1 / 4

IETF CCAMP

IETF CCAMP. Addressing and Messaging in Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Networks: Best Practices draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-addressing-00.txt Richard Rabbat Rajiv Papneja Kohei Shiomoto. Lyndon Ong (Ciena) Vijay Pandian (Sycamore) Hari Rakotoranto(Cisco).

cassandra-lott
Download Presentation

IETF CCAMP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IETF CCAMP Addressing and Messaging in Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Networks: Best Practices draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-addressing-00.txt Richard Rabbat Rajiv Papneja Kohei Shiomoto Lyndon Ong (Ciena) Vijay Pandian (Sycamore) Hari Rakotoranto(Cisco) Contributors: Yumiko Kawashima(NTT) Ashok Narayanan (Cisco) Eiji Oki (NTT) draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-addressing-00.txt

  2. Motivation for this Draft • Proposes best common practices for GMPLS-based networks • Builds on experience gained from the testing in GMPLS-based networks, this draft proposes solutions to some interoperability issues we found • Those issues were due to the fact that text in some RFCs is not sufficiently clear draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-addressing-00.txt

  3. Summary • Main topics • Addressing schemes for numbered and unnumbered links • RSVP-TE Message Content • Recommendations for setting values for the following • Router ID (OSPF Router ID or ISIS System ID) and TE router ID • IPv4 addresses in RSVP Objects • Incoming vs. Outgoing Interface ID in ERO and RRO draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-addressing-00.txt

  4. In Conclusion • Current state • Draft is being discussed on and off the CCAMP ML • Many comments received • Interest in this topic is growing due to the various interoperability events that have occurred • This draft is an attempt to collect items of study and makes an initial attempt at resolving them • What’s next • Topic in new charter • Looking for more contributions (Send email to list and editors) • Target is to eventually get it accepted as WG draft draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-addressing-00.txt

More Related