1 / 11

Team 2 : Yusuf Akkoca Tom Bloom Karen Delton Shweta Hire Eric Johnson David Mahzonni

Integrated Project Delivery at Autodesk, Inc. (A). Team 2 : Yusuf Akkoca Tom Bloom Karen Delton Shweta Hire Eric Johnson David Mahzonni. Experience it before it is real ™. Autodesk, Inc. Autodesk, Inc. Integrated Project Delivery Contract Terms: No Litigation.

caia
Download Presentation

Team 2 : Yusuf Akkoca Tom Bloom Karen Delton Shweta Hire Eric Johnson David Mahzonni

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrated Project Delivery at Autodesk, Inc. (A) Team 2: Yusuf Akkoca Tom Bloom Karen Delton Shweta Hire Eric Johnson David Mahzonni

  2. Experience it before it is real™ Autodesk, Inc.

  3. Autodesk, Inc.

  4. Integrated Project DeliveryContract Terms: No Litigation. Why do we litigate? Cost overruns/Where is my money? Schedule lateness/time pressures Quality problems Lack of communication Risks appearing How do we avoid litigation…stay tuned….

  5. Advantages: Establish Costs Early Risk Is Shared Between Parties Early Involvement Of All Parties Collaborative Decision Making More Creative Decisions Schedule is set and project completed quickly Not As Many Surprises Shared Profits Motivate Collaboration Integrated Project DeliveryContract Terms: No Litigation.

  6. Advantages: Ideal for owner Most qualified person does a task--leads to fewer problems Everyone knows costs and profits Less waste--better resource utilization Goals are defined/shared--less litigation Integrated Project DeliveryContract Terms: No Litigation.

  7. Disadvantages: Taking on partners’ risks Disputes become political Aligning operational definitions, i.e. define negligence Many companies will not enter a no litigation contract Subjective Integrated Project DeliveryContract Terms: No Litigation.

  8. Behavioral Consequences: “Success in IDP is 10% technology, 90% sociology” - Tocci Most qualified person performs function regardless of traditional roles Group decisions with expert opinions Integrated Project DeliveryContract Terms: No litigation.

  9. Focus of Team: Working towards shared goals Less waste is created because of compensation structure Less rework because team works together—leads to lower costs Integrated Project DeliveryContract Terms: No litigation.

  10. Challenges: Convince the lawyers representing companies Finding subcontractors to cooperate Finding trustworthy partners (contractors, designers, etc.) Integrated Project DeliveryContract Terms: No litigation.

  11. Differences with DBB, DB: Roles more clearly defined More surprises Lack of communication between designer and contractor Designer is done when plans and specs delivered Contractor and owner run project Ensures fairness to potential bidder Objective award Focus on deliverables Integrated Project DeliveryContract Terms: No litigation.

More Related