1 / 19

FERRARA`S GROUP DISCUSSION 29-04-08

FERRARA`S GROUP DISCUSSION 29-04-08. COMPARISON BETWEEN OLD NTUPLA vs THE NEW ONE. OLD NTUPLA vs NEW GEOMETRY (GAUSS V30R4) ALL PADS (WITHOUT CORRECTION X DIFFERENT Z). COLUMN`S EDGES, REGION R4, 6 PADS X CHAMBER.

callie-garrett
Download Presentation

FERRARA`S GROUP DISCUSSION 29-04-08

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FERRARA`S GROUP DISCUSSION29-04-08 COMPARISON BETWEEN OLD NTUPLA vs THE NEW ONE

  2. OLD NTUPLA vs NEW GEOMETRY (GAUSS V30R4) ALL PADS (WITHOUT CORRECTION X DIFFERENT Z) COLUMN`S EDGES, REGION R4, 6 PADS X CHAMBER Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  3. OLD GEOMETRY BOTHGAUSS V25R12 vs NEW GAUSS V30R4 ALL PADS (WITHOUT CORRECTION X DIFFERENT Z) Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  4. NEW GEO vs OLD GEO, NEW GAUSS BOTH, ALL PADS Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  5. OLD GEO vs NEW GEO ALL PADS WITH Z CORRECTION IN THE CTALK SELECTION Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  6. OLD GEO vs NEW GEO JUST FIRST PAD SELECTED Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  7. NEW GEOMETRYZ CORRECTION vs JUST FIRST PAD SELECTED Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  8. OLD GEOMETRYGAUSS V25R12 vs GAUSS V30R4 JUST FIRST PAD SELECTED (1/2) Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  9. OLD GEOMETRYGAUSS V25R12 vs GAUSS V30R4 JUST FIRST PAD SELECTED (2/2) Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  10. Residual differences between old ntupla and old geometry with new gauss just first pad selected OLD NEW Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  11. CONCLUSIONS The problem of the Xpad-XMChit`s jumps between adiacent columns seems to be due mainly to a bad selection of the events with CTALK. The condition: if(z[i]!=0 && z[i]== z_CT[iMS]) cuts the events that have geometrical crosstalk between adiacent columns and rows of chambers. 2.Since the Xpad-XMChit distributions are almost the same (see slide 8), why the residual distribution it`s worse than before (same geometry, should be the same pad selection). It`s just related with the new more realistic binning than in the past? 3. Suggestion in order to unselect the pads at the edges of the chambers: To fix M2-M3 instead of M1-M5, in these way we don`t need to rebin 4. Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  12. SPARES Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  13. OLD NTUPLA vs NEW GEOMETRY (GAUSS V30R4) ALL PADS (WITHOUT CORRECTION X DIFFERENT Z) Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  14. OLD NTUPLAvsOLD GEOMETRY (NEW GAUSS V30R4) ALL PADS (WITHOUT CORRECTION X DIFFERENT Z) Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  15. NEW GEO vs OLD GEO, NEW GAUSS X BOTH, ALL PADS Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  16. OLD NTUPLAvsNEW GEOMETRY ALL PADS WITH CORRECTION X DIFFERENT Z IN THE CTALK SELECTION Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  17. OLD NTUPLA vs NEW GEOMETRY JUST FIRST PAD SELECTED Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  18. NEW GEOMETRYZ CORRECTION vs JUST FIRST PAD SELECTED Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

  19. OLD GEOMETRYGAUSS V25R12 vs GAUSS V30R4 JUST FIRST PAD SELECTED Simone Brusa, INFN sezione di Ferrara

More Related