slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
hadrons

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 22

hadrons - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 137 Views
  • Uploaded on

. The Hadronic Contribution to ( g – 2) . Michel Davier Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire, Orsay. Tau Workshop 2004 September 1 4 - 17 , 2004, Nara , Japan. . . . hadrons. [email protected] Magnetic Anomaly. QED. QED Prediction:

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'hadrons' - chika


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

The Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

Michel Davier

Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire, Orsay

Tau Workshop 2004

September 14 - 17, 2004, Nara, Japan

hadrons

[email protected]

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide2
Magnetic Anomaly

QED

QED Prediction:

Computed up to 4th order [Kinoshita et al.] (5th order estimated)

Schwinger 1948

QED

Hadronic

Weak

SUSY...

... or other new physics ?

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide3
Why Do We Need to Know it so Precisely?

Experimental progress on precision of (g–2)

Outperforms theory pre-cision on hadronic contribution

BNL (2004)

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide4
The Muonic (g–2)

Contributions to the Standard Model (SM) Prediction:

Dominant uncertainty from lowest order hadronic piece. Cannot be calculated from QCD (“first principles”) – but:we can use experiment (!)

The Situation 1995

had

”Dispersion relation“

had

...

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide5
Hadronic Vacuum Polarization

Define: photon vacuum polarization function (q2)

Ward identities: only vacuum polarization modifies electron charge

with:

Leptonic lep(s) calculable in QED. However, quark loops are modified by long-distance hadronic physics, cannot (yet) be calculated within QCD (!)

Way out: Optical Theorem (unitarity) ...

... and the subtracted dispersion relation of (q2) (analyticity)

Im[ ]  | hadrons |2

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

... and equivalently for a [had]

slide6
Improved Determination of the Hadronic Contribution to (g–2) and (MZ )

2

Eidelman-Jegerlehner’95, Z.Phys. C67 (1995) 585

  • Since then: Improved determi-nation of the dispersion integral:
    • better data
    • extended use of QCD
  • Inclusion of precise  data using SU(2) (CVC)

Alemany-Davier-Höcker’97, Narison’01, Trocóniz-Ynduráin’01, + later works

  • Extended use of (dominantly) perturbative QCD

Martin-Zeppenfeld’95, Davier-Höcker’97, Kühn-Steinhauser’98, Erler’98, + others

Improvement in 4 Steps:

  • Theoretical constraints from QCD sum rules and use of Adler function

Groote-Körner-Schilcher-Nasrallah’98, Davier-Höcker’98, Martin-Outhwaite-Ryskin’00, Cvetič-Lee-Schmidt’01, Jegerlehner et al’00, Dorokhov’04 + others

  • Better data for the e+e–  +– cross section

CMD-2’02, KLOE’04

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide7
The Role of Data through CVC – SU(2)

W: I=1 &V,A

CVC: I=1 &V

: I=0,1 &V



e+

hadrons

W

e–

hadrons

Hadronic physics factorizes inSpectral Functions :

fundamental ingredient relating long distance (resonances) to short distance description (QCD)

Isospin symmetry connects I=1 e+e– cross section to vectorspectral functions:

branching fractionsmass spectrum kinematic factor (PS)

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide8
SU(2) Breaking

Electromagnetism does not respect isospin and hence we have to consider isospin breaking when dealing with an experimental precision of 0.5%

  • Corrections for SU(2) breaking applied to  data for dominant  – + contrib.:
    • Electroweak radiative corrections:
      • dominant contribution from short distance correction SEW to effective 4-fermion coupling  (1 + 3(m)/4)(1+2Q)log(MZ /m)
      • subleading corrections calculated and small
      • long distance radiative correction GEM(s) calculated [ add FSR to the bare cross section in order to obtain  – + () ]
    • Charged/neutral mass splitting:
      • m–  m0leads to phase space (cross sec.) and width (FF) corrections
      • - mixing (EM    – + decay)corrected using FF model
      • intrinsic m–  m0 and –  0 [not corrected !]
    • Electromagnetic decays, like:     ,    ,    ,   l+l –
    • Quark mass difference mu  mdgenerating “second class currents” (negligible)

Marciano-Sirlin’ 88

Braaten-Li’ 90

Cirigliano-Ecker-Neufeld’ 02

Alemany-Davier-Höcker’ 97, Czyż-Kühn’ 01

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide9
Mass Dependence of SU(2) Breaking

Multiplicative SU(2) corrections applied to –   – 0 spectral function:

Only  3 and EW short-distance corrections applied to 4 spectral functions

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide10
e+e–Radiative Corrections

Multiple radiative corrections are applied on measured e+e– cross sections

  • Situation often unclear: whether or not and if - which corrections were applied
    • Vacuum polarization (VP) in the photon propagator:
      • leptonic VP in general corrected for
      • hadronic VP correction not applied, but for CMD-2 (in principle: iterative proc.)
  • Initial state radiation (ISR)
    • corrected by experiments
  • Final state radiation (FSR) [we need e+e–  hadrons () in disper-sion integral]
    • usually, experiments obtain bare cross section so that FSR has to be added “by hand”; done for CMD-2, (supposedly) not done for others

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide11
2002/2003 Analyses of ahad
  • Motivation for new work:
    • New high precision e+e– results (0.6% sys. error) around  from CMD-2 (Novosibirsk)
    • New results from ALEPH using full LEP1 statistics
    • New R results from BES between 2 and 5 GeV
    • New theoretical analysis of SU(2) breaking

CMD-2 PL B527, 161 (2002)

ALEPH CONF 2002-19

BES PRL 84 594 (2000); PRL 88, 101802 (2002)

Cirigliano-Ecker-Neufeld

JHEP 0208 (2002) 002

  • Outline of the 2002/2003 analyses:
    • Include all new Novisibirsk (CMD-2, SND) and ALEPH data
    • Apply (revisited) SU(2)-breaking corrections to data
    • Identify application/non-application of radiative corrections
    • Recompute all exclusive, inclusive and QCD contributions to dispersion integral; revisit threshold contribution and resonances
    • Results, comparisons, discussions...

Davier-Eidelman-Höcker-Zhang

Eur.Phys.J. C27 (2003) 497; C31 (2003) 503

Hagiwara-Martin-Nomura-Teubner, Phys.Rev. D69 (2004) 093003 (no  data)

Jegerlehner,

hep-ph/0312372 (no  data)

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide12
Comparing e+e–  +– and –0

Correct  data for missing - mixing (taken from BW fit) and all other SU(2)-breaking sources

Remarkable agreement

But: not good enough...

...

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide13
The Problem

Relative difference between  and e+e– data:

zoom

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide14
––0: Comparing ALEPH, CLEO, OPAL

Shape comparison only. SFs normalized to WA branching fraction (dominated by ALEPH).

  • Good agreement observed between ALEPH and CLEO
  • ALEPH more precise at low s
  • CLEO better at high s

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide15
Testing CVC

Infer branching fractions from e+e– data:

Difference: BR[ ] – BR[e+e– (CVC)]:

leaving out CMD-2 :

B0 = (23.69  0.68) %

 (7.4  2.9) % relative discrepancy!

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide16
New Precise e+e–+– Data from KLOE Using the „Radiative Return“

Overall: agreement with CMD-2

Some discrepancy on  peak and above ...

...

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide17
The Problem (revisited)

Relative difference between  and e+e– data:

zoom

No correction for ± –0 mass (~ 2.3 ± 0.8 MeV) and width (~ 3 MeV) splitting applied

Davier, hep-ex/0312064

Jegerlehner, hep-ph/0312372

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide18
Evaluating the Dispersion Integral

use data

Agreement bet-ween Data (BES) and pQCD (within correlated systematic errors)

use QCD

Better agreement between exclusive and inclusive (2) data than in 1997-1998 analyses

use QCD

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide19
Results: the Compilation (including KLOE) Contributions to ahad[in 10–10]from the different energy domains:

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide20
Discussion
  • The problem of the  + – contribution :
    • Experimental situation:
      • new, precise KLOE results in approximate agreement with latest CMD-2 data
      • data without m() and () corr. in strong disagreement with both data sets
      • ALEPH, CLEO and OPAL spectral functions in good agreement within errors
    • Concerning the remaining line shape discrepancy (0.7- 0.9 GeV2):
      • SU(2) corrections: basic contributions identified and stable since long; overall correction applied to  is (– 2.2 ± 0.5)%, dominated by uncontroversial short distance piece; additional long-distance corrections found to be small
      •  lineshape corrections cannot account for the difference above 0.7 GeV2

The fair agreement between KLOE and CMD-2 invalidates the use of data until a better understanding of the discrepancies is achieved

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide21
Preliminary Results

Hadronic contribution from higher order : ahad [(/)3]= – (10.0 ± 0.6) 10–10

Hadronic contribution from LBL scattering: ahad [LBL] = + (12.0 ± 3.5) 10–10

inclu-ding:

Knecht-Nyffeler,Phys.Rev.Lett. 88 (2002) 071802

Melnikov-Vainshtein, hep-ph/0312226

.0

Davier-Marciano, to appear Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sc.

BNL E821 (2004):

aexp = (11 659 208.0  5.8) 1010

not yet published

Observed Difference with Experiment:

not yet published

preliminary

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

slide22
Conclusions and Perspectives
  • Hadronic vacuum polarization is dominant systematics for SM prediction of the muon g–2
  • New data from KLOE in fair agreement with CMD-2 with a (mostly) independent technique
  • Discrepancy with  data (ALEPH & CLEO & OPAL) confirmed
  • Until  /e+e– puzzle is solved, use only e+e– data in dispersion integral
  • We find that the SM prediction differs by 2.7  [e+e–] from experiment (BNL 2004)
  • Future experimental input expected from:
    • New CMD-2 results forthcoming, especially at low and large +–masses
    • BABAR ISR: +– SF over full mass range, multihadron channels (2+2– and +–0 already available)

M. Davier – Hadronic Contribution to (g–2)

ad