1 / 6

Report of the Fellow Evaluation Committee

Report of the Fellow Evaluation Committee. Jane Lehr, Chair March 2012. Newly Elected Fellows. Maenchen McNulty Neuber Smith Tillack Woody. Antonsen Beg Del Guerra Haddad Hassanein Kong. Evaluated by other societies: Scott Tyo (USA) (AP) Thomas Weiland (Germany)(AP)

chesmu
Download Presentation

Report of the Fellow Evaluation Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Report of theFellow Evaluation Committee Jane Lehr, Chair March 2012

  2. Newly Elected Fellows • Maenchen • McNulty • Neuber • Smith • Tillack • Woody • Antonsen • Beg • Del Guerra • Haddad • Hassanein • Kong • Evaluated by other societies: • Scott Tyo (USA) (AP) • Thomas Weiland (Germany)(AP) • ThangachkAsokan (Bangalore) (IA)

  3. Fellow Evaluation Committee for Class of 2013 • Paul Chu, Hong Kong, (TN, PSAC) • Jane Lehr, USA, (PPST) • Jeff Fessler*, USA (NMISC) • Erik Heinje, Switzerland, (TN, RI) • Richard Kouzes*, USA (RI) • Jean Luc Leray, France, (TN, RE) • Ned Sauthoff, USA (FT) • Stan Schriber, USA (PAST) • Jim Schwank, USA, (RE) • Peter Turchi, USA, (PPST) Committee comprised of (1) good people (2) geographic diversity (3) technical diversity * new member

  4. Success Rate • 20 candidates / 12 newly elected IEEE Fellows 60% success rate! NPS has always done well; Last year 45% success • For comparison:DEI (slightly smaller than NPS): 1 MAG (slightly larger than NPS): 2 AP (3 times larger than NPS): 13 • Noticed an interesting trend: A significant number of Fellows are not members of any Society. This is not true for NPS

  5. Why did we do so well? • Essential Ingredients: • Phenomenal Candidates • Great Committee • Revamped the Process: • FEC ranked candidates within their TC preserves the TC ranking of candidates • FEC did a 1st cut candidate summary prior to telecon enhances evaluation of candidates in other TCs • Chair used the candidate summary in final evaluation results in specific and powerful summaries to IEEE Fellow Committee

  6. What is next? • Fellow applications due on 1 March 2012 • Committee is in place • The electronic process is pretty good but there are still issues. For instance, many FEC members cannot access the nominations. It takes forever to download them. • NPSS Website needs a revamped Fellow Page • I will work with Dick Kouzes on new page • Stephen Bayne gave me a list of NPSS Fellows • I should do a “Tips for Successful Nominations” like the one Bill Moses did for Awards

More Related