1 / 10

Urban Mobility Plan in Ile de France EMTA General meeting 27th april 2009

Urban Mobility Plan in Ile de France EMTA General meeting 27th april 2009. Urban mobility plans : a legal requirement. 1996 : law on ‘Air quality and rational use of energy’

Download Presentation

Urban Mobility Plan in Ile de France EMTA General meeting 27th april 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Urban Mobility Plan in Ile de France EMTA General meeting 27th april 2009

  2. Urban mobility plans : a legal requirement • 1996 : law on ‘Air quality and rational use of energy’ • All urban areas of more than 100,000 inhabitants must elaborate an urban mobility plan (Plan de déplacement urbain - PDU) • Main objectives of these plans: • Reducing motorized traffic • Developing public transport and all other modes of transport which are environmentally friendly • Adapting main roads network in order to enhance its efficiency and its use by all modes of transport • Organizing public parking provision • Organizing freight transport and goods delivery in order to reduce impact on road traffic and environment • Promoting staff’s mobility management for companies and public administrations • Public transport authorities are in charge of the elaboration of the plan • The Plans must be evaluated within 5 years • Revision if necessary

  3. The Urban Mobility Plan in Ile-de-France • The law makes an exception for the Franch Region ‘Ile de France’: the plan applies to the whole region • The first plan was designed by the State • together with the regional council, STIF, the city of Paris • in association with other local authorities, transport operators, interest groups • Adopted at the end of 2000 after a public consultation • Since the French ‘Décentralisation’ law (2004) : STIF is responsible for the evaluation and the revision of the Plan on behalf of the regional council • The plan is eventually approved by the regional council and requires the agreement of the national state

  4. The governance of the 2000 Mobility Plan : its main weaknesses • After 6 years of implementation • Only a few of the planned actions have been achieved • Some projects have been stopped because of the disruption in state financing • Consultative process takes much more time than expected • The Plan was elaborated at the regional level but many of its provisions are to be implemented at the local level • Difficulty of appropriation by French territorial communities • Problem of coordination between different levels of French territorial communities

  5. Region Départements Municipalities State STIF Public transport Public parking Delivery of goods Roads Sharing out of responsibilities Different actors are responsible for planning, at different levels: • State, Region, Département, Built-up (metropolitan) Area, Town Plans are linked to legal compatibility requirements

  6. Political management STIF’s Transport Supply Committee Technical management Technical Committee STIF, RIF, Départements, State Partners Committee Thematic Partners Committee Public Transport Thematic Partners Committee Individual motorized modes Thematic Partners Committee Alternative modes of transport Thematic Partners Committee Goods Technical experts groups Revision of the Regional Urban Mobility Plan:a development and consultative process aiming at making the keyplayers involved A consultation at all levels: • those who will approve the plan • those who will have their say about the plan • those who will implement it • people at large An involvement of the elected representatives in the process

  7. The consultative processfrom May 2009 until March 2010 Tools for debate Partner’scomitySeminar - Diagnosis Power point diagnosis Forum Preparation May to July Doc. Diagnosis and stakes (1st version) Partner’scomitySeminar Stakes and consultation Meeting of the associations Free contributions Internet Appealed contributions Towns and PDU partners Accompanied contributions : youth, districts, 2-wheelmotorizedvehicles, car and peri-urban workshops Questionnaire adapted to the context Contributions Sept. / Oct. Doc. Diagnosis and stakes (1st version) + avenues of action + synthesis of the contributions Départements seminar 4 seminars Productive systems Day of the towns and local governments Debates Nov. / Dec. Partner’scomitySeminar Synthesis of the consultation White Paper about the consultation Synthesis Jan. / March Completion of the PDU project

  8. Révision of the urban mobility plan: a technical elaboration process to identify pertinent actions Thematic work groups

  9. The stake of the Regional Urban Mobility Plan (RUMP) The stake of the RUMP is to ensure a sustainablebalance between the needs of mobility, the protection of environment and health and the financial needs. This balance shall facilitate the attractiveness of the French region ‘Ile-de-France’ and guarantee the social cohesion. Sustainable balance FINANCING MOBILITY ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, QUALITY OF LIFE Ensuring the mobilityneeds of people and goods:  According to the differentscales of mobility  For various motives  For all • Reducingenvironmental nuisances (pollution, greenhousegases, noise) • Improving road safety • Improving the quality of life • Controlling energy consumption and reducing the dependence on fossil fuels • Ensuring the financialsustainability • Identifying the sources of financing for all the actions of the RegionalUrbanMobility Plan (RUMP) whatever the scope • Looking for efficient measures • In order to ensurethis balance today and moreover in the future, we have to: • Change the mobility conditions • Change ourbehaviour 9

  10. The challenges of the RUMP to reduce road traffic and promote alternative modes of transport Changing the mobility conditions Changing ourbehaviour Acting on the urbanforms and urbandevelopment 1 Makingpublic transport more attractive 2 Convincing the key players and stimulating the will to act together 8 Restoringwalking as a major item in the mobilitychain 3 Giving a new lease of life to cycling 4 9 Arousingcitizensawareness Acting on the conditions of use of the individual motorized modes of transport 5 Making the wholemobilitychainaccessible 6 Those changes have to feed each other in order to take up the challenge of the RUMP Rationalizing the organisation of the goods flow and encouraging the modal transfer 7 10

More Related