E N D
1. Successful Scientific Writing
2. in close proximity to - near
the predominant number of
in a large number of cases
on a previous occasion
in the absence of
with regard to
at some future time
due to the fact that
serves the function of being
3. I am a bear of
very little brain…
and long words bother me.
4. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases
From Thurlbeck, WM. Glasnost and communication.
Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;139:282-283.
5. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
6. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
I didn't look up the original references.
7. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
I didn't look up the original references.
"It is believed that..."
8. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
I didn't look up the original references.
"It is believed that..."
I think.
9. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
I didn't look up the original references.
"It is believed that..."
I think.
"It is generally believed that..."
10. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
I didn't look up the original references.
"It is believed that..."
I think.
"It is generally believed that..."
My friends think so too.
11. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
I didn't look up the original references.
"It is believed that..."
I think.
"It is generally believed that..."
My friends think so too.
"Thanks are due to Joe Blow for assistance with the experimental work, and George Fink for valuable discussions.”
12. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
I didn't look up the original references.
"It is believed that..."
I think.
"It is generally believed that..."
My friends think so too.
"Thanks are due to Joe Blow for assistance with the experimental work, and George Fink for valuable discussions.”
Blow did the work. Fink explained to me what it meant.
13. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
I didn't look up the original references.
"It is believed that..."
I think.
"It is generally believed that..."
My friends think so too.
"Thanks are due to Joe Blow for assistance with the experimental work, and George Fink for valuable discussions.”
Blow did the work. Fink explained to me what it meant.
"Correct within an order of magnitude..."
14. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
I didn't look up the original references.
"It is believed that..."
I think.
"It is generally believed that..."
My friends think so too.
"Thanks are due to Joe Blow for assistance with the experimental work, and George Fink for valuable discussions.”
Blow did the work. Fink explained to me what it meant.
"Correct within an order of magnitude..."
Wrong.
15. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
I didn't look up the original references.
"It is believed that..."
I think.
"It is generally believed that..."
My friends think so too.
"Thanks are due to Joe Blow for assistance with the experimental work, and George Fink for valuable discussions.”
Blow did the work. Fink explained to me what it meant.
"Correct within an order of magnitude..."
Wrong.
"A statistically oriented projection..."
16. A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases "It has long been known..."
I didn't look up the original references.
"It is believed that..."
I think.
"It is generally believed that..."
My friends think so too.
"Thanks are due to Joe Blow for assistance with the experimental work, and George Fink for valuable discussions.”
Blow did the work. Fink explained to me what it meant.
"Correct within an order of magnitude..."
Wrong.
"A statistically oriented projection..."
Wild guess.
17. PURPOSE Communicate more effectively
18. PURPOSE Communicate more effectively
Publish more efficiently
20. Communicate effectively
21. To assess reliability of the questionnaire, a test-retest study was conducted. Agreement was high for sociodemographic variables. Reliability of information on chronic conditions was also high. “Do ‘reliability’ and ‘agreement’ mean the same thing?
22. To assess reliability of the questionnaire, a test-retest study was conducted. Agreement Reliability was high for sociodemographic variables. Reliability of information on chronic conditions was also high.
23. To assess reliability of the questionnaire, a test-retest study was conducted. Reliability was high for sociodemographic variables and chronic conditions.
25. of thought
26. If heterosexual transmission was, in fact, the mode of HIV infection for persons who reported other risks as well as heterosexual contact, for persons who are currently reported without risks but who may be reclassified in the future to the heterosexual-contact category, as well as for persons formerly classified as "Pattern II – heterosexually acquired," then 12% of cumulative and 16% of cases reported in 1993 may be attributable to heterosexual transmission.
27. If heterosexual transmission was, in fact, the mode of HIV infection for persons who reported other risks as well as heterosexual contact, for persons who are currently reported without risks but who may be reclassified in the future to the heterosexual-contact category, as well as for persons formerly classified as "Pattern II – heterosexually acquired," then 12% of cumulative and 16% of cases reported in 1993 may be attributable to heterosexual transmission.
28. If heterosexual transmission was, in fact, the mode of HIV infection for persons who reported other risks as well as heterosexual contact, for persons who are currently reported without risks but who may be reclassified in the future to the heterosexual-contact category, as well as for persons formerly classified as "Pattern II – heterosexually acquired," then 12% of cumulative and 16% of cases reported in 1993 may be attributable to heterosexual transmission.
29. SECTIONS OF A SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE
2. ABSTRACT
3. INTRODUCTION
4. METHODS
5. RESULTS
6. DISCUSSION
30. SECTIONS OF A SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE 1. TITLE
2. ABSTRACT
3. INTRODUCTION
4. METHODS
5. RESULTS
6. DISCUSSION
32.
33. List Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) key words under the abstract
Emphasize what is new and useful.
34. Emphasize what is
new and useful.
35. Screening research papers by reading abstracts
“Please get the abstract right, because we may use it alone to assess your paper.”
-- British Medical Journal
36. Reliability of Information on Chronic Disease Risk Factors Collected in the Missouri Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Abstract (initial draft - 183 words)
37. Editing SUBSTANCE
Mistakes
Ambiguity
Missing key info
STYLE
38. PURPOSE The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is widely used by state health agencies to measure the prevalence of chronic disease risk factors. Despite the widespread use of BRFSS, few studies exist on the reliability and validity of BRFSS-collected data. To assess the reliability of the Missouri BRFSS . . .
39. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is widely used by state health agencies to measure the prevalence of chronic disease risk factors. Despite the widespread use of BRFSS, few studies exist on the reliability and validity of BRFSS-collected data. To assess the reliability of the Missouri BRFSS . . . The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is a population-based telephone survey of health-related behaviors among adults ages 18 and older that is used by nearly all state health agencies to measure the prevalence of chronic disease risk factors. Despite widespread use, the reliability of BRFSS-collected data is not well described (understood . . . characterized . . . ). To assess the reliability of the Missouri BRFSS . . .
40. METHODS . . . , a test-retest study was conducted. The authors conducted telephone reinterviews for 222 respondents of completed BRFSS interviews from March and April 1993. The second interview was completed between six and 30 days of the first interview.
41. PASSIVE VOICE Expresses action without specifying who or what performed the action
(the “agent” of the action is omitted)
"James Watson was awarded the Nobel Prize for discovering the molecular structure of DNA.“
42. PASSIVE VOICE Expresses action without specifying who or what performed the action
(the “agent” of the action is omitted)
"James Watson was awarded the Nobel Prize for discovering the molecular structure of DNA.“
vs.
"The Nobel Committee awarded James Watson the Nobel Prize for discovering the molecular structure of DNA."
43. A Controlled Trial of Web-Based Diabetes Disease Management Meigs, JB et al. A Controlled Trial of Web-Based Diabetes Disease Management. Diabetes Care 26:750-757, 2003 One group of physicians (intervention group) was trained to use a web-based information management/ clinical decision support tool. The other group of physicians (control group) was not.
“The study was a group randomized, controlled trial. A coin was tossed to select an intervention group and a control group.”
44. Preventing Pneumococcal Disease Among Infants and Young Children
“All children aged <23 months should be vaccinated with PCV7.”
“Diffuse the locus of responsibility”
45. METHODS . . . , a test-retest study was conducted. The authors conducted Telephone reinterviews were conducted for 222 respondents of completed BRFSS interviews from March and April 1993. The second interview was completed between six and 30 days of the first interview.
46. METHODS . . . , a test-retest study was conducted. Telephone reinterviews were conducted for 222 respondents of completed BRFSS interviews from March and April 1993. The second interview was completed between six and 30 days of the first interview.
47. METHODS . . . , a test-retest study was conducted. Interviews from 222 of 252 respondents (response rate = 88%) who completed the survey during March and April, 1993, were repeated between six and 30 days after the original interview.
48. METHODS . . . , a test-retest study was conducted. Interviews from 222 of 252 respondents (response rate = 88%) who completed the survey during March and April, 1993, were repeated between six and 30 days after the original interview.
49. . . . , a test-retest study was conducted: interviews from 222 of 252 respondents (response rate = 88%) who completed the survey during March and April, 1993, were repeated between six and 30 days after the original interview. . . . interviews from 222 of 252 respondents who completed the survey during March and April, 1993, were repeated 6-30 days after the original interview.
34 words ? 23 words
50. RESULTS Agreement was high for sociodemographic variables (kappa values from 0.85 to 1.00). Reliability of information on chronic conditions and risk factors was also high, with kappa values from 0.82 for hypertension to 1.00 for current smoking status.
Regarding cancer screening practices, reliability was lower for knowledge of the prostate-specific antigen test (kappa = 0.21) than for women's cancer screening practices (i.e., the mammogram and Pap smear).
Questions on attitudes toward environmental tobacco smoke showed lower reliability than did questions on individual actions to reduce exposure to environmental tobacco
51. RESULTS Agreement was high for sociodemographic variables (kappa values from 0.85 to 1.00). Reliability of information on chronic conditions and risk factors was also high, with kappa values from 0.82 for hypertension to 1.00 for current smoking status.
Regarding cancer screening practices, reliability was lower for knowledge of the prostate-specific antigen test (kappa = 0.21) than for women's cancer screening practices (i.e., the mammogram and Pap smear).
Questions on attitudes toward environmental tobacco smoke showed lower reliability than did questions on individual actions to reduce exposure to environmental tobacco
52. RESULTS Agreement was high for sociodemographic variables (kappa values from 0.85 to 1.00). Reliability of information on chronic conditions and risk factors was also high, with kappa values from 0.82 for hypertension to 1.00 for current smoking status.
Regarding cancer screening practices, reliability was lower for knowledge of the prostate-specific antigen test (kappa = 0.21) than for women's cancer screening practices (i.e., the mammogram and Pap smear).
Questions on attitudes toward environmental tobacco smoke showed lower reliability than did questions on individual actions to reduce exposure to environmental tobacco
53. Agreement was high for sociodemographic variables (kappa values from 0.85 to 1.00). Reliability of information on chronic conditions and risk factors was also high, with kappa values from 0.82 for hypertension to 1.00 for current smoking status.
54. Regarding cancer screening practices, reliability was lower for knowledge of the prostate-specific antigen test (kappa = 0.21) than for women's cancer screening practices (i.e., the mammogram and Pap smear).
55. Questions on attitudes toward environmental tobacco smoke showed lower reliability than did questions on individual actions to reduce exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.
56. Reliability was high for sociodemographic variables, chronic conditions and risk factors (kappa > 0.82).Reliability was lower for knowledge of the prostate-specific antigen test (kappa = 0.21) than for women's cancer screening practices (kappa = 0.59 - 0.87). Questions on attitudes toward environmental tobacco smoke (kappa = 0.47- 0.51) showed lower reliability than did questions on individual actions to reduce exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (kappa = 0.62 - 0.82).
57. Reliability was high for sociodemographic variables, chronic conditions and risk factors (kappa > 0.82).Reliability was lower for knowledge of the prostate-specific antigen test (kappa = 0.21) than for women's cancer screening practices (kappa = 0.59 - 0.87). Questions on attitudes toward environmental tobacco smoke (kappa = 0.47- 0.51) showed lower reliability than did questions on individual actions to reduce exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (kappa = 0.62 - 0.82).
58. Reliability was high for sociodemographic variables, chronic conditions and risk factors (kappa > 0.82), lower for cancer screening practices (kappa = 0.59-0.87), and lowest for knowledge about prostate-specific antigen testing (kappa = 0.21). Reliability of questions about attitudes toward environmental tobacco smoke (kappa = 0.47-0.51) was lower than for questions about individual actions to reduce environmental tobacco smoke (kappa = 0.62-0.82).
59. one final detail
60. Reliability was highest for sociodemographic variables, chronic conditions and risk factors (kappa > 0.82), lower for cancer screening practices (kappa = 0.59-0.87), and lowest for knowledge about prostate-specific antigen testing (kappa = 0.21). Reliability of questions about attitudes toward environmental tobacco smoke (kappa = 0.47-0.51) was lower than for questions about individual actions to reduce environmental tobacco smoke (kappa = 0.62-0.82).
61. RESULTS Original – 87 words
Revision – 65 words (and more information)
62. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate the overall flexibility and utility of the BRFSS.
?
We conclude that the reliability of most BRFSS questions is high. New, more reliable, questions to measure knowledge of prostate-specific antigen testing need to be developed.
63. The Abstract Purpose
RELIABILITY
VALIDITY
64. The Abstract Purpose
Methods
RELIABILITY
VALIDITY
RELIABILITY
65. The Abstract Purpose
Methods
Results
RELIABILITY
VALIDITY
RELIABILITY
RELIABILITY
66. The Abstract Purpose
Methods
Results
Conclusions RELIABILITY
VALIDITY
RELIABILITY
RELIABILITY
FLEXIBILITY
UTILITY
67. The Abstract Purpose
Methods
Results
Conclusions RELIABILITY
VALIDITY
RELIABILITY
RELIABILITY
FLEXIBILITY
UTILITY
70. Structured Abstracts
71. Structured Abstracts
72. Structured Abstracts