1 / 21

Angie French & Blair Terrell Hanover College

Effect of Exposure to Media Images on Perceptual Body Image Distortion and Affective Dissatisfaction. Angie French & Blair Terrell Hanover College. Research Question. What is the perfect woman? (Nichter & Nichter, 1991) - 5’7”, 100 lbs, - long blonde hair - blue eyes.

charlesleblanc
Download Presentation

Angie French & Blair Terrell Hanover College

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effect of Exposure to Media Images on Perceptual Body Image Distortion and Affective Dissatisfaction Angie French & Blair Terrell Hanover College

  2. Research Question What is the perfect woman?(Nichter & Nichter, 1991)- 5’7”, 100 lbs,- long blonde hair - blue eyes • How does exposure to these images influence how women feel about themselves and their bodies? • Perceptual distortion • Social Comparison – (comparison of self to others) Most fashion models meet weight criteria for anorexia nervosa.(Kalodner, 1997) Media is everywhere!

  3. Exposure to Media Images of the Sociocultural Ideal Perceptual Body Image Distortion Increased Affective Body Image Dissatisfaction Social Comparison Hypothesis

  4. Participants • 49 female students from Hanover College • Mean age = 19 • 48 – Caucasian 1 – Pacific Islander

  5. Phase 1 • Two weeks prior to Phase 2 • Social Comparison questionnaire and personal information • Frequency of Social Comparison Scale (Fujita, 1996) • Determines how prone an individual is to compare herself to others • Alpha = .90 • Anonymity protection—code • Street name + last 4 digits from SSN

  6. Phase 2 • PowerPoint slide show of 30 fitness, fashion/beauty, or neutral images from popular magazines Selection criteria: --Only one model per image --3/4 length body shot --no overlaid type --no product shown (criteria from Waller, Hamilton, & Shaw, 1992)

  7. Fitness

  8. Fashion/Beauty

  9. Neutral

  10. Adjustable Light Beam Apparatus (Thompson & Spana, 1988) • Measures perceived size of cheeks, waist, and hips

  11. Actual body size measure • Perceptual distortion = discrepancy between perceived and actual body size of cheeks, waist, and hips (Alpha = .8697) • Eating Disorders Inventory (Garner, Olmstead, & Polivy, 1983) • Drive for Thinness scale • Body Dissatisfaction scale • Alpha = .9351

  12. Results Does media exposure influence perceptual distortion? Exposure to Media Images of the Sociocultural Ideal Perceptual Body Image Distortion Increased Affective Body Image Dissatisfaction Social Comparison

  13. YESPerceptual Distortion • Amount of distortion varied significantly across three conditions, F (1,45) = 3.24, p < .05 • The only post hoc comparison that was significant was between beauty and neutral, p < .05. • Supports previous research  Exposure to beauty images increases distortion

  14. Dissatisfaction means do not vary significantly across media conditions Moderating variable comes into the picture Social Comparison Results Dissatisfaction does not correlate with distortion Exposure to Media Images of the Sociocultural Ideal Perceptual Body Image Distortion Increased Affective Body Image Dissatisfaction

  15. Results cont. • Split Social Comparison into “Low” and “High” categories. • Significant interaction found between social comparison and media condition (F (5, 42) = 2.77, p = .03). • The only significant difference between the means was found in fitness condition (t (15) = 2.4, p = .03).

  16. Discussion • Two media conditions  different effects • Beauty images influence perception (distortion) • Fitness images influence emotion (dissatisfaction)

  17. Fitness  Dissatisfaction • Message behind the fitness images • Idea of achievability • But is it really achievable? • Exposure  GUILT  Dissatisfaction Thin Thighs, Firm Butt, Flat Abs 5 super moves that tone you everywhere! Firm All Your Trouble Zones Get lean and sculpted, melt inches Fastest Ab and Butt Toners Cardio shortcuts Blast fat in 10, 15, 20 mins.

  18. Beauty  Distortion • Beauty images thinner than fitness images • Less guilt because only option of attainability is to take drastic, unhealthy measures (e.g., drug use, eating disorder) Average woman fitness beauty Weight

  19. Limitations • Non-representative sample • 48 Caucasian & 1 Pacific Islander • Homemade equipment • Interrater reliability

  20. Questions

More Related