1 / 10

Predicting finger flexion from electrocorticography ( ECoG ) data

Predicting finger flexion from electrocorticography ( ECoG ) data. Roberts Mencis. BCI competition. BCI competition IV, Berlin 2008 Subjects – epilepsy patients ECoG electrode grid implanted Dataglove from 5DT. Goals of project. Understanding neural basis of finger movement

camila
Download Presentation

Predicting finger flexion from electrocorticography ( ECoG ) data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Predicting finger flexion from electrocorticography (ECoG) data Roberts Mencis

  2. BCI competition BCI competition IV, Berlin 2008 Subjects – epilepsy patients ECoG electrode grid implanted Dataglove from 5DT

  3. Goals of project • Understanding neural basis of finger movement • In-depth analysis of data • Prediction model based on data analysis • Better or comparable result with current winners • I place - 0.46 • II place – 0.42 • III place – 0.27

  4. Experimental setup 3 subjects Each experiment – 10 minutes 2 seconds cue, 2 seconds rest ECoG data from 48-62 channels Finger flexion data, 5 channels Sampling rate 1000 Hz

  5. Neuroscience of finger movement Brodmann area 4 (primary motor cortex) Fingers – overlapping areas with hotspot for each finger, somatotopic arrangement Cora-and-surround organisation, typical movements together Small distance between neural hotspots (few mm)

  6. Data analysis For most subjects&fingers at least on channel with 0.3-0.4 correlation between ECoG and finger flexion data

  7. Data analysis Activity in frequency range 60-200 Hz corresponds to finger flexion (for some subjects&fingers) Subject #2, finger #1, channel #24, window size 1000 ms

  8. Data analysis Subject #2, finger #1, channel #24, frequency 110 Hz, correlation 0.4058 Subject #2, finger #1, channel #24, best 20 frequencies, correlation 0.6869

  9. Prediction model For each subject and finger – find best channel-frequency pairs with highest correlation between ECoG and finger flexion training data Determine top N channel-frequency pairs with highest scores whose combination gives best correlation on training data Use those channel-frequency pairs to predict finger flexion from test ECoG data Smooth predicted finger flexion data (moving average) Top channel-frequency pairs:

  10. Way forward… • That could be done to improve results? • More advanced techniques for feature selection • Different machine learning algorithms • Making use of finger flexion data structure (differences between cue-rest phase; fact that generally only one finger is flexed simultaneously etc.) • More time and effort… THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION!

More Related