1 / 34

Electronic Structure and Transport Properties of Iron Compounds: Spin-Crossover Effects.

Electronic Structure and Transport Properties of Iron Compounds: Spin-Crossover Effects. Viktor Struzhkin. Collaborations. M. Eremets, I. Eremets Max-Planck Institute, Mainz, Germany A. Gavriliuk, I. Lyubutin Institute of Crystallography, RAS, Moscow, RUSSIA Optics and Theory

carol-gill
Download Presentation

Electronic Structure and Transport Properties of Iron Compounds: Spin-Crossover Effects.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electronic Structure and Transport Properties of Iron Compounds: Spin-Crossover Effects. Viktor Struzhkin

  2. Collaborations • M. Eremets, I. Eremets • Max-Planck Institute, Mainz, Germany A. Gavriliuk, I. Lyubutin Institute of Crystallography, RAS, Moscow, RUSSIA Optics and Theory A. Goncharov, GL S. Ovchinnikov Institute of Physics, Siberian Branch of RAS, Krasnoyarsk, RUSSIA NFS, XES • W. Sturhahn, J. Zhao, S. Kharlamova, • P. Chow, M. Y. Hu • APS, ANL, Argonne, USA • J. F. Lin • LLNL

  3. Spins and Magnetism P > Pc P < Pc Scope: electronic structure of Fe2+ and Fe3+ in octahedral sites

  4. Theoretical approach • In the Mott-Hubbard theory charge fluctuationsdin djn din-1 djn+1are completely suppressed due to strong exchange and Coulombd - d interactionU • J.Zaanen, G.Sawadzky, J.Allen[PRLett 1985] showed that an another type of charge transfer () can be considered din din+1L, whereL – is a hole inp–valence band of anion • Depending on the ratio of parameters,which are related to hybridizationТ, the system can be (from the point of view the nature of the gapЕgap) : 1)  Mott-Hubbard insulatord-d typeU<(Еgap U), 2)  insulator (or semiconductor)with charge transfer U>(Еgap ), 3) d – metal <U andU<W/2 4)  p – metalU<and<W

  5. Bandwidth- versus filling-controlledmetal-insulator transition(Fujimori)

  6. Mott-Hubbard transition under high pressure: bandwidth control

  7. eg d t2g 10Dq Tanabe-Sugano diagramfor Fe+3ion andSpin crossover Fe3+- LS (S = 1/2) Fe3+- HS (S = 5/2) Usp

  8. Magnetic collapse in transition metal oxides Cohen, Mazin, Isaak, Science 1997 High-spin to low-spin transition I. Jackson and A. E. Ringwood (1981) ΔG = ΔE – PΔV + TΔS ΔE = Nn{π - Δ(r)}, Δ~ Δ0(r0/r)5 For cubic (B1) FeO: Ptr=50 GPa R. E. Cohen et al., MRS Symp proc. 1998

  9. X-ray emission spectroscopy as a local magnetic probe Axial Radial Radial

  10. High-spin to low-spin transition in FeS J.-P. Rueff , C.-C. Kao,V. V. Struzhkin, J. Badro, J. Shu, R. J. Hemley, and H. K. Mao , Phys. Rev. Lett. (1999) Radial

  11. Spin-crossover transition in ferropericlase J. Badro et. al., Science (2003) Mg0.83Fe0.170

  12. Nuclear inelastic scattering set-up (W. Sturhahn, E. Alp, M. Hu)

  13. FeBO3 Mössbauer spectroscopy and NFS (Lyubutin et al.)

  14. 10Dq

  15. Reduced radiative conductivity of low-spin (Mg,Fe)O in the lower mantle A. Goncharov, V. Struzhkin, and S. Jacobsen The observed changes in absorption are in contrast to prediction and are attributed to d-d orbital charge transfer in the Fe2+ ion. The results indicate low-spin (Mg,Fe)O will exhibit lower radiative thermal conductivity than high-spin (Mg,Fe)O, which needs to be considered in future geodynamic models of convection and plume stabilization in the lower mantle.

  16. Theory

  17. Comparison of Mössbauer and X-ray emission results for FeO M. P. Pasternak et al . Phys. Rev. Lett.(1997) J. Badro et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. (1999) Radial

  18. NFS FeO (wüstite)

  19. Magnetic phase diagram of FeO

  20. Insulator-metal transition in FeO 41 GPa 113 GPa

  21. Singe crystals enriched with the Fe-57 isotope Fe3+ Samples: • Fe B O3 • R Fe3(BO3)4(R = Gd) • Y3 Fe5 O12

  22. Y3Fe5O12 Electronic transition Changes in the crystal color under pressure increase and decrease 41 GPa 19 GPa 50 GPa 0 GPa 13 GPa 32 GPa

  23. Structural, magnetic, electronic and spin transitions at high pressures FeBO3 at 53 GPa collapse of the unit-cell volume by ~ 9 % atP = 46 GPathe insulator- semiconductor transition atP = 46 GPa magnetic collapse with the HS LS transition

  24. Structural, electronic and spin transitions at high pressures GdFe3(BO3)4 at 26 GPa collapse of the unit-cell volume by ~ 8 % atP = 43 GPathe insulator- semiconductor transition atP = 43 GPa the HS LS transition

  25. Structural, magnetic, electronic and spin transitions at high pressures Y3Fe5O12 at 48 GPa srtuctural amorphyzation atP = 50-55 GPathe insulator- metal transition atP = 48 GPa magnetic collapse with the HS LS transition

  26. Bi Fe O3 :Multiferroic BiFeO3 - belongs to ferro-magneto-electric materials (multiferroics) which have both a spontaneous electrical polarization and a spontaneous magnetization. Between known multiferroics, it has a record high the antiferromagnetic Neel temperature (TN = 643 K) and the ferroelectric Curie temperature (TC= 1083 K)

  27. BiFeO3 Electronic transition from the insulating to highly conducting state. Mott ? 54.5 GPa 7.2 GPa

  28. BiFeO3 Pressure – temperature dependence of resistivity At 40 – 55 GPa the resistance drops by 107 (metallization)

  29. Structural, magnetic, electronic and spin transitions at high pressures Bi Fe O3 near 45 GPa srtuctural transition atP = 45-55 GPathe insulator- metal transition atP = 47 GPa magnetic collapse with the HS LS transition

  30. Theoretical approach • S. G. Ovchinnikov [JETP Letters, 2003] Main parameter is the effectiveHubbard energyUeff Ueff = E0(d 4) + E0(d 6) - 2 E0(d 5) LPPP < Pc S = 2 S = 2 S = 5/2 HPPP > Pc S = 1 S = 0 S = 1/2

  31. ELECTORON STRUCTURE of FeBO3 and GdFe3(BO3)4 [S.G. Ovchinnikov and S.A. Kharlamova, JETP Letters, 2003; 2004] SECfor Fe: а)d-d- transitions b)charge transfer transitions p6d5 p5d6 electron creation Fe3+  Fe2+: с= E (5Т2, d6) – E (6A1, d5) hole creation Fe3+  Fe4+:=E0(6A1,d5) – E0(6A1,d4) By Raccah parameters : с=d +5 A +14 B – 0.4  =d +4 A – 14 B +0.6 Then the Hubbard effective parameter is: Ueff =c– = А+28В–=4.2 eV

  32. 7 Ueff 4.2 1.45 Density of electronic states of GdFe3(BO3)4 in within multi-electronicp - d model at ambient and high pressure Р Рс ELECTRON STRUCTUREof FeBO3 and GdFe3(BO3)4in MULTIELECTRON MODEL at AMBIENT and HIGH PRESSURE S.G.Ovchinnikov. JETP Lett. (2003) The effective Hubbard parameter: Ueff=c -  = E0(d4)+E0(d6)-2E0(d5) PPc S=2 S=2 S=5/2 PPcS=1 S=0 S=1/2 Ueff =c -  = А+9В-7С 1.45 eV

  33. Theoretical approaches Fe3+ Fe2+ • S. G. Ovchinnikov [JETP Letters, 2003] FeO?

  34. Bandwidth- versus filling-controlledmetal-insulator transition(Fujimori) HS-LS U-control

More Related