mediating between causes and probabilities the use of graphical models in econometrics n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Mediating Between Causes and Probabilities: the Use of Graphical Models in Econometrics PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Mediating Between Causes and Probabilities: the Use of Graphical Models in Econometrics

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 14

Mediating Between Causes and Probabilities: the Use of Graphical Models in Econometrics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 67 Views
  • Uploaded on

Alessio Moneta Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, and Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa https://mail.sssup.it/~amoneta 16 June 2006 Causality and Probability in the Sciences University of Kent.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Mediating Between Causes and Probabilities: the Use of Graphical Models in Econometrics' - chiku


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
mediating between causes and probabilities the use of graphical models in econometrics

Alessio Moneta

Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, and

Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa

https://mail.sssup.it/~amoneta

16 June 2006

Causality and Probability in the Sciences

University of Kent

Mediating Between Causes and Probabilities: the Use of Graphical Models in Econometrics
outline
Outline

1. Causal inference in macro-econometrics

2. Graphical models

3. Graphical models and structural Vector Autoregressions

causal inference in macro econometrics
Causal inference in macro-econometrics
  • Macro-econometric model:

Structural form:

A0 Yt + A1 Yt-1 + … + Am Yt-m + B0 Xt + B1 Xt-1 + … + Bn Xt-n = εt

Yt : vector of endogenous variables

Xt : vector of exogenous variables

Reduced form:

Yt = P1 Yt-1 + … + Pm Yt-m + Q0 Xt + … + Qn Xt-n + ut,

where Pi = -A0-1 Ai, Qi = -A0-1 Bi, and ut = A0-1 εt

causal inference in macro econometrics1
Causal inference in macro-econometrics
  • Problem of identification
  • Underdetermination of theory by data
  • Formalization of the problem of identification by Haavelmo (1944)
deductivist approaches
Deductivist approaches
  • Cowles Commission approach: a priori restrictions dictated by “Keynesian macroeconomics”
  • Lucas Critique (1976): the causal relations identified by the Cowles Commission are not stable (invariant under intervention)
  • Rational expectations econometrics
  • Calibration approach (Kydland – Prescott 1982)
  • Problems with deductivist approaches
inductivist approaches
Inductivist approaches
  • Sims’s (1980) Vector Autoregressions:

Yt = P1 Yt-1 + … + Pm Yt-m + ut

  • Let us the data speak, “without pretending to have too much a priori theory”
  • Analysis of the effects of shocks on key variables (impulse response functions)
  • Structural VAR:

A0 Yt = A1 Yt-1 + … + Am Yt-m + εt

where Pi = -A0-1 Ai, and ut = A0-1 εt

  • Problem of identification once again.
inductivist approaches1
Inductivist approaches
  • Granger Causality (1969, 1980). xt causes yt iff:

P(yt \yt-1,yt-2 ,… , xt-1,xt-2 ,…,Ω) ≠P(yt \yt-1,yt-2 ,… ,Ω)

  • Probabilistic conception of causality: xt causes yt if xt renders yt more likely.
  • Similarities between Suppes’s (1970) and Granger’s account
  • Shortcomings of probabilistic accounts of causality
graphical causal models
Graphical causal models
  • A graphical causal model (Spirtes et al. 2000) is a graph whose nodes are random variables with a joint probability distribution subject to some restrictions. These restrictions concern the type of connections between causal relations and conditional independence relations.
  • The simplest graphical causal model is the causal DAG. A causal DAG G is a directed acyclic graph whose nodes are random variables with a joint probability distribution P subject to the following condition:
  • Markov Condition: each variable is independent of its graphical non-descendants conditional on its graphical parents.
causal dag
Causal DAG
  • Faithfulness condition: each independence condition is entailed by the Markov condition.
  • Stability
beyond dags
Beyond DAGs
  • Feedbacks (Richardson and Spirtes 1999);
  • Latent variables;
  • Non-linearity;
  • Graphical models for time series.
graphical causal models1
Graphical causal models
  • Logic of scientific discovery?
  • Causal Markov Condition and Faithfulness condition are general a priori assumptions
  • Using output of search algorithm + background knowledge to test single causal hypotheses.
  • Synthetic approach (Williamson 2003).
graphical models for structural var
Graphical models for Structural VAR
  • Recovering structural analysis in VAR models (Swanson and Granger 1997, Bessler and Lee 2002, Demiralp and Hoover 2003, Moneta 2003).
  • Procedure to identify the causal structure of VAR models using graphical models.
  • This procedure uses a graphical algorithm (modified version of the PC algorithm of Spirtes-Glymour-Scheines 2000) to infer the contemporaneous causal structure starting from the analysis of the partial correlations among VAR residuals.
empirical example
Empirical example
  • VAR model in which Y = (C, I, M, Y, R, ΔP)’ quarterly US data 1947:2 – 1994:1
  • Output of the search algorithm:
  • The output of the algorithm consists of 24 DAGs
  • Testing the output of the algorithms: 8 DAGs are excluded
  • Incorporating background knowledge
  • Sensitivity analysis
conclusions
Conclusions
  • Mediating between deductivist and inductivist approaches
  • Causal Markov Condition and Faithfulness Condition as working assumptions
  • Importance of background knowledge and deductive side of causal inference
  • Giving background knowledge an explicit causal language
  • Possibility of testing background knowledge
  • Under-determination problem and sensitivity analysis