1 / 25

Emergency Relief for Federally Owned Roads (ERFO)

Emergency Relief for Federally Owned Roads (ERFO). Objective for Today. Program Basics Betterments Funding and Stewardship Q & A. ERFO Authorization. Title 23 U.S.C., Section 125 Authorizes both the ER and ERFO Programs Title 23, CFR, Part 668 – Emergency Relief Program

buffy
Download Presentation

Emergency Relief for Federally Owned Roads (ERFO)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emergency Relief for Federally Owned Roads (ERFO)

  2. Objective for Today • Program Basics • Betterments • Funding and Stewardship • Q & A

  3. ERFO Authorization • Title 23 U.S.C., Section 125 • Authorizes both the ER and ERFO Programs • Title 23, CFR, Part 668 – Emergency Relief Program • Subpart A - Procedures for Federal-Aid Highways (ER) • Subpart B – Procedures for Federal Agencies for Federal Roads (ERFO)

  4. ERFO Program Intent • The intent of the program is to • repair or reconstruct Federally owned or designated roads • that have suffered serious damage • by a natural disaster over a wide area • or by a catastrophic failure

  5. When Disaster Strikes • Initiate Emergency Repairs • Restore essential traffic • Protect remaining facilities • Prevent additional damage • Maintain eligibility for reimbursement • Keep records, time sheets, equipment hours • TAKE PICTURES

  6. Notify • Phone call to FLMA ERFO Coordinator • Regional Office • Assesses damage from all units • Informal Notice of Intent (NOI) • Formal NOI to FLH Division Engineer within 2 weeks of event • NOI sent later than 6 weeks may be rejected

  7. Disaster Assessment • ERFO Coordinator and Applicant prepare a Disaster Assessment Report • ERFO Coordinator makes recommendation • FLH Division Engineer makes final determination (Positive or Negative Finding)

  8. Disaster Assessment • Eligible Roads, Bridges and Trails • Roads & Bridges : Open to Public Travel (Passenger Car) • Trails: National Trails • Damage to the Facility must be beyond Heavy Maintenance • Pictures

  9. Disaster Approval Criteria • Natural event: Unusual, Sudden, and unprecedented • Widespread Area: Several Counties or Presidential or Governor Disaster Declaration • Serious: $700,000 ( Combined)/$3,000

  10. Program of Projects Approval • Applicant and FHWA conducts detailed site inspections and prepares DSRs • Applicant submits their Program of Projects (POP) Letter and submits DSRs for review • FHWA sends Approved POP Letter which establishes the list of approved projects and any approval conditions • Required prior to beginning Permanent Repairs

  11. Project Progress • Applicant tracks progress through a Disaster Repair Status/Closeout Report • Project Timeline • Force Account Repairs – completed by the end of the second fiscal year following the disaster • Contract Repairs – awarded by the end of the second fiscal year following the disaster

  12. Disaster Closeout • Applicant submits Final Disaster Repair Status/Closeout Report • ERFO Coordinator prepares Closeout Letter and Report • May conduct in-depth review of selected projects • ERFO Program Manager reconciles funds with the Applicant

  13. SOME IMPORTANT POINTS

  14. ERFOEmergency Repairs • Categorically Excluded (Cat. Ex.) from the need to prepare an EA or EIS under FHWA’s NEPA implementing regulations (23CFR 771.117(c)(9)) • A Categorical Exclusion must be prepared

  15. ERFOPermanent Repairs • Program approval required before permanent repairs begin • Environmental compliance and permits are the responsibility of the lead agency • Projects must be given prompt attention and priority over non-emergency work

  16. Permanent RepairProject Timing and Priority • Projects not completed within the time period must be granted a time extension to remain eligible • Time Extensions evaluated as follows: • Project advanced on a priority basis? • Another disaster enlarged the damage? • Significant environmental or public involvement? • On-going litigation?

  17. Permanent RepairProject Timing and Priority • Time extensions will not be granted for: • Lack of agency or ERFO funds • Force Account projects • Submit time extension requests 60 days prior to the end of the eligibility period • Time extensions are needed on an annual basis until the project is under construction

  18. Withdrawn from theProgram of Projects • Projects not completed timely and projects without time extensions are no longer considered emergency projects • Only costs expended during the eligible period are reimbursable

  19. REVISED DSR • The cost variance (estimated to actual) is more than $20,000 for Damage Survey Reports less than $100,000. • The cost variance (estimated to actual) is more than 20 percent for Damage Survey Reports over $100,000. • Scope of Repairs Change

  20. ERFO STATUS REPORTS • One Status Report each year • Actual obligation/expenditure for each site • Disaster Closeout Process • In-depth review of selected sites • Closeout Report • Funds reconciliation

  21. BETTERMENTS

  22. Betterment Definition • Added features or facilities NOT existing prior to the Natural Disaster or Catastrophic Failure • Replacement Facilities are not considered betterments • Project mitigation measures are not considered betterments

  23. Betterment Examples • Betterments that may be justifiable • Adding scour protection • Replacing a culvert with a bridge • Lengthening or raising bridges • Raising road grade • Deepening channels • Increasing number or size of culvert

  24. Betterment Examples • Betterments that would be difficult to justify • Adding lanes, widening shoulders • Upgrading a surface from gravel to ACP • High cost items when current damage is minimal

  25. Betterment Eligibility • Betterment justification must be through a Benefit/Cost analysis • Submit proposal to the ERFO Coordinator for approval

More Related