1 / 12

Lille metropolis area cohesion

Young Planners Working Group Planning and territorial cohesion. Lille metropolis area cohesion. Third phase of Workshop: SWOT analysis. French team june 2012. SWOT analysis. Analysis of each item Governance Mobility Housing ( coming soon : economic !).

charla
Download Presentation

Lille metropolis area cohesion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Young Planners Working Group Planning and territorial cohesion Lille metropolis area cohesion Third phase of Workshop: SWOT analysis Frenchteam june 2012

  2. SWOT analysis • Analysis of each item • Governance • Mobility • Housing • (comingsoon : economic !)

  3. Local Governance: between the administrative division and the metropolitanpolarization Reminder: in France, intercommunal cooperation structures have not local government, they are cooperation structures • The MLA is not an administrative or planning entity • An association providing good practices, a study area to support the metropolitan dynamism • The democratic process tend to justify the classic administrative entities • No policy maker is elected to conduct Lille Metropolis or MLA, the citizens may find the policies a bit technocratic or incomprehensible. • Administration and planning, two warring brothers ? • A legal process in favour metropolitan planning but an administration that will not disappear

  4. Planning as a key factor to enhance local dynamism • SCOT (coherent territorial plan): ties together the various public urban planning policies A kind of large scale masterplan providing objectives in attempt to guarantee territory cohesion through sectorial policies • The local urbanism plan (PLU) at a communal regulatory level Lille Metropolis’ PLU is made at an intercommunal level • Cooperation beyond boundaries • Planning and development agency of Lille Metropolis and Coalfield Mission conducting studies for AML • Commercial chambers concerting economic world • Stakeholders meeting in Grand Lille Committee • Toward planning supported by AML ?

  5. Toward a metropolitan governance

  6. Mobility and main infrastructures • RAILWAY NETWORK • LMA is particularly well placed on the north-european high-speed train netwok • Eurallile district as a symbol of Lille as triangle center of Brussels/London/Paris • High-speed train-plane relationship via Paris or Brussels Airport improve area accessibility • Lille Airport isn’t efficient due to accessibility to this two airports and railway network • Regional railway network is quite efficient but a lake of links between LMA french and belgium regions • RET-GV : using high-speed trains to intern transportation is a cohesion factor…and also is too expensive

  7. Mobility and main infrastructures • FREIGHT AND WATERWAY • LMA is a hub for freight : • Easy acces to northern range of sea ports • (like Antwerp, Rotterdam,..) • Array of waterway, road and rail services • Delta 3 Dourges hub • North seine europe canal in 2017 • ROADS • Interface of motorways • Traffic congestion around Lille due to : • Many people and goods • Urban developments where car is needed each day • PUBLIC URBAN TRANSPORTATION • Need to develop offer(bus and tram-train routes) • Try to facilitate mobility : • New hubs • Combined prices

  8. Mobility and main infrastructures

  9. Housing • Inside a territory of cohesion, the residentialmobility must be possible sothat a feeling of commonidentityexists and sothat do not developsectorshollow of a territorial cohesion on a widerterritory. • Weshall observe the sectorswhere the housing stock presentsspecificities susceptible to reveal a defect of territorial cohesion. • WORKING ORIENTATIONS • The constitution of the housing stock: • smallhousing in city center and bighousing in periphery. This factdetermines on the French part more than on the Belgian part the choices of residentiallocalization of the residents, according to theirage. • On this point, an interview with a propertydevelopercould let us understand the logics of construction whichtakes to thisspecialization. • The state of the housing stock: • wecan observe a deterioration of housing on someoldworkerresidential areas. In the centers-city of the UrbanCommunity of Lille, bighousingexist, but because of their state they are unhabited. • An interview with an association whichworks in urbanregenerationthenwith the UrbanCommunity of Lille couldallow us to know the means and the actorsimplied in the answer to thisphenomenon.

  10. Housing • WORKING ORIENTATIONS • The price of housing: • according to places, the prices of housings are verydiversified. • An interview with a social sociallessorcouldallow us to understand the possibilities of rebalancing of the offer of housing. • The localization of housing and the access to the services and to the jobs: • big infrastructures of transport keepsomeresidential areas at a distance. Thesesame infrastructures connectresidential areas in pole of jobs. • An analysis of the territorywill have to allow us to understandthis point. • The disparities of territoriesseemless important on the Belgian part. Theyseemparticularly important inside of the territory of the UrbanCommunity of Lille. It isalso the mosturbanterritory of the metropolitan Area of Lille.

  11. Housing

  12. Thanks !

More Related