1 / 1

Introduction

cherie
Download Presentation

Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Establishing baseline values for brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) during microvascular-decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS).Santhosh Kumar Mohanraj, MD1, Parthasarathy D Thirumala, MD1, MS, Miguel Habeych, MD1, Donald Crammond, PhD1 & Jeffrey Balzer, PhD1. 1Centre of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre. Comparison of HLS in patients with significant alerts. Introduction Results • The latencies of wave I,III and V at dura opening were significantly increased when compared to their latency obtained at the beginning of the procedure. But there were no significant decrease in amplitudes were seen. • We analyzed the physiological and pharmacological parameters but they were not significant. • Higher percentages of alerts were communicated to the surgeon when baseline values were set before the beginning of the procedure when compared to baseline values set before major manipulation. • There was one patient with HLS when baseline is set before major manipulation, but on further analysis of this patient’s data we found this as an outlier. HFS is caused by vascular compression of the cranial nerve VII (CN VII) at root exit zone. MVD is a surgical procedure which alleviating HFS by removing the pressure on CN VII1. During MVD, BAEP monitoring is done to decrease the incidence of post operative hearing loss (HLS)2. In BAEP monitoring changes in the waveforms are used to alert the surgeon about impending hearing-loss. These changes are compared to the baseline BAEP values set at the beginning of the procedure. Our study evaluates the appropriate time to establish the baseline values for BAEP during MVD and its implication on the alarm criteria Methods • We retrospectively identified 61 patients who had intraoperative monitoring with BAEP during MVD. • Compared the BAEP values obtained at the beginning of the procedure and before any major manipulation (dura opening). • We analyzed the data by comparing the number of alerts given to the surgeons and the post operative hearing outcomes between baselines set at the beginning of the surgery and before major manipulation. • Latency of wave V (LwV) and amplitude of wave V (AwV) are the only values considered since it is the only wave used in the alarm criteria. Conclusions • Significant variation in BAEP responses exist before any major manipulations during MVD. Baselines can be set before any major manipulations without any loss of sensitivity in value of BAEPs during MVD. • References • Barker FG, 2nd, Jannetta PJ, Bissonette DJ, Shields PT, Larkins MV, Jho HD. Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 1995;82:201-210. • Radtke RA, Erwin CW, Wilkins RH. Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potentials: significant decrease in postoperative morbidity. Neurology 1989;39:187-191.

More Related