1 / 12

Dr. Henrik Syse Former Head of Corporate Governance, NBIM ( Norges Bank Investment Management)

How to balance ethics, culture, and money Reflections on Sovereign Wealth, Norwegian Oil – and Money in General. Dr. Henrik Syse Former Head of Corporate Governance, NBIM ( Norges Bank Investment Management) Senior Research Fellow, PRIO (Int’l Peace Research Institute, Oslo)

cayla
Download Presentation

Dr. Henrik Syse Former Head of Corporate Governance, NBIM ( Norges Bank Investment Management)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How to balance ethics, culture, and money Reflections on Sovereign Wealth, Norwegian Oil – and Money in General Dr. Henrik Syse Former Head of Corporate Governance, NBIM (Norges Bank Investment Management) Senior Research Fellow, PRIO (Int’l Peace Research Institute, Oslo) e-mail: henrik@prio.no Heinrich Steffens Vorlesung Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin January 27, 2009 footer tekst

  2. Temptations • Primary and secondary goals may become confused • Short-term vs. long-term time horizons • Important to remember the possibility – and desirability – of plural motivations What’s really the problem with ethics and money? footer tekst

  3. NBIM managesthe ”NorwegianGovernment Pension Fund – Global” (the ”Petroleum Fund”; stateincome from petroleum activity); assets under management: close to EUR 230 bn.; largestsovereignwealth fund in Europe and North America. • The fund has ethical guidelines, whichincludebothexclusions and activeownership. (Washing one’s conscience clean?) • Financial aim of investments; yet ethics plays a definite role. Midway between “SRI” and “hardcore finance”. Background to theNorwegian fund footer tekst

  4. NBIM has its own guidelines on corporate governance, based on OECD and UN Global Compact guidelines, and on the guidelines of the Norwegian Government. • From 2005: Corporate Governance defined as a separate task with its own task group within the bank, with combined competence in governance, ethics, and finance. • Part of a worldwide trend, strengthened by the current financial crisis. At its heart a governance problem? NBIM and Corporate Governance footer tekst

  5. As long-term, institutional investors one is negotiating between at least two (often more) ethical concerns. So it is not necessarily “ethics vs. business”, but equally often “ethics vs. ethics”, since the long-term financial profitability of the fund is an ethical concern in itself. • Norway as a political actor, or a financial actor? • A need for the investment manager to maintain investor credibility – and not be a political actor. Ethics, business, and investment footer tekst

  6. After the financial scandals of the late 90s and early 00s, such as Enron and WorldCom, large investors started taking their ownership rights and duties more seriously, also by becoming sensitive to ethics- and governance related issues within companies. • Furthermore, large investors were and are increasingly expected – by their fiduciaries and society at large – to be sensitive to social and environmental effects of their portfolio companies’ activities. Ethics, business, and investment (cont’d) footer tekst

  7. At least five reasons why seemingly “extra-financial” factors are important: • The long-term solidity and sustainability of the markets themselves. (“Universal ownership”) • The principal – agent problem • The profile of our fund(s) – what our owners expect of the fund, and the fund’s reputation vis-à-vis its owners • The reputational and subsequent financial damage to the companies one is invested in • ... And the fact that it is right in itself! Ethics, business, and investment (cont’d) footer tekst

  8. Voting • Company engagement • Engagement with standard setters • Networking with other investors • Legal means • Public communication • Academic research • Aim: concrete change (in companies and markets), and contribution to the ongoing debate Practicaltools – whatdoesone do? footer tekst

  9. Good corporate governance (e.g., voting rights, board responsibility, and greater transparency) • Child labor and children’s rights • Lobbying and the environment Focus areas at NBIM footer tekst

  10. Fiduciary responsibility to one’s owners • Complicity through ownership • Role responsibility as a large actor • All of these are relevant to the large institutional investor Whatkindofresponsibilities? footer tekst

  11. To insist much more thoroughly on ethical standards in financial services in particular, and in business in general. • To achieve better government regulation. • To ensure breadth in leadership personalities and qualities. • To widen knowledge and concern about financial markets. Ourmainchallenges footer tekst

  12. ”Neither a borrower nor a lender be” – impossible in today’s globalized market. • But can we nonetheless insist on certain virtues? • Plato’s cardinal virtues may be a good place to start. • Although we may have to rely on a dose of the theological virtues as well... UndNorwegen– wasnun, kleiner Mann...? footer tekst

More Related