the writing process n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
The Writing Process PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
The Writing Process

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 9

The Writing Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 114 Views
  • Uploaded on

The Writing Process . Paraphrasing . Paraphrasing / Steps to take. " Paraphrase passages that present important points, explanations, or arguments but that don't contain memorable or straightforward wording.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The Writing Process' - chad


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
paraphrasing steps to take
Paraphrasing / Steps to take
  • "Paraphrase passages that present important points, explanations, or arguments but that don't contain memorable or straightforward wording.
  • Quickly review the passage to get a sense of the whole, and then go through the passage carefully, sentence by sentence.
  • State the ideas in your own words, defining words as needed.
  • If necessary, edit for clarity, but don't change the meaning.
  • If you borrow phrases directly, put them in quotation marks.
  • Check your paraphrase against the original for accurate tone and meaning.”

(R. VanderMey, The College Writer. Houghton, 2007)

paraphrasing an example
Paraphrasing: An Example
  • The linguistic criticism of Nineteen Eighty-Four has focused primarily on Newspeak as a language and on Orwell's ideas about the relationship between language and thought. It has largely ignored, however, the literary language Orwell used in writing Nineteen Eighty-Four. Indeed, the few critical remarks about Orwell's use of language have generally been negative — sometimes attributing the dull, monotonous, dry writing style to Orwell's career as a journalist or to the phlegmatic topic of his novel. Irving Howe, for example, writes thatthe style of 1984, which many readers take to be drab or uninspired or sweaty, would have been appreciated by someone like Defoe, since Defoe would have immediately understood how the pressures of Orwell's subject, like the pressures of his own, demand a gritty and hammering factuality. The style of 1984 is the style of a man whose commitment to a dreadful vision is at war with the nausea to which that vision reduces him. So acute is this conflict that delicacies of phrasing or displays of rhetoric come to seem frivolous — he has no time, he must get it all down. Those who fail to see this, I am convinced, have succumbed to the pleasant tyrannies of estheticism; they have allowed their fondness for a cultivated style to blind them to the urgencies of prophetic expression. The last thing Orwell cared about when he wrote 1984, the last thing he should have cared about, was literature.
word for word plagiarism
Word-for-word Plagiarism
  • The linguistic criticism of Nineteen Eighty-Fourfocuses mostly on Newspeak as a language and on Orwell's ideas about language and thought. The few critical remarks about Orwell's use of language have been bad, claiming that his poor writing style was due to Orwell's career as a journalist or the topic of his novel. Only the critic Irving Howe felt that Orwell's style appreciated by someone like Defoe. Kies believes all those critics are wrong.
why word for word is wrong
Why word-for-word is wrong
  • The red words are directly copied from the source. Notice that the writer has not only "borrowed" the original's ideas with no acknowledgment, he or she has maintained the author's method of expression and sentence structure. Even if the writer had acknowledged the source of these ideas, this passage would still be plagiarized because much of its exact wording comes from the original with no quotation marks to indicate that the language is the original's.
cut and paste paraphrasing
Cut and Paste Paraphrasing
  • Most critics who discuss the language of 1984 either focus primarily on Newspeak as a language or Orwell's ideas about the relationship between language and thought. The few who describe the novel's writing style have a negative reaction. They argue that its dreary style is a product of Orwell's career as a journalist or the phlegmatic topic of his novel. Even one critic's defense of Orwell's style seems wrong.
why cut paste paraphrasing is wrong
Why cut & paste paraphrasing is wrong
  • In the second example, the "cut-and-paste" plagiarism example, note the red phrases which have been borrowed from the original and shifted around. The original's structure has been modified to a certain extent by the writer, but numerous key phrases have been retained without quotation marks, and the source has not been credited.
paraphrase the following passage
Paraphrase the following passage:
  • "The Antarctic is the vast source of cold on our planet, just as the sun is the source of our heat, and it exerts tremendous control on our climate," [Jacques] Cousteau told the camera. "The cold ocean water around Antarctica flows north to mix with warmer water from the tropics, and its upwellings help to cool both the surface water and our atmosphere. Yet the fragility of this regulating system is now threatened by human activity." From "Captain Cousteau," Audubon (May 1990):17.
paraphrase the following passage1
Paraphrase the following passage
  • 5. "While the Sears Tower is arguably the greatest achievement in skyscraper engineering so far, it's unlikely that architects and engineers have abandoned the quest for the world's tallest building. The question is: Just how high can a building go? Structural engineer William LeMessurier has designed a skyscraper nearly one-half mile high, twice as tall as the Sears Tower. And architect Robert Sobel claims that existing technology could produce a 500-story building." From Ron Bachman, "Reaching for the Sky." Dial (May 1990): 15.