1 / 19

New Publishing and the Semantic Web

New Publishing and the Semantic Web. Building an Open Publishing Architecture Mid-Year Postgraduate Research Conference 2006 School Of Global Studies Social Science & Planning, RMIT University Liam Magee and Gus Gollings. Background.

brett-nolan
Download Presentation

New Publishing and the Semantic Web

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New Publishing and the Semantic Web Building an Open Publishing Architecture Mid-Year Postgraduate Research Conference 2006School Of Global Studies Social Science & Planning, RMIT University Liam Magee and Gus Gollings

  2. Background ARC Linkage Project – impact of new technologies on publishing Partners: RMIT, Australian Government, FujiXerox Gus and Liam – researchers, doing PhD’s on technology, information, classification systems and society… One aspect of research – impact of new technologies on information communities (producers, brokers and consumers of information) Hypothesis of an information architecture for new publishing –‘Open Publishing Architecture’

  3. Building an Open Publishing Architecture To define a case for open document publishing - basic form of infrastructure for: • individuals • corporations • communities • government To construct a high-level architecture that supplies: • longevity • openness • metadata capacity across the publishing activities

  4. The Argument and Philosophy Publishing is an important social practice: formalizing and firming ideas. It is currently in the hands of gatekeepers. It is largely agnostic of new technological horizons. Can publishing really be open? Simply using open documents format itself might limit innovation, for the standard constrains functionality?

  5. Threats to ‘Open Information’ in a Digital Age Cost of participation in digital content creation Regulation / control of content production (content creation tools) Regulation / control of content distribution (historical consolidation of publishers) Regulation / control of content consumption (search engines, browsers, devices)

  6. Threats to ‘Open Information’ in a Digital Age Obsolescence of content Interoperability of content and content descriptions (metadata) Endless replication of digital divide – superceded technologies ‘trickle down’ to developing communities Perceived dilution of quality from ‘mass vanity publishing’ (blogging) Loss of historicity of textual production with digital production / reproduction

  7. What do we mean by ‘Architecture’? ‘Architecture’ as metaphor – used to describe both: • an information system • a technology system That is, how information is created, transmitted, aggregated, edited, composed, retrieved, presented, disseminated (social practices)… And what technical mechanisms are used to accomplish this (technical practices)… Project straddles social and computer sciences…

  8. Building an Open Publishing Architecture Holy trinity of: • standards (language constraints), • social practice (how you do it), • tools (software/hardware) Anyone is free to pursue this architecture: • companies • communities • individuals • 3rd party operators

  9. Arriving at an Open Publishing Architecture History: By looking back at how publishing and knowledge management has been organized in the past and present Technology: By looking at the technological horizons for extensive networked computers

  10. History: Publishing & Knowledge Mastery Desire to Know Everything • Aristotle's argument with Plato: that knowledge is empirical not abstract. • Massive documentation projects from the past: Aquinas, Diderot, Samual Johnson Dictionary, Project Gutenberg, "Thesaurus Linguae Graecae”, "Thesaurus Linguae Latinae”, Buddhist Pali Canon, Emperor's Library and Chinese Classics

  11. History: Publishing & Knowledge Mastery • Paul Otlet, 1935 Man would no longer need documentation if he were assimilated into an omniscient being - as with God himself. But to a less ultimate degree, a technology will be created acting at a distance and combining radio, X-rays, cinema and microscopic photography. Everything in the universe, and everything of man, would be registered at a distance as it was produced. In this way a moving image of the world will be established, a true mirror of his memory. From a distance, everyone will be able to read text, enlarged and limited to the desired subject, projected on an individual screen. In this way, everyone from his armchair will be able to contemplate creation, as a whole or in certain of its parts. (p. 390)

  12. History: Publishing & Knowledge Mastery Tim Berners-Lee and Robert Cailliau:1992-4 World Wide Web As we experience it today, the internet is crashing into one billion fixed line users.

  13. Technology: Network Transmission Web has attracted spectacular amount of content Managing that content is hard (problems which Google tackles) Another approach to answering these problems is an arcane technology the Semantic Web

  14. Technology: Network Transmission Semantic Web is: …is an extension of the current web, where information is given well defined meaning …enables people and computers to work in cooperation …where the current web is a web of pages, the Semantic Web is a web of data

  15. Technology: Network Transmission Current World Wide Web has HTML to markup its pages Semantic Web has markup technologies of its own, which allow for the computer readable descriptions of the relationships between things

  16. Technology: Network Transmission Whereasthe Existing Web simply defines ‘links to’ generic resources, the Semantic Web specifies the meaning of the relationships between, and the nature of, resources.

  17. What does an architecture look like? Document: blueprints for a digital publishing environment: Description of business processes – best practices Outline of components – tools for content creation, management, archival, recomposition, distribution Recommendations for standards

  18. Goals of an Architecture (‘SCAM’ Principles) Content data, and data about content (metadata) to be transparent and human-readable (Principle of Standardisation) Ease, low-cost and replaceable components (Principle of Commoditisation) Content to be storable and retrievable (Principle of Archivability) Content to be editable (Principle of Manipulation)

  19. Building an Open Publishing Architecture Questions: • Fledgling theory (ready to be shot down…) • Architecture – necessary metaphor? (connotations of ‘weighty’, ‘unweildy’, ‘top-heavy’) • Is this a critical problem (or a solution in search of a problem)? • How will such an architecture be devised? Disseminated? Implemented? Monitored?

More Related