E N D
1. ???Elsevier???????
2. ?? 1. ????
2. EES???????
3. ??????
4.??????????
5.?????Elsevier
3. 1.????
4. ????
5. ????
6. 2.EES???????
7. Elsevier?????? Elsevier Editorial System (EES),??????????????????????
EES ??:
?????????????
????????
???/??????????
????????
?????????
??????
????,?????
8. ????-????
9. ????: ScienceDirect / ????
10. ???? & ????
11. ??EES?? http://ees.elsevier.com/acronym/
12. ???????/??
13. ????
14. ??????????
15. ???????PDF??
16. ???? View Submission?????????PDF??????
??Ethics in Publishing
??Approve Submission
17. ??????
18. ????
19. 3.??????
20. ??????
21. ?????? ?????(reference number )
http://authors.elsevier.com/TrackPaper.html
???(Acknowledgement Letter)
1. ????/???????
2. ?????(Offprint Order)
3. ????
22. ???????
23. ?????? Digital Object Identifier (DOI) http://dx.doi.org
24. ???(Offprint) ???????
????? (water-marked PDF)
???? 400?
?? sciencereprints@elsevier.com
25. 4.??????????
26. Elsevier?????????????: The submissions to Elsevier from China is nearly as many as those from USA!!The submissions to Elsevier from China is nearly as many as those from USA!!
27. ????????:??????? (1) ??:
?????????????????
??????????
?????????
?? (???Guide for authors??????)
????;??, ??????;??,????;????
?????????????
??+?? ???
28. ??,??????/???
??????????
?????????????
?????, ??????????
????????????????
??????/??
?????; ?????????
???
??????????????
????????:??????? (2)
29. ???
30. ?????????: ???? (scope and prestige)
????????
??????? (??/??)
????????
??????
???????? (??/??/????) Salami: authors should not slice one article up into several very similar articles, in order to get a longer publication list. Salami: authors should not slice one article up into several very similar articles, in order to get a longer publication list.
31. ???? ????:
???????
????
????
????
32. ????????,????????
?????????,?????????????
????????,????????
?????????,?????????????
33. ??????????????:
34. What gets you accepted? Attention to details
Check and double check your work
Consider the reviews
English must be as good as possible
Presentation is important
Take your time with revision
Acknowledge those who have helped you
New, original and previously unpublished
Critically evaluate your own manuscript
Ethical rules must be obeyed
Nigel John Cook, Editor-in-Chief, Ore Geology Reviews Nigel CookNigel Cook
35. 5.?????Elsevier
36. ?????Elsevier? ????????
?????EES??
?????????????
???????????????
ScienceDirect
Scirus
Scopus
Embase.com
37. Questions