1 / 21

Joseph R. Steele, M.D ., Janet Champagne MBA, Garrett L. Walsh, M.D.

Decreasing the Turnaround Time (TAT) of Intra-operative Imaging and Interpretation of Potentially Retained Foreign Objects (RFO). Joseph R. Steele, M.D ., Janet Champagne MBA, Garrett L. Walsh, M.D. UT MD Anderson Cancer Center. Overview.

Download Presentation

Joseph R. Steele, M.D ., Janet Champagne MBA, Garrett L. Walsh, M.D.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Decreasing the Turnaround Time (TAT) of Intra-operative Imaging and Interpretation of Potentially Retained Foreign Objects (RFO) Joseph R. Steele, M.D., Janet Champagne MBA, Garrett L. Walsh, M.D. UT MD Anderson Cancer Center

  2. Overview • RFOs after surgery can present considerable risk and potential patient harm • The rate of RFO ranges from 1/5500 to 1/7000 • Cima RR, et al. J Am CollSurg 2008; 207:80-7 • Egorova NN, et al. Ann Surg 2008;247:13-8 • Considered a sentinel event by the Joint Commission

  3. Project Overview • Joint venture between the Division of Surgery, Perioperative Enterprise and Division of Diagnostic Imaging. • X-ray obtained if post-operative mismatched count occurs. • The turnaround times (TAT) for intra-operative imaging of potential RFOs was felt to be unacceptable by the Division of Surgery, potentially jeopardizing patient care. • A team consisting of OR staff, surgeons, radiologists, administrators and radiology technologists was organized to address and solve the problem.

  4. AIM Statement • Theaim of this project was to decrease the average TAT for imaging and interpretation of potential RFOs to less than 30 minutes within 4 months. • The process begins when the OR calls Diagnostic Imaging requesting an operative radiograph, and ends when the radiologist calls back to the OR with their report.

  5. The RFO Saga

  6. Phase 1: Baseline Data Collection • Improving the RFO TAT was unsuccessfully attempted by a previous CS&E team. • Because of pressure to immediately begin improvement efforts, their data were used as a baseline. Problem #1

  7. Phase 1: Baseline Data Mean TAT = 43 minutes, Not consistent with OR experience

  8. Potential RFO Imaging Process

  9. Potential RFO Imaging Process

  10. Phase 2: Initial Interventions (The Good) TAT improved to 39 minutes and represents a lengthier, complete process. Since there were no complaints, the quality of the exams were assumed to be excellent. (Problem #2)

  11. BIG PROBLEM (The Bad)

  12. Miscount following TRAM flap

  13. Patient returns to EC

  14. Phase 3: Re-engineering (The Ugly) Image acquisition segment of the project is redesigned, resulting in expected disruption. Mean TAT increases to 48 minutes with increased variation.

  15. RFO Redemption

  16. Phase 4: Final Interventions (The Redemption) Mean TAT decreased to 38 minutes, and variation decreased.

  17. Revenue Enhancement • Additional technical charge (OR)- $1200/hr • Savings of approximately $100.00/case • Additional anesthesia charge (OR)- $342/hr • Savings of approximately $28.50/case • Additional professional anesthesia charge (OR) $648/hr • Savings of approximately $54.00/case

  18. Revenue Enhancement • Total annual savings $182.50 X 264 (est.) = $48,180.00 • Avoidance of a RFO and potential litigation PRICELESS

  19. Next Steps • Since we failed to meet our aim the following steps will be undertaken: • Evaluate stage 4 data • Improve communication (OR and DI staff) • Decrease repeat imaging • Initial PDSA cycles until the 30 minute TAT goal is accomplished

  20. Conclusion • Quality improvement is not for the faint of heart. • You don’t know what you don’t know. • Understand what is going on before trying to measure it. • Don’t assume anything. • You don’t need to win every battle to win the war.

More Related