html5-img
1 / 24

Encapsulation of Food Antioxidants as Potential Functional Food Ingredients

Encapsulation of Food Antioxidants as Potential Functional Food Ingredients. Amyl Ghanem Ph.D. P.Eng . Chemical Engineering Dalhousie University. Health benefits of plant polyphenols.

calla
Download Presentation

Encapsulation of Food Antioxidants as Potential Functional Food Ingredients

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Encapsulation of Food Antioxidants as Potential Functional Food Ingredients Amyl Ghanem Ph.D. P.Eng. Chemical Engineering Dalhousie University

  2. Health benefits of plant polyphenols • Plant polyphenols possess a high spectrum of antioxidant, anti inflammatory anti bacterial and antiviral functions. • Research suggests that plant polyphenols can slow the progression of certain cancers, reduce risk of cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative disease, diabetes, osteoporosis etc.

  3. Challenges • Concentrations that are effective in vitro are often an order of magnitude higher than in vivo. • Low bioavailability of polyphenols • small proportion of the molecules ingested orally actually make it into bloodstream • short gastric residence time, low solubility/permeability in the gut or degradation due to enzymes, pH etc. in the GI tract. • Instability of molecules during food processing and storage • degradation due to exposure to light, oxygen, temperature.

  4. “Microencapsulation*” Technically the formation of a wall material around a core/active material to make a capsule, on the scale of 1-1000 microns. However this term has come to encompass “entrapment” as well, Which includes the distribution of the core/active material within a matrix: wall matrix Core/active active • Objective: • Protect the core/active material from degradation in storage, processing or • active conditions • Improve bioavailability, cell uptake of core/active material • Act as a slow release reservoir • Improve solubility of core/active material • target delivery of core/active material to a specific location *Nanoencapsulation applies similarly to a nano-size range

  5. Encapsulate or entrap plant extracts in microparticles/nanoparticles • Achieve high concentration of active molecules in small volume. • Matrix material would stabilize polyphenols during storage and processing. • Matrix material could be used to improve bioavailability. • Applications exist in food, pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries. • Aim for particle size range < 30 mm or even lower not affect texture or clarity.

  6. My background:Entrapment of molecules for Drug Delivery Systems • Purpose: to understand • and manipulate the fate • of drugs in humans. • Controlled release • Tissue targeting Aicello Japan Designed to release drug in the small intestine

  7. Encapsulation Methods • Spray drying • Widely used in the Food Industry • Common wall materials: • Modified starch • Maltodextrin • Gum Arabic • Spherical particles • 10-100 mm • Limitations: wall materials, high T

  8. Freeze-Drying • Dehydration process good for heat sensitive materials • Active material and matrix material in solution • Results in powder of “uncertain form” • Great potential to combine with other methods Cloudberry extract with Maltodextin Lane et al, Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2008:11251-11261

  9. Ionic interactions: Coacervation, Gelation • Gel in solution deposits around the active ingredient which is suspended • Gelatin • Calcium alginate • Chitosan • Considered expensive but does not involve high temperatures or solvents. • Control sizes from nano to micron sized Active molecule + matrix material Counter ion solution Microcapsules withentrapped active molecule

  10. -Liposomes • Lipid bilayer membrane encapsulating • an aqueous phase • Formed from phospholipids utilizing hydrophobic/hydrophilic interactions • Formed by: thin film evaporation, sonication, reverse phase evaporation, • melting, freeze thawing, extrusion • A lot of literature on this technique • Shown to improve bioavailability and targeting • Often low entrapment efficiency and loading • Rapid release of active material • Can be improved by coatings

  11. Fang and Bandhari, Trends in Food Science and Technology 21(2010) 510-523

  12. Inclusion Complex • Using cyclodextrin as an encapsulating material • Hydrophobic/hydrophilic areas helps to improve the water solubility of molecules. • Emulsification • Active material dispersed into matrix/wall material • emulsified and cooled; Or • evaporation of internal phase • Lipids, hydrophilic polymers such as gelatin, glucan or agarose • Thermal gelation • Supercritical fluid • Combinations of techniques, crosslinking, coatings etc.

  13. Fang and Bandhari, Trends in Food Science and Technology 21(2010) 510-523

  14. My background:Entrapment of molecules for Drug Delivery Systems • Matrix material: chitosan • Active material • BSA (sample protein) • Glucose oxidase (sample enzyme) • Cladribine, adenosine (nucleotides, anticancer drug) • bFGF (growth factor) • Methods: • Complex coacervation of CH and TPP • Crosslinking with gluteraldehyde, glyoxal, genipin)

  15. Unmodified chitosan loaded with 100 ng of bFGF 87,000 x magnification (157 nm  23) N-succinyl Chitosan, unloaded, dried Magnification 16,500 × (642 nm  90) Chitosan Nanoparticles (CH NP) Unmodified, unloaded CH Nanoparticles (112 nm 13)

  16. Particle Properties • Sizes: Microparticles and Nanoparticles • 100-150 nm when dried (swell to 500 nm) • Smooth spherical morphology • Some aggregation observed • Good loading efficiencies • 70% for cladribine (anticancer drug) • 50% for bFGF (growth factor) • Can manipulate to modify behaviour • Crosslinking (ionic, glyoxal, genipin) • Modification (N-succinyl chitosan)

  17. Controlled Release Overall release from crosslinkedCladribine-loaded nanoparticles into PBS, pH 7.4. No entrapment Domaratzki, A and Ghanem, A. Journal Applied Polymer Science 2013, 128: 2173–2179

  18. bFGF release from nanoparticles into PBS, pH 7.4 chitosan N succinyl chitosan +heparin

  19. Examples of Polyphenol Entrapment

  20. Encapsulation of anthocyanin extract from jabuticabaand storage stability Extracts by supercritical CO2, compared storage conditions of 3 systems at 14 days: Both encapsulated systems were more stable under light and temperature Santos et al, Food Research International, 2013:617-624

  21. Spray drying of blueberry extract • Freeze dried blueberry, and blueberry pomace extracted into acetone (A), ethanol (E) or methanol (M) • Spray dried with whey protein or gum arabic • Subjected to in vitro digestion model No comparison to Free extract However they did show that WPI preserved antioxidant activity during simulated digestion Flores et al, Food Chemistry, 2014:272-278

  22. Possible applications to Haskap • Currently investigating extraction of blueberry polyphenols and encapsulation by spray drying and freeze drying • Steps: what concentration can be achieved in the extract? • Recommend a combination of methods to achieve high entrapment, stability and bioavailability • Main variables would include material(s), extraction method for polyphenols, encapsulation • Encapsulation facilities • spray drying, freeze drying, liposome formation, coacervation

  23. References • Encapsulation of Natural Polyphenolic Compounds: A Review. Munin, A. and Edwards-Levy, F. Pharmaceutics. 2011:793-829. • Encapsulation of Polyphenol- a Review. Fang, Z and Bhandari, B. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2010:510-523.

More Related