1 / 34

Note to evaluator…

Note to evaluator….

camila
Download Presentation

Note to evaluator…

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Note to evaluator… The overall purpose of this presentation is to guide evaluators through the completion of step 7 of the UFE checklist and to “level the field” for the simulation (step 8). The main goal is to guide the primary user through the definition of intended outcomes and the selection of required data and appropriate methods to respond to the key evaluation questions. (PLEASE READ THE NOTES SECTION OF THE DIFFERENT SLIDES) Please adapt this presentation to the context of the project that you are evaluating and to your facilitation style.

  2. Facilitating UFE step-by-step: a process guide for evaluators Module 3: Step 7 of UFE checklist Joaquín Navas & Ricardo Ramírez February, 2010

  3. Meeting’s Objetives Review report of previous meeting(s) & validate preliminary KEQ analysis. Define the program’s intended outcomes. Define required data in order to respond to the KEQ. Select appropriate methods for data collection (Step 7 of UFE).

  4. Agenda Discussion on report of previous meeting – validation of preliminary analysis of KEQ. Identification of intended outcomes of the program. Break. Definition of required data. Selection of appropriate data collection methods.

  5. What we have accomplished so far… First draft of KEQ that seems useful to guide the remainder of the evaluation process. First 6 steps of the UFE checklist have been covered. The process has been well documented up to this point.

  6. Comments on Previous Report

  7. Comments on Second Report Does the report describe the process well? Is it worth documenting the process in a very detailed manner? Are you happy with the KEQ? Is the analysis presented on the report valid?

  8. KEQ Validation Analysis

  9. Project’s specific objectives This slide is only for reference in case someone in the audience needs to look at the objectives to discuss the table on slide #8. Objective #1. Objective #2. Objective #3.

  10. (Adapted from Dart, 2007) Categories of key evaluation questions This slide is only for reference in case someone in the audience needs to look at the KEQ categories to discuss the table on slide #8. INPUT / RESOURCES IMPACT OUTCOMES APPROACH / MODEL PROCESS QUALITY COST- EFFECTIVENESS

  11. What makes good KEQs? (adapted from Dart, 2007) Specific enough to be useful in guiding you through the evaluation Broad enough to be broken down - are not the same as a question in a survey Data (qualitative/quantitative) can be brought to bear on the KEQ KEQs are open questions (can’t answer yes or no!) Have meaning for those developing the plan Lead to useful, credible, evaluation There aren’t too many of them (2-4 is enough). This slide is only for reference in case someone in the audience needs to look at the desired KEQ features to discuss the table on slide #8.

  12. Utilization-Focused Outcomes Framework as roadmap Desired outcomes for the target group Outcome Indicators DO NOT SHOW THIS SLIDE Participant target group KEQ Performance Targets Details of data collection How results will be used Adapted from Patton (2008: 243-251): Utilization-Focused Outcomes Framework

  13. The trajectory of change… CONTROL & PREDICTION INPUT / RESOURCES ▼ ACTIVITIES ▼ OUPUTS ▼ OUTCOMES ▼ IMPACT / RESULTS ?

  14. Focusing on outcomes (1/17) DESIRED/EXPECTED OUTCOMES Desired or expected outcomes that would result from the program subject of this evaluation. What are you trying to achieve with your program? What type of changes do you want to see in the program participants in terms of behaviour, attitude, knowledge, skills, status, etc?

  15. Focusing on outcomes (2/17) DESIRED/EXPECTED OUTCOMES

  16. BREAK

  17. Focusing on outcomes (3/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION ¿What data do you need in order to answer the KEQs?

  18. Focusing on outcomes (4/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION

  19. Focusing on outcomes (5/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION ¿What methods could be used to collect the required data?

  20. Focusing on outcomes (6/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION There is no magic key to tell you the most appropriate method to answer your KEQ. All methods have limitations, so try using a combination of methods. Each type of question suits specific approaches/methods – so let them guide you. Other factors to consider: time, cost, resources, knowledge. Primary users should the one to determine what constitutes credible evidence. The primary user should feel comfortable with the selected methods and the collected data. Adapted from Dart, 2007.

  21. Focusing on outcomes(7/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN METHODS AND QUESTION CATEGORIES Impact: Contribution Analysis / Data trawl & expert panel / GEM. Outcomes: OM / MSC / GEM. Approach/Model: Comparative studies of different approaches. Process: Evaluation study: interview process, focus groups. Quality: Audit against standards, peer review. Cost-effectiveness: Economic modeling Adapted from Dart, 2007.

  22. Focusing on outcomes (8/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION – METHODS SUMMARY (1/3) Contribution Analysis: Seeks for evidence to show evidence between a given activity and an outcome in order to show change trends that have resulted from an intervention. Does not intend to show linear causality. Data Trawl: Data search and analysis from disperse literature in order to identify relationships between activities and outcomes. http://www.kimointernational.org/DataTrawl.aspx GEM (Gender Evaluation Methodology): Links gender and ICT through relevant indicators. Read more: http://www.apcwomen.org/gem/

  23. Focusing on outcomes (9/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION – METHODS SUMMARY (2/3) Outcome Mapping: Focuses on mid-term outcomes, suggesting that in the best case scenario these outcomes will lead to long-term impact in a non-linear way. Read more: http://www.outcomemapping.ca Most Significant Change: Seeks to identify most significant changes based on participants´ stories. Read more: http://www.kstoolkit.org/Most+Significant+Change Expert panels: Group of experts is invited to comment and analyze outcomes and how they relate to possible impacts. Read more: http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/EIUA/reda/

  24. Focusing on outcomes (10/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION – METHODS SUMMARY (2/3) Comparative studies of different approaches: Self-explanatory. Interview process: Interviews on how participants experienced the process of the project subject of the evaluation. Focus Groups: Self-explanatory. Audit against standards: This might refer to a comparative analysis against specific standards. Peer reviews: Self-explanatory. Economic Modeling: Not sure what this method refers to.

  25. Focusing on outcomes (11/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION Given the primary intended USES of the evaluation, do you think that the results that will be obtained with these methods will be : Credible (accurate)? Reliable (consistent)? Valid (true, believable and correct)?

  26. Focusing on outcomes (12/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION Do you think that these methods are : Cost-effective? Practical? Ethical?

  27. Focusing on outcomes (13/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION ¿Do you think that you will be able to use the results that you will obtain by the selected methods according to the purposes and intended uses that you defined earlier in the process?

  28. Focusing on outcomes (14/17) Evaluation purposes Findings’ primary intended uses Knowledge generation To identify patterns of effectiveness. This is just an example, please adapt to your particular scenario. DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION Formative improvement and learning To improve the program subject of the evaluation. Program development To adapt interventions to emerging conditions.

  29. Focusing on outcomes (15/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION Who will do the data collection? How will you, as primary users, be involved in the data collection?

  30. Focusing on outcomes (16/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION Will the data collection be based on a sample? How do you think the sampling should be done? Who will do it?

  31. Focusing on outcomes (17/17) DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION Who will manage and analyze collected data? How will you, as primary users, be involved in data management and analysis?

  32. Conclusions and next steps

  33. Conclusions and next steps (for the evaluator only)

  34. References Patton, M.Q. (2008). Utilization focused evaluation, 4th Edition. Sage. Dart, J. 2007. “Key evaluation questions”. Presentation at the Evaluation in Practice Workshop. Kualal Lumpur, December.http://evaluationinpractice.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/keyquestionschoices.pdf

More Related