Forces and prediction of protein structure
Download
1 / 53

Forces and Prediction of Protein Structure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 75 Views
  • Uploaded on

Forces and Prediction of Protein Structure. Ming-Jing Hwang ( 黃明經 ) Institute of Biomedical Sciences Academia Sinica. http://gln.ibms.sinica.edu.tw/. Sequence - Structure - Function.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Forces and Prediction of Protein Structure ' - callie


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Forces and prediction of protein structure

Forces and Prediction of Protein Structure

Ming-Jing Hwang (黃明經)

Institute of Biomedical Sciences

Academia Sinica

http://gln.ibms.sinica.edu.tw/


Sequence structure function
Sequence - Structure - Function

MADWVTGKVTKVQNWTDALFSLTVHAPVLPFTAGQFTKLGLEIDGERVQRAYSYVNSPDNPDLEFYLVTVPDGKLSPRLAALKPGDEVQVVSEAAGFFVLDEVPHCETLWMLATGTAIGPYLSILR


Sequence structure gap
Sequence/Structure Gap

Current (May 26, 2005) entries in protein sequence and structure database:

  • SWISS-PROT/TREMBL : 181,821/1,748,002

  • PDB : 31,059

Sequence

Structure


Structure prediction methods
Structure Prediction Methods

Homology modeling

Fold recognition

ab initio

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

% sequence identity


Levinthal s paradox 1969
Levinthal’s paradox (1969)

  • If we assume three possible states for every flexible dihedral angle in the backbone of a 100-residue protein, the number of possible backbone configurations is 3200. Even an incredibly fast computational or physical sampling in 10-15 s would mean that a complete sampling would take 1080 s, which exceeds the age of the universe by more than 60 orders of magnitude.

  • Yet proteins fold in seconds or less!

Berendsen


Energy landscapes of protein folding
Energy landscapes of protein folding

Borman, C&E News, 1998


Levitt’s lecture for S*




Other factors
Other factors

  • Formation of 2nd elements

  • Packing of 2nd elements

  • Topologies of fold

  • Metal/co-factor binding

  • Disulfide bond


Ab initio new fold prediction
Ab initio/new fold prediction

  • Physics-based (laws of physics)

  • Knowledge-based (rules of evolution)

















1 microsecond md simulation
1-microsecond MD simulation

980ns

  • villin headpiece

  • 36 a.a.

  • 3000 H2O

  • 12,000 atoms

  • 256 CPUs (CRAY)

  • ~4 months

  • single trajectory

Duan & Kollman, 1998


Protein folding by md
Protein folding by MD

PROTEIN FOLDING:A Glimpse of the Holy Grail?

Herman J. C. Berendsen*

"The Grail had many different manifestations throughout its long history, and many have claimed to possess it or its like". We might have seen a glimpse of it, but the brave knights must prepare for a long pursuit.



Massively distributed computing

Letters to nature (2002)

  • engineered protein (BBA5)

  • zinc finger fold (w/o metal)

  • 23 a.a.

  • solvation model

  • thousands of trajectories each of 5-20 ns, totaling 700 ms

  • [email protected]

  • 30,000 internet volunteers

  • several months, or ~a million CPU days of simulation


Energy landscapes of protein folding1
Energy landscapes of protein folding

Borman, C&E News, 1998


Protein folding prediction technique
Protein-folding prediction technique

CGU: Convex Global

Underestimation

- K. Dill’s group


Challenges of physics based methods
Challenges of physics-based methods

  • Simulation time scale

  • Computing power

  • Sampling

  • Accuracy of energy functions


Structure prediction methods1
Structure Prediction Methods

Homology modeling

Fold recognition

ab initio

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

% sequence identity



Fold recognition
Fold recognition

Find, from a library of folds, the 3D template

that accommodates the target sequence best.

Also known as “threading” or “inverse folding”

Useful for twilight-zone sequences







Pitfalls of comparative modeling
Pitfalls of comparative modeling

  • Cannot correct alignment errors

  • More similar to template than to true structure

  • Cannot predict novel folds


Ab initio new fold prediction1
Ab initio/new fold prediction

  • Physics-based (laws of physics)

  • Knowledge-based (rules of evolution)


From 1d 2d 3d
From 1D  2D  3D

Primary

LGINCRGSSQCGLSGGNLMVRIRDQACGNQGQTWCPGERRAKVCGTGNSISAYVQSTNNCISGTEACRHLTNLVNHGCRVCGSDPLYAGNDVSRGQLTVNYVNSC

seq. to str. mapping

Secondary(fragment)

Tertiary

fragment assembly



One lab dominated in casp4

One group dominates the ab initio (knowledge-based) prediction

One lab dominated in CASP4


Some casp4 successes
Some CASP4 successes prediction

Baker’s group



Science 2003 prediction



Structure prediction servers
Structure prediction servers prediction

http://bioinfo.pl/cafasp/list.html


Thank you

Thank You! prediction


ad