked reserve apparatus
No mobile mechanic
No after hours service
Inefficient distribution of emergency supplies and equipment GeoffGeoff
41. SJFD 41 Strategic Support Findings (cont’d) Opportunity to improve unit availability
Dispatch (public assist prioritization)
Maintenance (apparatus, equipment)
Inspections (backlogs, out of position)
Training (apparatus, instructors, out of position) GeoffGeoff
42. SJFD 42 Recommendations(Immediate & short-term)* 1. Change strategic support systems
Modify maintenance, stores, training, dispatch
2. New CAD, RMS, and other technology
3. Expand traffic preemption system
4. Prioritize requests for service
5. Add analytical & other support staff
6. Part-time crews at peak workload
43. SJFD 43 Recommendations(Immediate & short-term) 7. Back-fill company training with overtime companies
8. Targeted public access defibrillation
9. Fleet upgrade
* Measure effects of recommendations (perform pilot studies of proposed solutions before city-wide implementation)
44. SJFD 44 Recommendations(next steps) 1. Use quints to improve truck coverage
2. Relocate stations and/or resources to improve distribution
3. Add stations, companies, and support staff to meet increasing service demands
4. Continue to explore additional resource needs (e.g., bulldozers, helicopter)
5. Improved training facilities and programs
* Continue to measure and evaluate
45. SJFD 45 Relocation Candidates Station 8 (small, poor location)
Station 9 (poor location)
Stations 12, 17, 23 and 25 (poor locations, temporary facilities)
Station 21 (temporary facility)
46. SJFD 46 Expected Outcomes Improved response time performance and efficiency
Improved data gathering, analysis and understanding of factors impacting service delivery
Improved accountability and reporting capabilities
47. SJFD 47 The Future Community partnership
Customer serviceoriented
All-risk mission
Data-driven
Innovation
48. SJFD 48