1 / 7

Carole Dische Geoff Dische London College of Communication

SELEAC 2003-4715 /001-001 EDU-ELEARN. Essential quality criteria for re-useable e-learning content and quality management in a virtual community. Carole Dische Geoff Dische London College of Communication. Objective. SELEAC 2003-4715 /001-001 EDU-ELEARN.

carter-burris
Download Presentation

Carole Dische Geoff Dische London College of Communication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SELEAC 2003-4715 /001-001 EDU-ELEARN Essential quality criteria for re-useable e-learning content and quality management in a virtual community Carole Dische Geoff Dische London College of Communication

  2. Objective SELEAC 2003-4715 /001-001 EDU-ELEARN • To show you the quality processes used in the Seleac portal • To engage you in a discussion about your quality issues in developing and delivering e-learning.

  3. Quality in Seleac SELEAC 2003-4715 /001-001 EDU-ELEARN • Documents • Review process • Validation process

  4. Review process SELEAC 2003-4715 /001-001 EDU-ELEARN • Chief editors • For each subject area • Appoint validators • For each SCO

  5. Validation process SELEAC 2003-4715 /001-001 EDU-ELEARN Author writes SCO SCO loaded into Seleac Review Validation makes SCO active

  6. Discussion SELEAC 2003-4715 /001-001 EDU-ELEARN • Groups • Discuss your quality issues • Quality standards and processes • National • Institutional • What you would want from a community like Seleac? • Would you expect Seleac standards to be more important than institutional or national standards?

  7. Results of discussions SELEAC 2003-4715 /001-001 EDU-ELEARN

More Related