1 / 14

Strategies to reach flexibility

Fragmentation? The future of work in Europe in a global economy Roma, 8 – 9 October 2008. Strategies to reach flexibility. Key findings on employment relations and work organisation in work package 12.3. Ursula Holtgrewe | FORBA, Vienna.

Download Presentation

Strategies to reach flexibility

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fragmentation? The future of work in Europe in a global economy Roma, 8 – 9 October 2008 Strategies to reach flexibility Key findings on employment relations and work organisation in work package 12.3 Ursula Holtgrewe | FORBA, Vienna

  2. Organisation theory: dilemma of flexibility versus efficiency (Thompson 1967)‏Flexibility may be something companies want to get rid of! Increasing competition between segments (Rubery 2006)‏ Increasing contradictions between purposes and unintended outcomes Flexibility and restructuring: common assumptions and challenges • Flexibility as a general requirement on global, saturated ... markets • Outsourcing to increase numerical flexibility while retaining functional flexibility and commitment of core segment („flexible firm”, Atkinson 1984)‏ • Increasingly networked production to increase functional flexibility (Powell 1990)

  3. Flexibility and restructuring: General findings • Restructuring of value chains does not always increase flexibility but may have other aims: • cost-cutting • Closeness to markets/customers • Access to knowledge • Requirements for flexibility may be passed on along the lines of power and position in the chain. • Intendedly or unintendedly, restructuring generates its own demands for flexibility.

  4. Relocations and flexibility • Initially, mostly relocation of standardised and operative functions and processes: • Clothing: Taylorised production • Software: coding and testing • Spatial distance limits flexibility and responsiveness • Quality problems • communication • logistics

  5. Flexible employment • Embedded with national labour market institutions (fx DK flexicurity, AT Freelance contracts)‏ - no overall patterns • Traditional, numerically flexible arrangements (= secondary labour markets)‏ • Seasonal work in food industry (segmented along ethnic lines)‏ • Clothing: Small businesses and informal sector in Italy • Initial fixed-term contracts in public sector

  6. Flexible employment • New options • Public sector & services: outsourcing to escape secure and tenured employment • Meat Inc. DK: deboning relocated to East Germany, employment of fixed-term, temporary Polish migrants • Business-Software DE: implementation on customer sites left to consultancies and self-employed consultants = Proactively seeking access to new, lower-cost employee groups (where numerical flexibility comes cheaper)‏

  7. Flexible work organisation • Expansion of value chains – multiplication of interfaces • Standardisation/Modularisation enabling further outsourcing • Emerging specialists for flexibility (in particular business functions)‏ • Call centres (numerically and functionally)‏ • Intermediaries in clothing or research (functional)‏ • New interfacing jobs and transactional labour • Intended and unintended externalisations to lower end of value chain

  8. Flexible work organisation: standardisation • technological/hierarchical/contractual specification of products and services (fx service level agreements)‏ • (Remote) surveillance • Workflow systems across companies • Documentation • Often at odds with “real” work

  9. Work complexity • Uneven picture (increase in Northern countries/NL, decrease UK, DE, IT, ES)‏ • Source: Greenan, Kalugina & Walkowiak, 2007: 33

  10. Flexible work organisation: ad-hoc flexibility • Standardisation complemented/compensated by contextualisation and tacit knowledge (at both ends of value chain)‏: how to interpret an SLA or specification ... • Multiplication of perspectives • Research & marketing • Customer relationship, problem solving and contracts with clients • Interfaces up and down value chain • BUT Overall speed-up of work

  11. Limitations to flexibility • Space • limited mobility of workers • Logistics of global relocation (nearshoring rather than global lowest cost)‏ • Time • Overall speed-up of work • Time to develop co-operation and trust • Standardisation  Contextualisation • Particular workers‘ bargaining power

  12. Mapping restructuring and flexibility

  13. References • Atkinson, J. (1984): 'Manpower strategies for flexible organisations', Personnel Management, vol. 16, n° 8, p. 28-31. • Flecker, J., Holtgrewe, U., Schönauer, A. & Gavroglou, S. P. (2008): 'Value chain restructuring and company strategies to reach flexibility. WORKS deliverable 12.3', Wien. • Greenan, N., Kalugina, E. & Walkowiak, E. (2007): 'The transformation of work? D9.2.2 of the WORKS project - Trends in work organisation', Centre d'Etudes de l'Emploi, Noisy-le-Grand. • Powell, W. W. (1990): 'Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization', in Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (eds.): Research in organizational behavior vol. 12, JAI Press, Greenwich CT, p. 295-336. • Rubery, J. (2005): 'Labor Markets and Flexibility', in Ackroyd, S. et al. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization, Oxford UP, Oxford, p. 31-51. • Rubery, J. (2006): Segmentation theory thirty years on, European Work and Employment Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, vxu.se/ehv/cafo/iwplms/papers/rubery_segmentation.doc. • Thompson, J. D. (1967): Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill, New York et al.

  14. Thank you!

More Related