1 / 15

Schedulability-Driven Frame Packing for Multi-Cluster Distributed Embedded Systems

Schedulability-Driven Frame Packing for Multi-Cluster Distributed Embedded Systems. Paul Pop, Petru Eles, Zebo Peng Embedded Systems Lab (ESLAB) Linköping University, Sweden. Distributed Heterogeneous System. NoCs. Factory Systems. Heterogeneous Networks Multi-Cluster Systems.

Download Presentation

Schedulability-Driven Frame Packing for Multi-Cluster Distributed Embedded Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Schedulability-Driven Frame Packing for Multi-Cluster Distributed Embedded Systems Paul Pop, Petru Eles, Zebo PengEmbedded Systems Lab (ESLAB)Linköping University, Sweden

  2. Distributed Heterogeneous System NoCs ... ... ... ... ... Factory Systems Heterogeneous NetworksMulti-Cluster Systems Automotive Electronics Heterogeneous Networks

  3. ... • Applications distributed over the heterogeneous networks • Reduce costs:use resources efficiently • Requirements:close to sensors/actuators Gateway ... • Applications distributed over heterogeneous networks are difficult to... • Analyze(e.g., guaranteeing timing constraints) • Design (e.g., efficient implementation) Unsolvedproblems Distributed Safety-Critical Applications

  4. Contributions • Design optimization • Several design problems can be addressed once an analysis is available. • Analysis and design of Multi-Cluster Embedded Systems • Analysis and design of Multi-Cluster Embedded Systems • Analysis • Proposed a schedulability analysis for safety-critical hard real-time applications mapped on multi-cluster distributed embedded systems • Is the application schedulable? (Are deadlines satisfied?) • Bounds on the communication delays and communication buffer sizes • Design optimization • In this paper we have addressed the issue of packing application messages into frames (frame packing) for • Improving the degree of schedulability of an application • Reducing the hardware costs needed to run a schedulable application

  5. Outline • Motivation • Contributions • System architecture and application model • Related work • Schedulability analysis for multi-clusters • Frame packing for multi-custers • Experimental results • Message and future work

  6. ... Time-triggered cluster • Static cyclic scheduling • Time-triggered protocol Gateway ... Event-triggered cluster • Fixed priority preemptive scheduling • Controller area network protocol Time Triggered Protocol (TTP) • Bus access scheme: time-division multiple-access (TDMA) • Schedule table located in each TTP controller: message descriptor list (MEDL) Controller Area Network (CAN) • Priority bus, collision avoidance • Highest priority message wins the contention • Priorities encoded in the frame identifier S0 S1 S2 SG S0 S1 S2 SG Slot TDMA Round Cycle of two rounds Hardware Architecture

  7. ... ... m3 m1 m1 m2 m3 Software Architecture Gateway Time-triggered cluster NG N2 N1 CPU CPU CPU CPU CAN Controller CAN Controller P1 P4 OutCAN OutTTP OutN2 T T P2 P3 MBI MBI TTP Controller TTP Controller Event-triggered cluster SG S1 SG S1 Round2

  8. Related Work • Frame packing for TT systems using TTP • H. Kopez, R. Nossal, The Cluster-Compiler – A Tool for the Design of TimeTriggered Real-Time Systems, Workshop on Languages, Compilers,and Toolsfor Real-Time Systems, 1995 • Frame packing for ET sytems using CAN • K. Sandström, C. Norström, Frame Packing in Real-Time Communication,Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications Conference, 2000 • A. Rajnak, K. Tindell, L. Casparsson, Volcano Communications Concept,Volcano Communication Technologies AB, 1998 • Frame packing for multi-clusters (ET + TT) • Has not been addressed previously • Cannot be solved separately for each cluster asinter-cluster communication creates a circular dependency

  9. ... ... Application: set of process graphs Mapping Architecture: Multi-cluster Problem Formulation • Input • An application modeled as a set of process graphs • Each process has an worst case execution time, a period, and a deadline • Each message has a known size • The system architecture and the mapping of the application are given • Output • Worst-case response times • A mapping of application messages to frames (frame packing) such that the application is schedulable • Mapping of ET messages to frames • Priorities for ET messages • Mapping of TT messages to frames • TDMA slot sequence

  10. Response times depend on the communication delay between sending and receiving a message • Communication delays depend on the type of message passing • TTCTTC • TTCETC • ETCETC • ETCTTC • Communication delays • Bounds on the buffer sizes Schedulability Analysis • Scheduling time-triggered activities: • Building a schedule table: static cyclic scheduling (e.g., list scheduling) • Scheduling event-triggered activities: • Response time analysis: calculate worst case response times for each process • Schedulability test: response times smaller than the deadlines

  11. Multi-Cluster Scheduling • Scheduling cannot be addressed separately for each type of cluster • The inter-cluster communication creates a circular dependency: • TTC static schedules (offsets)  ETC response times • ETC response times  TTC schedule table construction Application, Mapping,Architecture TT Bus Configuration Priorities Offsetearliest possible start time for an event-triggered activity ResponseTimes ResponseTimeAnalysis StaticScheduling Offsets Multi-Cluster Scheduling ScheduleTables Responsetimes Boundson thebuffer sizes

  12. ... ... TTC TTC TTC TTP TTP TTP Gateway Gateway Gateway CAN CAN CAN ETC ETC ETC m1 and m2 packed in f1,m3 and m4 not packed,deadline missed m1 and m2 packed in f1,m3 and m4 packed in f2,deadline met Frame Packing Example deadline Messages not packeddeadline missed

  13. Frame Packing Optimization Strategies • Simulated Annealing • Based on a simulated annealing approach • Cost function: degree of schedulability • Obtains near-optimal values for the degree of schedulability • OptimizeFramePacking • Based on a greedy approach • Cost function: degree of schedulability • Straightforward solution • Finds a schedulable application • Does not consider the packing of messages to frames

  14. OptimizeFramePacking Can We Improve Schedulability? Cost function: degree of schedulability 100 StraightforwardsolutionDoes not perform optimizations 80 60 Average Percentage Deviation [%] OptimizeFramePacking? 40 20 0 Simulated AnnealingNear-optimal values for the degree of schedulability 80 160 240 320 400 Number of processes

  15. Message and Future Work • Future Work • Explore more design problems • Mapping for multi-clusters • How to partition an application in ET and TT activities? Analysis and optimization methods areneeded for the efficient implementation of applications distributed over interconnectedheterogeneous networks.

More Related