1 / 8

Readout Issues for the TPC/HBD Detector

Readout Issues for the TPC/HBD Detector. Craig Woody BNL. FEM/DAQ Upgrade Meeting October 24, 2002. PHENIX Central Region. Prime Real Estate ( accepting applications now). Detectors Proposed for the Inner Central Region. Silicon Vertex and Tracking Detectors

cale
Download Presentation

Readout Issues for the TPC/HBD Detector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Readout Issues for the TPC/HBD Detector Craig Woody BNL FEM/DAQ Upgrade Meeting October 24, 2002

  2. PHENIX Central Region Prime Real Estate (accepting applications now) C.Woody, FEM/DAQ Upgrade Meeting, 10/24/02

  3. Detectors Proposed for the Inner Central Region • Silicon Vertex and Tracking Detectors • Barrel pixel detector (~1.5M chs) • Endcap pixel detectors (~4.0 M chs) • Strip detector (~165K chs) • TPC/HBD • TPC (~80K chs) • HBD (4-5K chs) • NTC’ • Nose Cone Calorimeter (?) • Issues • Space • Power & cooling • Cables & fibers • Affect on other PHENIX detectors • Radiation length budget • Backgrounds for Muon Arms • Access and installation • Schedule C.Woody, FEM/DAQ Upgrade Meeting, 10/24/02

  4. Electronics and Readout Issues for TPC/HBD • HBD • - Need to define segmentation of readout plane, gas gain,… • (  number of channels, electronic gain, input capacitance, noise,…) • - New ASIC or hybrid electronics ? • - Must be low mass (sits in main part of PHENIX acceptance) • TPC • - Low power ADC • - Analog memory vs direct digitization • - Sampling rate (20-25 ns), dynamic range (8-10 bits) • - Data volume (zero suppression) • - Optical links (1 Gbit  160 fibers, higher speed fibers,…) • Interface to PHENIX DAQ and trigger • - New DCMs • - Impact on Event Builder, trigger, etc. C.Woody, FEM/DAQ Upgrade Meeting, 10/24/02

  5. HBD Readout Parameters Pad size: ~ 2 cm radius (r = 1.68 cm hexagons) Channel count: ~ 4-5 K (8x70x58/7.3=4430) Occupancy: ~ 20% for central Au+Au (w/4 layers of 1% Xo Si) • Main Question • How much of the readout electronics do we • put on the back of the readout plane ? • PS/SA only (  4-5K signal cables, • FEMs on edge of detector) • Full digitization (requires custom ASIC) Simulation by S. Milov - Central HIJING C.Woody, FEM/DAQ Upgrade Meeting, 10/24/02

  6. Data Volume and Readout Speed for TPC Number of channels Aplane = p (552 - 202) = 8247 cm2 Apad = 1.0 x 0.2 = 0.2 cm2 Npad = 8247/0.2 = 41,233 x 2 = ~ 80K chs Readout Speed in PHENIX Buffer size < 40 beam clock ticks 40 x 100 ns (10 MHz) = 4 msec (EMCAL pushes this to 6.4 msec) Readout time < 40 msec (25 KHz in DCM) 800 Kb => 6.4 x 106 bits/40 x 10-6 sec = 1.6 x 1011 bits/sec = 160 Gbits/sec (20 Gb/sec) => 160 1Gbit fibers (TEC has 128) => 40 DCMs (TEC has 28) Data Volume 4 msec/20 ns => 200 time samples (8 bits) 80K x 200b ~ 16 Mb Assume zero suppression of 1/20 => 800 Kb (actual hit rate gives 80 Kb => 1/200) Trigger Expect actual trigger rate in pp to be ~104 Hz at L = 2 x 1032 (trigger rate of interesting events including W,Z,charm is only ~ 103 Hz) If data volume after final zero suppression is 80 Kb, then 80 Kb x 104/sec => 800 Mb/sec => need Level 3 trigger C.Woody, FEM/DAQ Upgrade Meeting, 10/24/02

  7. Options for TPC Readout AMU + ADC readout Direct ADC readout To be discussed in Chi’s talk… C.Woody, FEM/DAQ Upgrade Meeting, 10/24/02

  8. T.Frawley UGW 5/7/02 Rates for Vector Mesons AuxAu Min. Bias: dN(p0)/dy=80, dN(r0)/dy=16, r0 -> e+e- = 4.5x10-5 PHENIX acceptance for f-> e+e- ~ 3.5% (assume same for r0) N(r0) = 2.5 x 10-5 per min bias event 240 mb-1 => 1.74x109 min. bias events => N(r0) = 44,000 (c.f. 8,000 J/y) Archive rate: 60 MB/s, 20% m.b.,180 kB/m.b. evt => 66 Hz m.b. archive rate 8 weeks at 25% overall duty factor => 8x107 m.b. events => N(r0) = 2000 Assume Level 2 trigger using HBD => 8 kHz to EvB 8 weeks at 25% overall duty factor => 9.7x109 events to EvB => N(r0) = 240,000 With Level 1 trigger -> 7x1010 m.b.events => N(r0) = 1.74x106 Not Enough Better Best C.Woody, FEM/DAQ Upgrade Meeting, 10/24/02

More Related