1 / 6

CHURCHLAND 2

CHURCHLAND 2. ELIMINATIVE MATERIALISM Or NO MIND, JUST BRAIN. The brain speaks up for itself…. ELIMINATIVE MATERIALISM. CENTRAL THESES 1. MIND is unreal A Folk-Psychological concept SO beliefs, desires, pains, perceptions, thoughts, volitions, etc., unreal 2. Only BRAIN is real

Download Presentation

CHURCHLAND 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CHURCHLAND 2 ELIMINATIVE MATERIALISM Or NO MIND, JUST BRAIN

  2. The brain speaks up for itself….

  3. ELIMINATIVE MATERIALISM CENTRAL THESES 1. MIND is unreal A Folk-Psychological concept SO beliefs, desires, pains, perceptions, thoughts, volitions, etc., unreal 2. Only BRAIN is real SO brain states, processes, inputs, outputs, etc., are real

  4. SCIENTIFIC PARALLELS (313-14) Some folk-concepts: witches, demonic possession Some early scientific concepts: caloric, phlogiston, heavenly spheres, élan vital, electromagnetic ether, absolute velocity, etc.

  5. Arguments for Eliminative Materialism (314-16) 1. Folk-psychology [Folk-Ψ] is bad and stagnant theory 2. Folk-physics, folk-biology, etc. were wrong, so is Folk-Ψ 3. Elimination is more probable a priori than reduction

  6. Arguments against Eliminative Materialism (316-17) 1. Introspection shows reality of beliefs, desires, pains, etc. 2. If beliefs are unreal, one cannot believe Eliminative Materialism 3. Folk-Ψ is not so bad [& neuroscience not that good]

More Related