Attachment of bacteriophages MS2 and ΦX174 onto kaolinite and montmorillonite: extended-DLVO interactions. Constantinos V. Chrysikopoulos and Vasiliki I. Syngouna Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Patras 26500, Greece. EGU2012-1317.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Attachment of bacteriophages MS2 and ΦX174 onto kaolinite and montmorillonite: extended-DLVO interactions
Constantinos V. Chrysikopoulos and Vasiliki I. Syngouna
Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Patras 26500, Greece.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study aims to gain insights into the interaction of virus particles with clay colloids. Bacteriophages MS2 and ΦX174 were used as model viruses and kaolinite (KGa-1b) and montmorillonite (STx-1b) as model colloids. The experimental data obtained from batch experiments of MS2 and ΦX174 attachment onto KGa-1b and STx-1b suggested that virus attachment is adequately described by the Freundlich isotherm equation. Both MS2 and ΦX174 were attached in greater amounts onto KGa-1b than STx-1b. Furthermore, theoretical interaction energy calculations suggested that electrostatic as well as Lewis acid-base interactions are of vital importance in the attachment of viruses onto clay colloids.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MS2: an F-specific single-stranded RNA phage with effective particle diameter ranging from 24 to 26 nm
ΦX174: a somatic single-stranded DNA phage with effective particle diameter ranging from 25 to 27 nm
Kaolinite (KGa-1b): a well-crystallized kaolin from Washington County, Georgia Montmorillonite (STx-1b): a Ca-rich montmorillonite, white, from Gonzales County, Texas
The <2 μm clay colloidal fraction was separated by sedimentation and then was purified. The optical density of the clay colloids was analyzed at a wavelength of 280 nm by a UV-vis spectrophotometer. Using calibration curves, each measured KGa-1b absorbance was converted to KGa-1b concentration and each measured STx-1b absorbance was converted to STx-1b concentration.
Figure 4.Inactivation of (a) MS2, and (b) ΦX174 in the presence of KGa-1b (circles), STx-1b (squares), and control data in the absence of clays (diamonds).
The experimental data from the equilibrium attachment experiments of MS2 and ΦX174 onto KGa-1b and STx-1b are shown in Figure 5, and they were fitted with a Freundlich type isotherm:
The greater the value of Kf, the higher the affinity of viruses for clay minerals.
Table 1. Freundlich isotherm parameter values
Figure 6. Predicted DLVO interaction energy profiles for (a) MS2 with KGa-1b, (b) ΦX174 with KGa-1b, (c) MS2 with STx-1b, and (d) ΦX174 with STx-1b as a function of separation distance for the experimental conditions, using both sphere-plate and sphere-sphere approximations.
†EDS analysis (this study)
‡van Olphen and Fripiat (1979)
Figure 7. Predicted sphere-plate ΦDLVO, ΦAB, and ΦXDLVO interaction energy profiles for (a) MS2 and KGa-1b, (b) MS2 and STx-1b, (c) ΦX174 and KGa-1b, and (d) ΦX174 and STx-1b as a function of separation distance, for the experimental conditions.
Virus-clay colloid interactions
1. Classical DLVO theory (Loveland et al.,1996)
2. Extended DLVO theory (Bergendahl and Grasso,1999)
sphere-plate (van Oss,1994)
sphere-sphere (van Oss and Giese, 2004)
( Yoon et al., 1997)
Contact angles: MS2=331, X174=261.7 (Attinti et al., 2010)
KGa-1b=46.1, STx-1=20.52.8 (Wu, 2001)
Figure 1. Concentration calibration curves for (a) KGa-1b, and (b) STx-1b.
Figure 5. Freundlich isotherms for the attachment of (a) ΦX174 onto KGa-1b, (b) MS2 onto KGa-1b, (c) ΦX174 onto STx-1b, and (d) MS2 onto STx-1b at pH 7.0 and 25oC.
Calculations of virus-clay interactions
Table 2. Calculated max1,, min1, and min2 values for sphere-plate and sphere-sphere models using DLVO and XDLVO theories and the experimental conditions (pH=7, Is=10-4 M).
†No primary minimum depth, min1 can be calculated.
Figure 3. Definition sketch of the interaction energy between two approaching surfaces versus their separation distance, showing the primary minimum, min1 (deep energy "well"), the primary maximum, max1 (energy barrier to attachment and detachment), and the secondary minimum, min2 (shallow energy "well"), and the minimum separation distance ho.
This research has been co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund – ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program "Education and Lifelong Learning" of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) - Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund.
Figure 2.Scanning electron micrographs of (a) KGa-1b, and (b) STx-1b.