1 / 15

Resolving Disagreements: Logical Conflict Analysis

Explore the logic of disagreement and relationships of claims in conflict or agreement scenarios. Learn how claims can coexist or contradict based on logical principles.

brock
Download Presentation

Resolving Disagreements: Logical Conflict Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Logical Conflict The Logic of Disagreement

  2. Relationships of Claims NOT IN LOGICAL CONFLICT: Claims are not in logical conflict if they COULD be true at the same time. Note that it is not necessary that they actually be true at the same time.

  3. Relationships of Claims NOT IN LOGICAL CONFLICT: Claims are not in logical conflict if they COULD be true at the same time. Note that it is not necessary that they actually be true at the same time. IN LOGICAL CONFLICT: Claims are in logical conflict if they COULD NOT be true at the same time. If claims are in logical conflict, it is necessary that at least one of them be false.

  4. Claims that are not in conflict: Claims are not in conflict if they COULD be true at the same time.

  5. Claims that are not in conflict: Claims are not in conflict if they COULD be true at the same time. a) Washington was the first President of the U.S. b) Jefferson was the third President of the U.S.

  6. Claims that are not in conflict: Claims are not in conflict if they COULD be true at the same time. a) Washington was the first President of the U.S. b) Jefferson was the third President of the U.S. a) It’s over 60 degrees today. b) It’s over 80 degrees today.

  7. Claims that are not in conflict: Claims are not in conflict if they COULD be true at the same time. a) Washington was the first President of the U.S. b) Jefferson was the third President of the U.S. a) It’s over 60 degrees today. b) It’s over 80 degrees today. a) Arnold is a politician. b) Arnold is an actor.

  8. Claims that are in conflict: Claims are in conflict if they COULD NOT be true at the same time.

  9. Claims that are in conflict: Claims are in conflict if they COULD NOT be true at the same time. a) Washington was the first President of the U.S. b) Jefferson was the first President of the U.S.

  10. Claims that are in conflict: Claims are in conflict if they COULD NOT be true at the same time. a) Washington was the first President of the U.S. b) Jefferson was the first President of the U.S. a) It’s over 60 degrees now. b) It’s 60 degrees or cooler now.

  11. Claims that are in conflict: Claims are not in conflict if they COULD be true at the same time. a) Washington was the first President of the U.S. b) Jefferson was the first President of the U.S. a) It’s over 60 degrees now. b) It’s 60 degrees or cooler now. a) Arnold is a politician. b) Arnold is not a politician.

  12. Determining Logical Conflict

  13. Especially about Contraries The “all-or-nothing” pattern a) Everybody cares about taxes. b) Nobody cares about taxes

  14. Especially about Contraries The “all-or-nothing” pattern a) Everybody cares about taxes. b) Nobody cares about taxes The false dilemma Either we drive across the country or we fly.

  15. Especially about Contraries The “all-or-nothing” pattern a) Everybody cares about taxes. b) Nobody cares about taxes The false dilemma Either we drive across the country or we fly. Perfectionism If we can’t do it perfectly, we won’t do it at all.

More Related