Canada wide science fair expo sciences pancanadienne
Download
1 / 47

- PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 170 Views
  • Updated On :

Canada Wide Science Fair Expo-sciences pancanadienne. 2003 CALGARY. CWSF 2000 London. Picture of a Project. Insert a few pictures of projects here. CWSF 2000. CWSF 2000. CWSF 2000. CWSF 2000. Qualifications for a Judge. Previous Judging Experience Regional Fair School Fair

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '' - channary


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Canada wide science fair expo sciences pancanadienne l.jpg

Canada Wide Science FairExpo-sciences pancanadienne

2003CALGARY


Slide2 l.jpg

CWSF 2000 London

CWSF Judging Workshop


Picture of a project l.jpg
Picture of a Project

  • Insert a few pictures of projects here.

CWSF Judging Workshop

CWSF 2000





Qualifications for a judge l.jpg
Qualifications for a Judge

  • Previous Judging Experience

    • Regional Fair

    • School Fair

  • Post Secondary Education

    • Science

    • Engineering

  • Experience in evaluating exhibitor work

    • Teacher, Teaching Assistant, Professor.

    • Senior Undergraduates

  • Bilingual Judges are particularly welcome.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Before the fair l.jpg
Before The Fair

  • Attend the Judges Training Program.

  • Read the 5 Page Reports

  • Be sure you know if you are judging:

    • Divisional Awards (Day One)

      • Gold, Silver, Bronze, Honorable Mentions

    • Special Awards (Day Two)

    • Or Both

CWSF Judging Workshop


Divisional judging l.jpg
Divisional Judging

Tuesday 13 May 2003

CWSF 2002

CWSF Judging Workshop


Divisional judging six divisions l.jpg
Divisional JudgingSix Divisions

  • Biotechnology

  • Computing and Mathematical Sciences

  • Earth & Environmental Sciences

  • Engineering

  • Life Sciences

  • Physical Sciences

CWSF Judging Workshop


Categories in each division there are three categories l.jpg
CategoriesIn each Divisionthere are three Categories

CWSF Judging Workshop


Division heads l.jpg
Division Heads

CWSF Judging Workshop


Category chairs l.jpg
Category Chairs

CWSF Judging Workshop


Awards l.jpg
Awards

In each of 18 Divisions and Categories

  • 1 Gold

  • 2 Silver

  • 3 Bronze

  • Up 10 Honourable Mention

CWSF Judging Workshop


Divisional judging15 l.jpg
Divisional Judging

  • The Divisional Judging should be a highlight of the Fair for exhibitors.

  • Finalists will be judged five times.

  • Interviews will last 20-25 minutes.

  • Judges will bring:

    • empathy, experience, erudition, expertise.

  • Final decision is made by consensus.

  • Revisit project(s), if necessary- no finalists present.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Divisional judging teams example l.jpg
Divisional Judging TeamsExample

CWSF Judging Workshop


A single judging team l.jpg
A Single Judging Team

  • Has five members

  • Has a 2 co-captains who stay for round two of judging.

  • Judges each exhibit for 20-25 minutes.

  • Judges eight exhibits typically.

  • Each judge individually uses judging form to rank exhibits.

  • Judges from 9:00 am – 3:30 pm.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Timetable l.jpg
Timetable

CWSF Judging Workshop


Timetable contd l.jpg
Timetable (contd.)

CWSF Judging Workshop


Roles of a judge l.jpg
Roles of a Judge

  • Facilitator

  • Motivator

  • Role Model

  • Counselor

  • Evaluator

CWSF Judging Workshop


Facilitator l.jpg
Facilitator

  • Introduce yourself.

    • Where you come from, what you do.

  • Ask the exhibitor to introduce herself.

  • Listen respectfully to the presentation.

  • Ask graded questions

    • stop when the limit of knowledge is reached.

  • Find two things to praise.

  • Give a minimum 20 minute interview.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Motivator l.jpg
Motivator

  • Focus on the exhibitors.

  • Ask questions in an upbeat tone.

  • Listen intently.

  • Give lots of encouragement.

    • I liked …

    • I enjoyed …

  • Thank them for sharing their project with you.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Role model l.jpg
Role Model

  • You are

    • Judge

    • Scientist

    • Educational Leader

    • Business Leader

  • You represent all of these aspects.

  • Let the exhibitors say

    “That was a fantastic judging experience”

CWSF Judging Workshop


Counselor l.jpg
Counselor

  • Use the Feedback to Exhibitors form.

  • Find two things to praise.

  • Make one suggestion for further improvement.

    • I suggest …

    • A technique I have used…

  • Do not coach during the judging process.

    • otherwise exhibitors function at the B- level for the first judge, and the A+ level for the fifth.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Evaluation components l.jpg
Evaluation Components

CWSF Judging Workshop


Judges must not l.jpg
Judges must not…

  • Convey by body language or otherwise a sense of dismay.

  • Judge an exhibit seen elsewhere.

  • Discuss their opinions in public areas.

  • Treat this as a Ph.D. examination.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Judging without the exhibitors monday 12 may after judges briefing l.jpg
Judging Without the ExhibitorsMonday 12 May after Judges Briefing

  • Read the Backboard

    • Assess the impact and Level of the Project

    • Can you understand the story?

  • Read the Workbook

  • Does the equipment displayed add to the exhibit?

  • Note your questions and compliments.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Judging with the exhibitors l.jpg
Judging with the Exhibitors

  • Use the Judging Form

    • Scientific Thought 45%

    • Original Creativity 25%

    • Display 20%

    • 5 Page Summary 10%

  • Use the form to help you determine if project A ranks higher or lower than project B.

  • After this phase, only rankings are used.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Sample questions general l.jpg
Sample Questions - General

  • Why did you decide to study this topic?

  • What are your controlled variables?

  • How accurate are your readings?

  • What future applications can you see from the results of this project?

  • What one outstanding thing did you learn doing this project?

  • How would you improve this project if you would do it again?

  • Who, if any, helped you with this project?

CWSF Judging Workshop


Sample questions specific l.jpg
Sample Questions - Specific

  • What is the wavelength of your laser?

  • What is an “elastic” collision?

  • What is the chemical formula for glycerin?

  • What is chlorophyll?

  • What is diffraction?

  • Why is the Greenhouse Effect so called?

CWSF Judging Workshop


At the team meeting l.jpg
At the Team Meeting

  • Add individual rankings - low score wins.

  • Discus rankings until you reach consensus.

  • Three choices:

    • Exhibit goes on to the next phase for an award

    • Exhibit gets Honourable Mention

    • Exhibit is not considered for a division award

  • Co-captains stay for the selection of awards recipients

CWSF Judging Workshop


Exhibitor feedback sheets l.jpg
Exhibitor Feedback Sheets

  • Very important part of the CWSF

  • One judge collects all five judging forms.

  • Find two things to praise.

  • Point out areas that need improvement.

  • Suggest possible further work.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Selection of awards recipients l.jpg
Selection of Awards Recipients

  • Involves all Co-captains.

  • Takes place after supper.

  • Visit all exhibits selected for this round.

  • One judge who has seen an exhibit before presents it to the group.

  • Decision is by consensus.

  • Award one gold medal unless minimum criteria for a gold medal are not met by any project

  • Be generous with Honourable Mentions

CWSF Judging Workshop


Reporting the results l.jpg
Reporting the Results

  • Fill in the Report in full. Give:

    • Exhibit Number

    • Name of Exhibitor

    • Title

  • Check it again!

  • Team Captains sign it.

  • Give it to the Division Head.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Faq 1 l.jpg
FAQ 1

  • We don’t think a gold medal should be awarded

    Response

  • Awarding a gold medal is highly desirable.

  • This is a relative competition. The Olympic speed skater who did not fall won the gold in one race.

  • BEFORE recommending that no gold medal be awarded, you MUST consult:

    • the Division Head,

    • Host Committee Chief Judge Om Malik

    • National Judge-in-Chief Pat Whippey

    • They will discuss the minimum criteria for a Gold.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Faq 2 l.jpg
FAQ 2

Can we award two gold Medals?

Response

  • Possibly, in extremely rare cases.

  • The total number of gold medals within your Division is three (1 Jr., 1 Int., 1 Sr.)

  • Each Gold includes a cash award of $1500.

  • Each Division is sponsored at a total $ value.

  • Consult the National Judge-in-Chief Pat Whippey

CWSF Judging Workshop


Faq 3 l.jpg
FAQ 3

We have five contenders for a Bronze.

Response

  • If you are having trouble reaching a decision, consult:

    • Division Head

    • Host Committee Chief Judge Om Malik

    • National Judge-in-Chief Pat Whippey

CWSF Judging Workshop


Your reward l.jpg
Your Reward

  • Meet some outstanding exhibitors.

  • Meet some new colleagues

  • Learn something at each exhibit.

  • Give back to the community.

  • Contribute to the largest volunteer scientific program for youth in Canada.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Special awards wednesday 14 may 2003 l.jpg
Special AwardsWednesday 14 May 2003

  • 100 Special Awards.

  • Each exhibitor self-nominates for a maximum of seven.

  • Between 5 and 100 self-nominations per award.

  • One information card for each self-nominated project.

  • Eliminate 75% of finalists in first round.

  • Special Awards Co-Ordinator: Esha Chaudhuri

CWSF Judging Workshop


Judging day 2 goals l.jpg
Judging Day 2 Goals

  • The Special Award Judging should be a highlight of the Fair for exhibitors.

  • Interviews last 10-12 minutes.

  • Finalists will be judged at least once for each qualified self-nomination.

  • Judges will bring:

    • empathy, experience, erudition, expertise.

  • Successive rounds may be needed.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Special awards timetable l.jpg
Special Awards Timetable

CWSF Judging Workshop


Special award judging team l.jpg
Special Award Judging Team

  • Coordinator and team members discuss and agree on procedures.

  • Judge each exhibit for 10-12 minutes max.

  • Team meets over lunch to draw up a short list.

  • Revisit the projects on short list after lunch, if necessary.

  • If you are finished early, please be available to judge another award.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Report your results l.jpg
Report your Results

  • Fill in your top five choices – some exhibitors may not be able to accept a specific award.

  • Give in full:

    • Exhibit Number

    • Names of exhibitors

    • Exhibit Title.

  • The redundancy helps us track errors.

  • The Team Captain signs the report.

  • Give it to the Host Chief Judge Om Malik.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Faq 4 l.jpg
FAQ - 4

  • Can I give an award to someone who has not self-nominated?

    Response

    No. This is unfair to other exhibitors who might have wanted to self-nominate for the award and to those who did. The exhibitor may have reached his/her limit of 7 self-nominations and/or may not have wanted the award.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Faq 5 l.jpg
FAQ - 5

  • Can I give a Senior Special Award to an outstanding Intermediate Student?

  • Response

  • No. Each award’s sponsor provides particular criteria so the award is only open for self-nomination to eligible projects. Overriding the criteria negates the self-nomination process and makes the equitable judging of Special Awards impossible.

CWSF Judging Workshop


Slide46 l.jpg

And The Winner Is…

CWSF Judging Workshop


Acknowledgments l.jpg
Acknowledgments

  • Past Chief Judges.

  • Patrick Whippey, National Judge-in-Chief

  • Bay Area Science and Engineering Fair

    • http://www.basef.mcmaster.ca

CWSF Judging Workshop


ad