1 / 26

13 th Dec. 2004

PRESENTATION TO STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENERGY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF APDRP. 13 th Dec. 2004. WELCOME. MEMBERS STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENERGY. Power Development in India. 112058 MW. Capacity MW. 1712 MW. Ratio. THE PROBLEMS. Skewed tariff structure leading to unsustainable cross subsidy.

butch
Download Presentation

13 th Dec. 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PRESENTATION TO STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENERGY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF APDRP 13th Dec. 2004

  2. WELCOME MEMBERS STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENERGY

  3. Power Development in India 112058 MW Capacity MW 1712 MW

  4. Ratio

  5. THE PROBLEMS • Skewed tariff structure leading to unsustainable cross subsidy. • losses per annum 33,000 Crore i.e 1.5% GDP & may increase to 1,00,000 Crore per annum if proper steps are not taken • Huge T&D losses, largely due to outright theft and unmetered supply (around 20,000 Cr. annually) • Gap between cost of supply and average tariff is high • High LT/HT line ratio • Overloaded DT/Lines • Poor quality/unreliable power • Lack of accountability in distribution setup of SEBs • Unaccountability at feeder level

  6. THE PROBLEMS Old and poor distribution network leading to frequent outages and poor quality / unreliable power Poor return to utilities affecting their viability and capability to invest Lack of private investment in power distribution sector Poor billing 51% power generated billed and 41% realized Difference between Average Cost of Supply & Average Revenue Realization is around 110 paisa / unit

  7. Distribution Reforms aimed at • System up gradation of Sub transmission and distribution • Loss reduction (Technical & Commercial) • Theft control through increased vigilance & Legislation • Consumer satisfaction Approach • Profit centre approach • Decentralized generation in rural areas • Focus on Concentrated Zones • IT initiatives to replace human intervention DISTRIBUTION REFORMS

  8. DISTRIBUTION REFORMS(contd..) Parameters to be monitored • Revenue realisation v/s Energy input • Reliability Index • AT&C loss • Productivity (Energy handled per employee)

  9. APDRP • With a focus on distribution reforms Govt. of India approved APDRP Scheme • The following initiatives have been undertaken for bringing about commercial viability of SEB/Utility • Administrative Intervention • 11kV feeder as Profit Centre • SE designated as CEO • JE designated as feeder manager • Technical Intervention • 100% metering (tamper proof) • Installation of capacitor at all levels • Computerization of billing • Re-configuration of feeder lines & DTs • Commercial Intervention • Energy meters on DTs & Consumers and energy accounting • Energy Audit and Accounting at all levels • Energy meters on feeders

  10. APDRP • Accelerated Power Development and Reform Programme as a Six level Intervention Strategy for distribution reforms to • Reduce AT&C losses • Bring about commercial viability in the power sector • Reduce outages & interruptions • Increase consumer satisfaction TIME FRAME 4 YEARS (TENTH PLAN PERIOD) • Expected outlay of Rs. 40,000 Crore as additional central plan assistance to State Governments during Tenth five year plan. • Rs. 20,000 Crore for strengthening & up gradation of sub-transmission and distribution networks under INVESTMENT COMPONENT. • Rs. 20,000 Crore grant to the states for reduction in the cash loss by the SEBs/Utilities under INCENTIVE COMPONENT. • Initially the focus is on high-density networks i.e. urban centers where investment could lead to substantial, quick & demonstrable results.

  11. INVESTMENT COMPONENT • Projects for strengthening and up gradation of ST&D network are sanctioned for reduction in losses & outages and better reliability & increased customer satisfaction • Projects sanctioned:Rs. 14710.74 Cr.(02-03) Rs. 1899.43 Cr. (03-04) Rs. 1008.92 Cr.(04-05) Total: Rs. 17619.09 Cr. • Funds released:Rs.1755.51 Cr.(’02-’03) Rs. 2356.51 (’03-’04) Rs. 4112.01 Cr. Total • C/Part funds tied up:Rs. 6233.92 Cr. • C/Part funds drawn:Rs. 2044.99 Cr. • Funds Utilised:Rs.4762.18 Cr.

  12. ELIGIBILITY FOR AVAILING APDRP FUND • States to sign MOU: Achieved by all • States to sign MOA: Achieved by all • States to sign TPA: Achieved by all • States not to default in payment of CPSUs dues

  13. ELIGIBILITY FOR AVAILING APDRP FUND (PRIVATE AGENCIES) • To Sign MOA with state Govt. • State should agree before sanction of project and for recovery of loan • Private agencies to inform assistance under APDRP including grants-in-aid along with quantifiable benefits expected from such investments to the SERC to ensure additional benefits are passed on to the consumers over and above what DISCOMs are obliged to, under extant agreements/order of the regulator. Private agencies are not eligible for incentive as incentive is built in their taking over agreements with State Govt. • State Govt. to monitor progress of work and conditionalities committed under MOA.

  14. INVESTMENT COMPONENT DISBURSEMENT(Figures Rs. in Crore)

  15. INVESTMENT COMPONENT DISBURSEMENT (Figures Rs. in Crore)

  16. INVESTMENT COMPONENT DISBURSEMENT TO PRIVATE COMPANIES • *All DISCOMs are private. • N.B.: Not eligible for Incentive Component

  17. INCENTIVE • This component has been introduced to motivate the SEBs/Utilities to reduce their financial losses. Funds are provided to SEBs/utilities for actual cash loss reduction by way of one for two matching grants. FY 2000-01 has been fixed as base year • M/S CARE appointed to review the incentive claims • Incentive and amount released:(Rs. in Crore) State Released Released Released (02-03)(03-04) (04-05) Andhra Pradesh 265.105 Gujarat 236.37 Haryana 5.01 100.48 Maharashtra 137.89 Rajasthan 137.71 West Bengal 73.00 Total 379.27 503.30 73.00 Total: Rs.955.58 Cr. • Incentive claims for year 2002-03 of Assam, Gujarat, Karnataka, Kerala, Goa, Maharashtra and M.P. are under scrutiny

  18. STATUS • METERING • 100% feeder metering completed in 15 states and 2 states have achieved more than 90% metering. (Overall 95% against 81.32% during 2001) • 100% consumer metering completed in 4 states and 9 states have achieved more than 90% metering. (Overall 87% against 77.6% during 2001) Contd..

  19. States have reported reduction in Financial Losses as shown below. (Rs. In Crore) Source: SEB Accounts

  20. FINANCIAL LOSSES OF SEBs (Without SUBSIDY)

  21. States have reported reduction in AT&C Losses as shown below. (In Percentage) Source: CARE

  22. Source: CARE

  23. States have reported reduction in Revenue Gap (ACS-ARR) as shown below. (Fig in Rs./Unit) Source: CARE

  24. Source: CARE

  25. STATUS • Energy accounting started • Consumer indexing started in A.P, Delhi, Gujarat, Karnataka, M.P., Maharashtra, Punjab, Rajasthan & U.P. • Feeder managers identified by states for increased accountability, which is helping in reduction of AT&C losses • Computerised billing and consumer care centres in selected towns of A.P., Delhi, Gujarat, H.P., Karnataka, Maharashtra, M.P. Tamilnadu, U.P. & West Bengal • Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, West Bengal, Noida power Company have introduced High Voltage Distribution System for arresting power pilferage • Assam, Andhra, Gujarat, Karnataka, Nagaland & Orissa have started handing over parts of distribution networks to franchises

  26. Thanks

More Related