1 / 7

Red Herring - using misleading or unrelated evidence to support a conclusion

Red Herring - using misleading or unrelated evidence to support a conclusion. By: Skyla Robbins & Caitlin Ramsey. Universal example. In the holocaust, people were scared of Jews because they were told that if you came around the Jews that they’d kidnap your children. Act 1 Page 172.

caldwell-beasley
Download Presentation

Red Herring - using misleading or unrelated evidence to support a conclusion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Red Herring- using misleading or unrelated evidence to support a conclusion By: Skyla Robbins & Caitlin Ramsey

  2. Universal example • In the holocaust, people were scared of Jews because they were told that if you came around the Jews that they’d kidnap your children.

  3. Act 1 Page 172 • Parris: Now, Goody Ann, they only thought that there was a witch, and I am certain there be no element of witchcraft here. • Putnam: no witchcraft! Now look you, mr. Parris- • Parris: Thomas, Thomas, I Pray you, leap not to witchcraft. I know that you- you least of all, Thomas, would ever wish so disastrous a charge laid upon me we connect leap to witchcraft. They will haul me out of Salem for corruption in my house.

  4. Explanation • In this quote Parris and Putnum are discussing why Betty was seen flying. It is the red herring fallacy because Betty tried to jump out the window so they concluded that she must have been possessed by a witch. The conclusion they came to was not related to the situation.

  5. Act 2 Page 202 • Proctor: Poppets • Elizabeth: I never kept no poppets, not since I were a girl. • Cheever: I spy a poppet, Goody Proctor.

  6. Explanation • In this quote a poppet was discovered in Proctors house. This is the red herring fallacy because they accused Proctor of being a witch just because they found a poppet in her house.

  7. citations

More Related