1 / 24

Interactive Boards

Interactive Boards. From Transmission to Transformative Learning: Using Interactive Boards to Transform Teaching and Learning. Diallo Sessoms, Ph.D. Instructional Technology Salisbury University. Objectives. You will be able to… Create differentiated lessons

bryony
Download Presentation

Interactive Boards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Interactive Boards From Transmission to Transformative Learning: Using Interactive Boards to Transform Teaching and Learning Diallo Sessoms, Ph.D. Instructional Technology Salisbury University

  2. Objectives You will be able to… Create differentiated lessons Think interactively about lessons Understand implications for integrating IB Locate & link interactive, web-based resources

  3. Introduction

  4. What are your impressions?

  5. Conceptual Framework • Transformation • Learning theory: Constructivist? • Intersection between students, teachers, and technology

  6. IB Use • Early adopter • Develop philosophy • Access technologies • Willingness to change • Community of practice

  7. Levels of Use Supported didactic Use only as visual support Interactive Challenge pupils to think by using a variety of verbal, visual and aesthetic stimuli Enhanced Interactive Change of thinking and uses IB as an integral part of teaching Integrates concept and cognitive development

  8. Why Interactive Boards? Potential transformation (Burden, 2002) Influence learning process (Cradler,McNabb, & Burchett, 2002) Sharing work helps students articulate their ideas and give explanations (Levy, 2002) Awareness of preferred learning styles (Miller, Glover, & Averis, 2005) Intersection between technical and pedagogic interactivity(Smith, 2005)

  9. Teacher Interactivity • Implement virtual tools • Manipulation of objects • Create & implement • Provides students with feedback & graphic representation of difficult concepts • Classroom movement – not stuck at front

  10. Student Interactivity • Asking questions • Explain processes • Create/present knowledge • Explore interactive content

  11. Differentiation with the IB • Changing pace, level or kind of instruction • Create multiple options for… Taking in information Making sense of ideas Expressing what they learn (Tomlinson, 2001)

  12. Classroom Actions

  13. Teacher Actions

  14. Student Actions

  15. Teacher/Student Interaction

  16. Active Classrooms

  17. Developing an IB lesson • Analyze the degree of challenge and variety in your current instructional plans • Modify, adapt, or design new approaches to instruction in response to student’s needs, interests, and learning preferences

  18. Developing an IB lesson 1. Content Learning Objectives Content Interaction Student Demonstrations 2. Process Teacher/Student Actions Teacher-student Interaction Access (resources & content)

  19. Developing an IB lesson 3. Product Demonstrate knowledge Visual/spatial/kinesthetic 4. Relative Advantage Enhanced Lesson or Add-on Accessing Resources 5. Assessment Formative Informal [Affects the speed of learning]

  20. Resources • Smarttech • Tangrams • Student Needs • Virtual Manipulatives • Smartboard Resources • Differentiated Instruction Handouts

  21. References Burden, K. (2002). Learning from the Bottom Up - the contribution of school based practice and research in the effective use of interactive whiteboards for the FE/HE sector. Learning and Skills Research - Making an Impact Regionally Conference, The Earth Centre, Doncaster. Cradler, J.,McNabb, M, & Burchett, R. (2002). How does technology influence student learning? Learning and Leading with Technology,29(8) 46-49, 56. Levy, P. (2002). Interactive Whiteboards in Learning and Teaching in Two Sheffield Schools: a developmental study, www.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards. Miller, D., Glover, D., & Averis, D. (2005). Developing pedagogic skills for the use of the interactive whiteboard in mathematics. Retrieved June 2006 from Keele Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Centre for Learning and Teaching, School of Education Communication and Language Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Tomlison, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .

  22. LINKS • Tangramshttp://standards.nctm.org/document/eexamples/chap4/4.4/index.htm • Smarttech http://smarttech.com/ • Student Needshttp://www.education.ucsb.edu/netshare/tepinst/ed391h/html/studentneeds.html • Virtual Manipulatives http://nlvm.usu.edu/en/nav/topic_t_3.html • Smart Board Resources http://www.theteachersguide.com/SmartBoards.htm • Differentiation http://www.k8accesscenter.org/online_community_area/DifferentiatedInstructionHandouts.asp

  23. QUESTIONS

More Related