1 / 26

Rochester Physics Analysis Activities on CMS

Rochester Physics Analysis Activities on CMS. Henning Fl ä cher for the Rochester CMS Group. Outline: Physics Analysis Activities Jet and ME T Commissioning Dijet Resonances Dijet Centrality Ratio SUSY Multi -jet + ME T Searches Conclusions. DOE Site Visit - 2 nd Sep . 2010.

Download Presentation

Rochester Physics Analysis Activities on CMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rochester Physics Analysis Activities on CMS Henning Flächer for the Rochester CMS Group • Outline: • Physics Analysis Activities • Jet and METCommissioning • Dijet Resonances • Dijet Centrality Ratio • SUSY Multi-jet + MET Searches • Conclusions DOE Site Visit - 2nd Sep. 2010

  2. Overview of Group Activities • Group Members • Analysis Preparation • Jet and Missing Energy (MET) Commissioning • Profit from groups hardware and detector commissioning experience • Hadron Calorimeter & Silicon Tracker • Calorimeter Noise Studies • Jet Reconstruction Performance and comparison of Jet algorithms • Jet Quality (Jet ID) • Jet based missing energy Studies (MHT) • Physics Analyses (early discovery) • Dijet Resonances • Dijet Centrality Ratio • Susy Multi-Jet and Missing Energy Search Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  3. CMS Physics Analysis Group • Teaching Faculty: • Demina (PI) • Bodek (PI) • Slattery (PI) • Melissinos (PI) • Garcia-Bellido • Postdocs: • Cammin ???(until Feb 09) • Chung • Flaecher • Gotra • Harel • Han • Goldenzweig • Senior Scientists: • Zielinski • de Barbaro • Sakumoto • Budd • Graduate students: • Miner • Orbaker??? • Betchart • Vishnevsky • Eshaq • Undergraduates: • Qi • Pedro • Moolekamp Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  4. Jet Commissioning: Algorithms • CMS Jet Algorithms group -- Zielinskia co-convener since 2007 • Jet algorithms define the procedure to cluster input objects: partons, particles, calo towers, tracks • We led algorithmic studies of jet performance and validation • Based on this work, in 2009 CMS adopted Anti-KT algorithm as the default jet reconstruction for LHC data • Hareldeveloped jet quality criteria for calorimeter jets • Reconstructing jets in calorimeter: • Cells contribute to tower energy if they pass energy thresholds • Current thresholds (Scheme 6) for CMS software developed with strong Rochester contributions (Zielinski,Qi) based on measurements of HCAL performance in Global Runs(Miner,de Barbaro, Vishnevsky) • New thresholds significantly improve performance of calorimeter jets with respect to old Scheme B • Implemented in RECO in fall of 2009, and in High Level Trigger in spring 2010 • Jet reconstruction using tracks under development(Garcia-Bellido, Eshaq) CMS AN-2010/024 CMS AN-2010/067, AN-2009/087, PAS JME-08-008 Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  5. Jet Performance at 7 TeV CMS AN-2010/121 PAS JME-10-003 • JME-10-003: “Jet Performance in pp Collisions at √s= 7 TeV” • Public CMS document for ICHEP • Based on Lint~75 nb-1 of 7 TeV data • Co-edited by Zielinski • Very broad range of jet performance studies • Jet energy corrections • MC-truth JEC • In-situ calibration: • Offset correction • Relative response • Absolute response • Jet resolutions • MC-truth Jet pT resolutions • Data-driven jet pT resolutions • Jet position resolutions • Relative jet responses and resolutions (Zielinski, Pedro, Garcia-Bellido) CMS AN-2010/134 PAS JME-10-003 Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  6. Jet Quality Criteria:Jet ID Harel • Brought JetID studies to publication as CMS Physics Analysis Papers: • Jet ID studies for early physics – PAS JME-09-008 • Jet commissioning note – PAS JME-10-001 • New study: Developed detailed Jet ID for the forward region • Only calorimetry information available • Noise samples collected with LHC operating, in empty bunch crossings • Adopted by analysers of forward jet production, e.g., CMS DP-2010/026 • Fully integrated with CMS reconstruction and analysis frameworks • Recommended by JetMET as CMS standard Simulated physical jets effective noise sample Analogue of EM fraction Loose Tight Selection Data from empty bunch crossings Optimized at each energy: entries normalized in each “x” slice Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  7. Demina, Flaecher, Betchart Missing Energy Commissioning • Missing energy performance in MinBias and dijet events • Co-edited by Flaecher • Rochester contribution • Commission missing energy inferred from jet measurements • Redundancy by comparing different approaches to jet reconstruction • HT and MHT distribution well behaved – no long tails • CMS approved documents: • JME-10-002 (0.9 & 2.36 TeV) JME-10-004 (7 TeV) Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  8. Phenomenology Connections: LPC and CTEQ • We are involved in CTEQ and LPC • LPC is a major USCMS center for analysis • We have trained many students at LPC (Demina, Zielinski) • CTEQ aims to provide guidance to LHC collaborations concerning Standard Model issues and backgrounds to searches for New Physics • Zielinskiis CTEQ member since 2006 and active at LPC since 2004 • On Organizing Committee for the first CTEQ Workshop on LHC Physics 2007 • Lecturing on jet issues at CTEQ Summer School 2007 • CTEQ-LPC liaison for the joint Workshop on Higgs Physics at LHC and Tevatron, 2009 • Co-organizer of the visit of several CTEQ members at LPC as part of the “Experimentalist/Theorist of the Week” program in March 2010 • On Organizing Committee for the workshop on “Standard Model Benchmarks at the Tevatron and LHC” – joint venue between the three CMS LPC’s, Argonne, and Fermilab in Nov 2010 Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  9. New Physics Searches at LHC Ratio of LHC/TeV Parton-Parton Lumi in pb • Rochester is involved in early discovery analyses • Dijet Resonances • Dijet Centrality Ratio • Susy Multi-Jet and Missing Energy Search • Jet Pairs and SUSY particles are expected to be produced via strong interaction in LHC • Production rates are large • Quickly surpass Tevatron sensitivity gg gq qq Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  10. Search for Dijet Resonances in Mjj • Heavy particles decaying to dijets could be observed as resonant peaks in the dijet mass spectrum • Such resonances are predicted by various theory models of physics beyond Standard Model • This approach complements the searches using the Dijet Centrality Ratio • Using the luminosity of836nb-1 CMS has established upper limits on the production of several resonance types at 7 TeV • In particular, we exclude a string resonance with mass M < 2.1 TeV at 95% CL – currently the best limit • We expect to exceed the Tevatron limits for other resonances with several pb-1 of data (Zielinski) CMS AN-2010/108 PAS EXO-10-010 Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  11. Dijet centrality ratio Harel, Miner Dijet angular distributions distinguish between: • Observable: • Measure as a function of dijet invariant mass • Simple measure of angular distribution • Robust with respect to systematic uncertainties t-channel s-channel production • Discovery observable for hadronic contact interactions • Sensitive to resonant dijetproduction Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  12. Harel, Miner Dijet centrality ratio measurement • Developed tools for the statistical analysis. • Test of QCD models • p-value of our consistency test statistic is 0.8 for corrected NLO and 0.7 for PythiaNLO/LO • Set CLS limits with an LLR observable • We exclude Λ<1.86TeV at 95% CL • Expected exclusion ~1.3TeV • Tevatron exclusion 2.8TeV • Will reach Tevatron limit with ~4pb-1 • Exclusion for a 500GeV q* resonance still only at ~90% CL PAS EXO-10-002 Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  13. Commissioning for SUperSYmmetry • SUSY signatures are challenging and involve multiple objects (jets, leptons, photons) accompanied by missing energy • SUSY events come from a variety of triggers • Good understanding of the detector and data flow is crucial for SUSY searches • SUSY Commissioning group was organized with this goal in mind • Demina was asked to co-lead this effort • Flaecher leading SUSY Prompt Validation Team. • Responsibilities involve: • Verification of the key variables (e.g. missing energy) using cosmic and early collision data • Defining triggers and data sets, ensuring efficient access to data • Prompt monitoring of variables relevant for SUSY searches • Established close coordination with detector performance and physics objects groups TRENDPLOT MET 95% Quantile Demina, Flaecher,Betchart Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  14. Demina Flaecher Betchart SUSY: Jets + Missing Energy Search • CMS SUSY group is organised based on signatures • Reference Analyses based on jets, leptons, photons • Rochester group’s focus is on: • Search for a missing energy signature in multi-jet events • Large sensitivity due to high cross section • Signal is evidence for a Dark Matter candidate (WIMP) • Production of WIMP in cascade decays of heavy new particles • WIMP escapes the detector and remains undetected => missing energy signature • WIMP candidate in many models: • SuperSymmetry, Extra Dimensions, Little Higgs, Technicolor • New approach to Jets + MET searches using kinematic variable αT • Fordijets: • ForMultijets: recombine jets to form dijet system • Main background: QCD events • For ideal QCD dijets: αT = 0.5 • For mismeasured QCD: αT < 0.5 • Approved CMS studies: • PAS-SUS-08/005, SUS-09-001, SUS-10-001 • Extension of PTRD-II studies to dijet topology • Analysis does not rely on calorimetric MET • MHT inferred from measured jets • well suited for early data Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  15. Demina Flaecher Betchart αT analysis with multi-jets • CMS SUSY Reference Analysis • Require and αT > 0.55 • Still clear separation of QCD from signal after jet recombination • αT cut value motivated by underlying physics • Expected event yields for selected benchmark signal points for 10 pb-1 @ 7 TeV • LM0/LM1: mSugra points beyond Tevatron reach • Signal/Background ~ 4 - 7 • Negligible contribution from QCD • αT edge stable under systematic variations (e.g. severe jet mismeasurements) • Improve on Tevatron with ~10pb-1, publication in 2010 dijet >=3 jets Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  16. Outlook on Sensitivity • αT Analysis: exceed Tevatron limits with 10pb-1 • Constraining Parameter Space of New Physics Models, e.g. SUSY • Simultaneous fit of CMSSM parameters m0, m1/2, A0, tanβ (μ>0) to more than 30 collider and cosmology data • Low energy data → Flavour physics, g-2 • High energy data → Precision EW Obs., MW, Mtop • Cosmology and Astroparticle data → relic density • Probe squark masses of ~600 GeV and gluino masses of > 500 GeV with 100 pb-1 • Probe squark masses of ~850-1000 GeV and gluino masses of ~600-900 GeV with 1 fb-1 • 1fb-1 by end of 2011 run • Complementary to direct Dark Matter Searches 5σ discovery 0% systematic 25% systematic 50% systematic L=10pb-1 1fb-1 100pb-1 MasterCode Collaboration – Flaecher et al. Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  17. More u quarks than d quarks in the proton. W asymmetry measures the d/u ratio at small x W/Z physics – W asymmetry Pt>10 GeVExpected error with 25 pb-1 Pt>20 GeV With 25 pb-1 our expected W asymmetry errors match PDF errors (4000 W’s per pb-1 ) Current CMS data as of July 21,2010: 78 nb-1 [Aug. 31, 2010 we have ~ 3 pb-1] So with 100 pb-1 (expected mid 2011), we can constrain d/u at small x and reduce PDF uncertainties at the LHC

  18. Z/Drell-Yann Physics Z/DY physics : 340 Z dimuon events as of Aug.15, 2010. Z Mass distribution. W Transverse Mass distribution. We now have 340 Zs in 1 pb-1 of data (mu-mu channel) Note: Z cross section is factor of 10 smaller than W cross section. So need a factor of 10 more luminosity. For 1 fb-1 (end of 2011) we expect ~0.4 Million Z’s and ~4 Million W’s. 18

  19. Z/DY Physics with 1fb-1(end of 2011) 2. Measure Z angular coefficients. We will have similar statistics as the Tevatron, so compare to theory and to CDF measurements at the Tevatron, and determine fraction of Compton vsq-qbar processes. Dilution for A4=3/8(Afb) different for different QCD Monte Carlos. ( 0.4 Million DY/Z’s and 4 Million W’s). 1. Compare Afb and dN/dM to SM expectation (y>1). LHC not yet competitive with Tevatron

  20. Conclusions • Coherent physics programme building on hardware and algorithm expertise • Covering different aspects of early LHC physics: • Dijet Mass Distribution • Improved limit on String resonances with 120nb-1, excited quarks to follow soon • Dijet ratio • Sensitivity to Contact Interactions and Excited Quarks • Limit with 120nb-1, expect to surpass Tevatron limit with 4pb-1 • Electroweak Physics • test and constrain Parton Distribution Functions • Start to improve PDFs with >25pb-1 • Leading SUSY Commissioning Activities • developed good understanding of detector and Jet/MET quantities • Prompt monitoring of quantities relevant for SUSY searches • Leading role in multi-jet SUSY analysis • New approach using αT variable • “SUSY Reference Analysis” – targeted as first CMS SUSY publication with ~10pb-1 • Surpass Tevatron limits for many searches with O(10) pb-1 • Group is fully involved in 7 TeV data analysis! Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  21. BACKUP Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  22. Jet Studies for SUSY PAS JME-10-003 • One of the major backgrounds to SUSY searches in hadronic channels comes from mismeasured jets in QCD multi-jet events • Jet response distributions exhibit non-Gaussian tails due to detector effects and heavy flavor decays • This can lead to a large fake Missing ET • We are involved in • Determination of jet response distributions from CMS simulation • Development of data-driven method to measure response shapes from photon+jet events • Studies of various contributions to jet resolutions and their tails • Studies of the impact of jet resolution tails on Missing ET (Zielinski, Pedro, Garcia-Bellido) CMS AN-2010/151 Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  23. Search for Dijet Resonances in Mjj • Heavy particles decaying to dijets could be observed as resonant peaks in the dijet mass spectrum • Such resonances are predicted by various theory models of physics beyond Standard Model • This approach complements the searches using the Dijet Centrality Ratio • Using the luminosity of 120 nb-1 CMS has established upper limits on the production of several resonance types at 7 TeV • In particular, we exclude a string resonance with mass M < 1.67 TeV at 95% CL – currently the best limit • We expect to exceed the Tevatron limits for other resonances with several pb-1 of data (Zielinski) CMS AN-2010/108 PAS EXO-10-001 Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  24. A first look at systematics • To get a rough idea: • Jet energy scale variation by +- 10% for QCD MC • Data-MC agree within these uncertainties • More detailed studies to follow >=3 jets Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  25. Outlook on Sensitivity • Exceed Tevatron limits with 10pb-1 • 0% systematic • 25% systematic • 50% systematic L=10pb-1 • Probesquark masses of ~600 GeV and gluino masses of > 500 GeV with 100 pb-1 • Probe squark masses of ~850-1000 GeV and gluino masses of ~600-900 GeV with 1 fb-1 • 1fb-1 by end of 2011 run Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

  26. Phenomenology:Constraining parameter spaceof MSSM JHEP 0809:117(2008), Eur.Phys.J.C64:391-415(2009), Phys.Rev.D 81,035009(2010) O.Buchmueller, R.Cavanaugh, A.DeRoeck, J.R.Ellis, H.F.,S.Heinemeyer, G.Isidori, K.A.Olive, P.Paradisi, F.J.Ronga, G.Weiglein • Combine as much experimental information as possible to constrain New Physics models! • Famous example: SM fit to electroweak precision data • Extend it to include New Physics models • Minimal SuperSymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) • What observables are used to constrain the model? • Low energy (precision) data → Flavour physics, g-2 • High energy (precision) data → Precision EW Obs. • Cosmology and Astroparticle data → relic density • Simultaneous fit of CMSSM parameters m0, m1/2, A0, tanβ (μ>0) to more than 30 collider and cosmology data • e.g. MW, Mtop, g-2, BR(B→Xγ), relic density σpSI: spin-independent dark matter - WIMP elastic scattering cross section on a free proton. 68% CL 95% CL “CMSSM fit clearly favors low-mass SUSY” WIMP Mass [GeV] Henning Flaecher DOE Site Visit

More Related