1 / 1

United States Claims Chart for Compromises in Partnership Proceedings

This chart outlines the acceptance or rejection criteria for claims on behalf of the United States, excluding refund suits involving income, estate, or gift taxes. It includes compromises in partnership proceedings exceeding $2 million in Government concessions. The roles of Civil Chief, Associate AG, AAG Office of Review, DAAG for Review, and IRS Chief Counsel1 are defined. Recommendations from Chief Counsel are necessary for full concessions, except in certain cases.

chione
Download Presentation

United States Claims Chart for Compromises in Partnership Proceedings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reject Accept This chart applies to claims on behalf of the United States (non-refund suits) and claims against the United States other than refund suits involving income, estate or gift taxes; includes compromises in § 6226 Partnership Proceedings, where the Government concession exceeds $2 million. Yes CivilChief Yes/No Associate AG Yes Yes AAG Office of Review Yes/No DAAG for Review Yes/No IRS Chief Counsel1 Yes No No No CivilChief No 1The Chief Counsel’s recommendation is not required in SOP cases that are compromised. However, when full concession of an issue or a case is proposed, the Trial Attorney must obtain a recommendation from Chief Counsel, except in cases involving liability under IRC § 6672.

More Related