200 likes | 212 Views
Explore the characteristics of high-performing and dysfunctional teams, including team development stages, group structure, conflict management, and decision-making. Learn how to create a strong foundation of trust and overcome the five dysfunctions of a team.
E N D
High Performing or Dysfunctional: How Healthy is Your Team? September 2013
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly • Think about your best team experience – sports, school, social organization • What made it great? • Now think of the worst team • Why was it so bad?
What Is a Team? • Groups whose members work intensely on a specific common goal using their positive synergy, individual and mutual accountability, and complementary skills.
Tuckman’s Stages of Team Development • Forming stage - the first stage of group development in which people join the group and then define the group’s purpose, structure, and leadership • Storming stage - the second stage of group development, characterized by intragroup conflict • Norming stage - the third stage of group development, characterized by close relationships and cohesiveness. • Performing stage - the fourth stage of group development when the group is fully functional and works on group task. • Adjourning - the final stage of group development for temporary groups during which group members are concerned with wrapping up activities rather than task performance.
Group Structure • Role - behavior patterns expected of someone occupying a given position in a social unit. • Norms - standards or expectations that are accepted and shared by a group’s members. • Groupthink - when a group exerts extensive pressure on an individual to align his or her opinion with that of others. • Status - a prestige grading, position, or rank within a group. • Social loafing- the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually. • Group cohesiveness - the degree to which group members are attracted to one another and share the group’s goals
Conflict Management Conflict- perceived incompatible differences that result opposition • Traditional view of conflict - the view that all conflict is bad and must be avoided.
Functional Conflict • Conflicts that support a group’s goals and improve its performance. • Task conflict - conflicts over content and goals of the work. • Process conflict - conflict over how work gets done.
Dysfunctional Conflict • Dysfunctional conflicts - conflicts that prevent a group from achieving its goals(typically interpersonal)
So, Is Conflict Always a Bad Thing? Clearly Not
Relationship Between Level of Conflict and Level of Performance
Five Conflict-Handling Styles • Avoiding - “Maybe the problem will go away” • Accommodating – “Let’s do it your way” • Forcing – “You have to do it my way” • Compromising – “Let’s split the difference” • Collaborating – “Let’s cooperate to reach a win-win solution that benefits both of us”
Programmed Conflict • Devil’s advocacy • process of assigning someone to play the role of critic to voice possible objections to a proposal and thereby generate critical thinking and reality testing • Dialectic method • process of having two people or groups play opposing roles in a debate in order to better understand a proposal
Trust is the Foundation • Emotional Bank Account