1 / 12

Local Government and Devolution in Britain

Local Government and Devolution in Britain. Mike Emmerich Director Institute for Political and Economic Governance University of Manchester. Scope of Presentation. Background – central local relations Post 1997 reforms to Local Government An Interim Assessment. Conclusions.

cera
Download Presentation

Local Government and Devolution in Britain

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Local Government and Devolution in Britain Mike Emmerich Director Institute for Political and Economic Governance University of Manchester

  2. Scope of Presentation • Background – central local relations • Post 1997 reforms to Local Government • An Interim Assessment

  3. Conclusions • Devolution is underway in Scotland and Wales • Some change in England but devolution will be largely administrative • The extent of centralisation has consequences: • Inhibits local innovation • Constrains scope for elected Local Government to play the role of “Community Leader” • Limits local prioritisation and maintains uniform service levels for key services • Devolution and Political Contestability

  4. Background – Central Local Relations • Unitary state – few checks and balances • Crisis of local government legitimacy: • Falling turnouts and low quality leadership • Decline in the role and powers of local government • Water supply and treatment • Higher education (polytechnics) • Further education • Reduced local fiscal autonomy • Large-scale reorganisation

  5. Background – Central Local Relations Why centralise? • Constitutionally possible response to crisis • Ideology in the 1980s • To preserve universal public services Has centralisation worked? • Probably not as practised, leading to: • New localism post-2001? • More sophisticated central intervention

  6. Post-1997 Reforms to Local Government • The 1997 Labour Manifesto • Aim: improve local government legitimacy • Reform to promote “Community Leadership”: • Split executive and scrutiny • New forms of executive - mayors • Reform to improve services: • Councils required to review all services to ensure they offer “Best Value” • Independent (audit-like) inspection • A long-term programme

  7. Further Post-1997 Reforms • Developing partnerships • Contracts between Government and Councils (Local Public Service Agreements) • A joint Government/Local Authority Forum (the Central Local Partnership) • Partnerships between key local agencies (Local Strategic Partnerships) • Experiments with citizen engagement • Impatience at the Centre • new services not run by local government • Increasing use of specific “ring-fenced” grants

  8. Changing Context Since 2001 • General Election – a referendum on public services? • Limits to traditional forms of service delivery • Development of new forms of devolved service management • The Prime Minister’s Principles of Public Service Reform: • National standards • Delegation and devolution to the front line • flexibility - challenging restrictive practices and reducing red tape • expanding choice and contestability

  9. Local Government Reform Post-2001 • Earned autonomy • More freedoms for all but….. • Better Councils “earn” the right to freedoms • Devolve more quickly to some than others • Greater emphasis on intervention where Councils fail • More flexible organisation: • Powers for Councils to trade – including to run the services of others • Partnerships between groups of Councils and the Private Sector • Greater fiscal autonomy back on the agenda

  10. An Interim Assessment • Public service reform has been a higher priority than devolution to Local Government • Devolution more evident in Scotland and Wales • Growing realisation that effective services can’t be run from the centre • Framework for administrative devolution now in place in England

  11. Conclusions • Devolution is underway in Scotland and Wales • Some change in England but devolution will be largely administrative • There exist limits to devolved governance in a unitary state which: • Inhibit local innovation • Constrain scope for elected Local Government to play the role of “Community Leader” • Limit local prioritisation and maintain uniform service levels for key services

  12. www.ipeg.org.uk

More Related