chandler
Uploaded by
15 SLIDES
1200 VIEWS
230LIKES

Comparison of Microwave and Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Tissue in a Porcine in vivo Model.

DESCRIPTION

Comparison of Microwave and Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Tissue in a Porcine in vivo Model. Andrew Wright MD, Chris Johnson, Fred Lee Jr. MD, and David Mahvi MD. Departments of Radiology and Surgery University of Wisconsin Hospital. Microwave Ablation.

1 / 15

Download Presentation

Comparison of Microwave and Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Tissue in a Porcine in vivo Model.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison of Microwave and Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Tissue in a Porcine in vivo Model. Andrew Wright MD, Chris Johnson, Fred Lee Jr. MD, and David Mahvi MD Departments of Radiology and Surgery University of Wisconsin Hospital

  2. Microwave Ablation • Theoretical advantages over radiofrequency ablation • No ground pad • Not limited by tissue charring and impedence changes • Larger zone of active heating • Use of Multiple Probes

  3. Hypothesis • Because microwave and radiofrequency ablation are both heat based, there will be no difference in ablation size or lesion pathology between the two technologies

  4. Methods • Microwave Ablation • Vivant Medical prototype system • 10 minute ablation, 40 Watts • Radiofrequency Ablation • RITA Medical Systems Starburst • 10 minute ablation, 3cm deployment 100oC target temperature

  5. Microwave Ablation System • Vivant Medical • 13g, 15cm dipole antenna • 915MHz generator • Fiberoptic temperature monitor

  6. Radiofrequency Ablation System • RITA Medical • 14g, 15cm expandable array • 460 kHz generator • Integrated thermocouple

  7. Treatment Protocol • Nineteen crossbred female swine • 0, 2, and 28 day survival groups • Mix of MW and RF lesions in each animal • Pathology, serial CT scanning • 28 Day survival group • 4 MW or 4 RF lesions in each animal • Pathology, serial lab draws

  8. Lesion Volume * * * p=.02

  9. Lesion Length * ▪ ▪ ◦ * ◦ * p<.001 ▪ p=.02 ◦ p<.001

  10. Lesion Diameter

  11. Laboratory Data • No significant difference in AST, ALT, LDH, Alkaline Phosphatase, WBC, or HCT * * p<0.001

  12. 48o Pathology RFA MW Immediate 4 weeks

  13. CT Imaging 48 Hours 4 Weeks

  14. Summary • MW lesions longer than RF • Pathological and radiologic characteristics similar between RF and MW ablation • Both MW and RF cause thrombocytopenia at 48 hours • MW ablation technically easier than multiple-prong RF ablation

  15. Conclusions • MW creates similar zones of coagulation necrosis as RF • MW ablation has several theoretical advantages over RF • Larger zone of active heating • Ability to use multiple probes

More Related