1 / 17

Aeroelastic effects

Aeroelastic effects. Wind loading and structural response Lecture 14 Dr. J.D. Holmes. Aeroelastic effects. Very flexible dynamically wind-sensitive structures . Motion of the structure generates aerodynamic forces. Positive aerodynamic damping : reduces vibrations - steel lattice towers .

brook
Download Presentation

Aeroelastic effects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Aeroelastic effects Wind loading and structural response Lecture 14 Dr. J.D. Holmes

  2. Aeroelastic effects • Very flexible dynamically wind-sensitive structures • Motion of the structure generates aerodynamic forces • Positive aerodynamic damping : reduces vibrations - steel lattice towers • if forces act in direction to increase the motion : aerodynamic instability

  3. Aeroelastic effects • Example : Tacoma Narrows Bridge WA - 1940 • Example : ‘Galloping’ of iced-up transmission lines

  4. Consider a body moving with velocity in a flow of speed U Relative velocity of air with respect to body = Aeroelastic effects • Aerodynamic damping (along wind) :

  5. transfer to left hand side of equation of motion : for small total damping term : aerodynamic damping term Aeroelastic effects • Aerodynamic damping (along wind) : Drag force (per unit length) = along-wind aerodynamic damping is positive

  6. From vector diagram : Aeroelastic effects • Galloping : galloping is a form of aerodynamic instability caused by negative aerodynamic damping in the cross wind direction Motion of body in z direction will generate an apparent reduction in angle of attack, 

  7. Fz = D sin  + L cos  = Aeroelastic effects • Galloping : Aerodynamic force per unit length in z direction (body axes) : (Lecture 8) For  = 0 :

  8. Substituting, For , Fz is positive - acts in same direction as Aeroelastic effects • Galloping : negative aerodynamic damping when transposed to left-hand side

  9. Aeroelastic effects • Galloping : den Hartog’s Criterion critical wind speed for galloping,Ucrit , occurs when total damping is zero Since c = 2(mk)=4mn1 (Figure 5.5 in book) m = mass per unit length n1 = first mode natural frequency

  10. Aeroelastic effects • Galloping : Cross sections prone to galloping : Square section (zero angle of attack) D-shaped cross section iced-up transmission line or guy cable

  11. Consider a two dimensional body rotating with angular velocity Apparent change in angle of attack : Vertical velocity at leading edge : Aeroelastic effects • Flutter : Can generate a cross-wind force and a moment Aerodynamic instabilities involving rotation are called ‘flutter’

  12. Flutter derivatives Aeroelastic effects • Flutter : General equations of motion for body free to rotate and translate : per unit mass per unit mass moment of inertia

  13. Aeroelastic effects • Flutter : Types of instabilities :

  14. U/nd U/nd unstable 2 4 6 0 10 8 12 A1* 3 0 stable stable 2 2 -2 1 1 -4 1 1 2 0 H1* -6 0 10 4 6 2 8 12 H2* 0.4 A2* 8 2 0.3 6 1 0.2 4 2 2 2 0.1 0 0 A -2 -0.1 -0.2 1 Aeroelastic effects • Flutter : Flutter derivatives for two bridge deck sections :

  15. Aeroelastic effects • Flutter : Determination of critical flutter speed for long-span bridges: • Empirical formula (e.g. Selberg) • Experimental determination (wind-tunnel model) • Theoretical analysis using flutter derivatives obtained experimentally

  16. Aeroelastic effects • Lock - in : Motion-induced forces during vibration caused by vortex shedding Frequency ‘locks-in’ to frequency of vibration Strength of forces and correlation length increased

  17. End of Lecture 14John Holmes225-405-3789 JHolmes@lsu.edu

More Related