chapter 26
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Chapter 26

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 8

Chapter 26 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Chapter 26. Neo-orthodoxy: Karl Barth and others. Questions to be addressed in this chapter. How was existentialism a precursor to neo-orthodoxy ? Who was Karl Barth and why is he considered one of the most important theologians in history?

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Chapter 26' - carl

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
chapter 26

Chapter 26

Neo-orthodoxy: Karl Barth and others

questions to be addressed in this chapter
Questions to be addressed in this chapter
  • How was existentialism a precursor to neo-orthodoxy?
  • Who was Karl Barth and why is he considered one of the most important theologians in history?
  • What are the main points of Barth’s neo-orthodox theology?
  • What are some ways that neo-orthodoxy has had a lasting influence?
s ren kierkegaard existentialist and forerunner to neo orthodoxy
SørenKierkegaard: Existentialist and forerunner to neo-orthodoxy
  • (1813-1855) Danish philosopher/poet who was deeply concerned about the moral laxity of the religious people of Denmark.
  • Christian faith is more about subjective passion than doctrine and dogma.
  • Dogma leads to paradox; real subjective faith confronts individuals with Christ, who must choose for or against him.
karl barth neo orthodox theologian
Karl Barth: neo-orthodox theologian
  • (1886-1968) from Reformed Church in Switzerland.
  • Brought Europe and American theology out of the grip of rationalist Enlightenment thinking.
  • Pastor and professor in Switzerland.
central themes of barth s neo orthodoxy
Central themes of Barth’s neo-orthodoxy
  • Rejection of liberalism: WW2 destroys the liberal optimism of his professors; return to Reformation principles.
  • God’s transcendence, human fallenness, divine revelation.
  • Divine election: Christ is the elected individual, and people could join into this election by following Christ.
neo orthodoxy s lasting influence
Neo-orthodoxy’s lasting influence
  • Hans Urs von Balthasar (1905-1988) was an influential interpreter of Barth to Catholics.
  • Emil Brunner (1889-1966).
  • Reinhold Niebuhr (1893-1971) and his “Christian realism” continue the themes of neo-orthodoxy.
h richard niebuhr s description of liberal theology of the nineteenth century
H. Richard Niebuhr’s description of liberal theology of the nineteenth century

“A God without wrath brought men without sin into a kingdom without judgment through a Christ without a cross” (p. 453).

summary of main points
Summary of main points
  • The Christian existentialism of Søren Kierkegaard required not a rational systematic account of Christian theology, as with liberalism, but rather an authentic faith manifested in a passionate encounter with the living God in Jesus Christ—a central theme of neo-orthodoxy.
  • Karl Barth was a Swiss Reformed theologian who turned from liberal theology and brought about a return to orthodoxy—or what is better dubbed neo-orthodoxy or a “theology from above”—in Christian theology.
  • Some of the central tenets of Barth’s neo-orthodoxy are the rejection of liberal theology, the sovereignty, transcendence and the universal love and grace of God, God’s self-disclosure through the event of Scripture, and election in Christ.
  • The influence of Barth’s neo-orthodoxy continued throughout the twentieth century and down to our own day, impacting both Catholic and Protestant theological luminaries.