1 / 25

The global body for professional accountants

The global body for professional accountants. Presentation to Parliament: Companies Amendment Bill 2010. Presented by: Nicolaas van Wyk Technical Executive, ACCA (South Africa) www.acca.co.za. Introduction. Appreciation to the DTI for their engagement with business community since 2004

celine
Download Presentation

The global body for professional accountants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The global body for professional accountants

  2. Presentation to Parliament: Companies Amendment Bill 2010 Presented by: Nicolaas van Wyk Technical Executive, ACCA (South Africa) www.acca.co.za

  3. Introduction • Appreciation to the DTI for their engagement with business community since 2004 • Commitment to clear and concise legislation • Our submission in two parts • General comment • Comment on specific sections

  4. Summary - 1 • An act for big and small companies • This means minimum requirements for all companies and • Selective application for others based on public interest and company activities • Financial crises = Banks • Audit = public interest • Guard against overburdening the SME sector

  5. Summary - 2 • Move away from audit as sole means of protecting public • Act provides much more sophisticated approach to public protection • New emphasis on preparers of financial statements • Improving accounting officer regime by introducing independent review

  6. Summary - 3 • Use Accounting Officer regime to model regulation for Independent Review • Use IFAC education standards and quality control standards to determine the qualification of independent review providers.

  7. General comments • Fundamentals of Companies Act 2008 • Entrepreneurship • Enterprise development • Simplification • Reducing costs • Flexibility in design • Transparency and standards of governance • International harmonious

  8. General comments • Drafting framework • Align with Constitution and Bill of rights • Unitary statute incorporating Companies Act and Close Corporations Act • Single legislation for all types of companies • Accountability to minority shareholders and stakeholders • Emulate international best practice • Amendments should adhere to these principles

  9. General comments • Examples: • Section 7: require compliance with Bill of Rights • Section 11: allowing registration number as name of company • Section 30: simplify management of companies via audit exemption and new alternative to audit • Section 30 and regulations: align independent review with international best practice

  10. General comments • Examples: • Section 72: social and ethics committee for types of companies • Section 164: Dissenting shareholder appraisal rights • Section 165: Derivative actions for shareholders and registered trade unions

  11. General comments • Differential governance: • Public companies, Listed companies, Non-owner managed private companies, Owner-managed private companies • The late Deputy Minister of Agriculture and corporate law expert, Dirk du Toit: “Thus the legal system looks beyond the class interest of the business elite, doing justice to all classes, applying the moral imperative”

  12. Differential reporting Close Corporations Act • Owner = Manager • No agency • US/Canadian • Gaap as appropriate • Accounting officer Companies Act 1973 • Public owners • Agency • UK perspective • IFRS or IFRS for SME • Auditor Companies Act 2008 Draft companies regulations 2010

  13. Differential reporting IFRS Audit Independent review ISRE2400 / FEE survey Accounting officers Qualification IFRS for SME ED275/OCBA MOI/Bank

  14. Tax collection - Estimate IFRS Audit Public interest and Public Companies 85% IFRS for SME Independent review Non-public interest and non-owner managed 10% Non-public interest non-owner managed 5% MOI/Bank ED275/OCBA

  15. General comments • Enhanced enforcement powers • Reckless trading prohibited by (Section 22 and draft Regulation 21) • Administrative penalties for not keeping and safeguarding accounting records (S. 28 and R. 24) • Administrative penalties if financial statements are not prepared in accordance with a prescribed standard (S. 29-30, R. 28-29) • Administrative penalties if a person is party to the preparation of misleading financial statements (S. 214) • Retention of the audit for public companies, state owned companies and private companies classified as public interest. (S. 30(2)(b)(i) and draft R. 28 - 29) • Additional accountability requirements for certain companies (S. 34)

  16. General comments • Enhanced enforcement powers • Codifying standards of directors conduct and providing for director and prescribed officer liability (S. 76 and S. 77), • Establishing a new Companies Commission with extensive enforcement powers • Appoint investigators • Actively monitor compliance • Compliance notices • Issue summons • Search and seizure • Companies Tribunal • “Enlightened shareholder value” approach with regard to the governance of companies • Judge Davis, D et al, Companies and other Business Structures in South Africa, 2009

  17. Specific comments

  18. Specific comments

  19. Specific comments

  20. Specific comments

  21. Specific comments

  22. Specific comments

  23. Specific replies • SARS – Verification is inherent in the Act via Sections 28 – 29 • Extensive requirements on form and content of accounting records and how they should be kept • SARS – Reportable irregularities additional burden to SMEs • Tax collection from SME’s are limited • IR do not provide a check on internal controls, this limits potential to become aware of fraud • Act provides abundant alternative monitoring in the new Companies Commission • IRBA • IRBA regulates auditors who act in public interest, IR not designed to protect public interest indeed IR not applicable to public interest companies • IR standard = International standard = ISRE 2400 = Subject to IFAC quality control and qualification requirements = FEE survey • Monitoring has many forms – Regulator or Professional Body – International precedent

  24. Specific replies • IRBA • Qualification for IR provider is important – IFAC Education and other standards should apply to all IR providers

More Related