1 / 22

The American Council on Pharmaceutical Education (ACPE)

The American Council on Pharmaceutical Education (ACPE). Library and Learning Resources Subcommittee Students Subcommittee Faculty Subcommittee Physical and Practice Facilities Subcommittee Financial Resources Subcommittee Curriculum Subcommittee

brand
Download Presentation

The American Council on Pharmaceutical Education (ACPE)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The American Council on Pharmaceutical Education (ACPE) • Library and Learning Resources Subcommittee • Students Subcommittee • Faculty Subcommittee • Physical and Practice Facilities Subcommittee • Financial Resources Subcommittee • Curriculum Subcommittee • Mission, Planning and Assessment Subcommittee • Organization and Administration Subcommittee • Self Study Parent Committee

  2. The American Council on Pharmaceutical Education (ACPE) Accreditation Survey Progress Target Group Respondents Response Rate ACPE Student Survey P1 (2008) 93 76.2% P2 (2007) 97 85.1% P3 (2006) 86 71.1% P4 (2005) 79 79.8% Overall 355 77.9% ACPE Faculty Survey* 43 100.0% ACPE Alumni Survey 47 15.1% ACPE Preceptor Survey1 26 14.0% Notes: * 100% response rate based on the participation of all full-time active faculty.

  3. The American Council on Pharmaceutical Education (ACPE)Standard No. 3. Systematic Assessment of AchievementStandard No. 13. Evaluation of Student AchievementStandard No. 14. Curriculum Evaluation

  4. Standard No. 3. Systematic Assessment of Achievement The College or School should show evidence of using analysis of outcome measures throughout the educational, research, service, and pharmacy practice programs, for purposes of continuing development and improvement, including revisions in curriculum, and modifications of faculty and student policies.

  5. Standard No. 13. Evaluation of Student Achievement The College or School of Pharmacy should establish principles and methods for the formative and summative evaluation of student achievement.

  6. Standard No. 14. Curriculum Evaluation Evaluation measures focusing on the efficacy of the curricular structure, content, process, and outcomes should be systematically and sequentially applied throughout the curriculum in pharmacy. Evidence should exist that evaluation outcomes, including student achievement data, are applied to modify or revise the professional program in pharmacy.

  7. Curricular AssessmentSurvey Breakdown Last Semesters P1 – P3 – Fall Semester Graduating Class P4 – Spring Semester Alumni – 1–3- 5 years out Early Assurance vs. PharmCAS applicants

  8. Curricular Survey SummaryGraduating Classes 2002-2004Degree of Preparedness

  9. Curricular AssessmentInterpretation of the Survey Findings Communication • The students feel they are moderately prepared for the communication skills pharmacists must have in their activities. They appear more confident to talk with patients versus other health care professionals. Pharmacotherapy and Patient Care • Students believe they are moderately prepared to recommend drug therapy and resolve medication related problems. Professional Practice • Students feel very positive in determining the legitimacy of a prescription, providing counseling to their patients, and devising methods to ensure patient adherence.

  10. Curricular AssessmentInterpretation of the Survey Findings Drug Information/Pharmacoinformatics • Students are very well prepared to collect information to prevent or resolve a medication related problem, respond to a request for information from another health care provider, and to respond to a patient’s request for information. Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Since 2002, student confidence in making reasonable assumptions and drawing reasonable conclusions when the data is incomplete has seemed to decrease. Pharmacy Management • This was consistently the area that students reported they were the least prepared to do upon graduation.

  11. Curricular AssessmentInterpretation of the Survey Findings Professional Ethics and the Health Care System • The student’s confidence in recognizing and explaining how social and cultural issues impact the health care environment has shown a decrease to moderate level of preparation since 2002. Leadership • For this question the student’s answered they feel only moderately prepared to assume a leadership role in community and professional matters.

  12. Overall Most Common Responses • Have a mandatory over the counter drug class • Have less paperwork in the P4 year • Need more information on pharmacist to patient interaction (perhaps tied into communication) • More on DME • Learn drugs before disease • Instructors seem to look down upon doing retail pharmacy when most students stated they plan on doing that. • Medical students are more knowledgeable about drugs and therapeutics in their 4th year then the Pharm. D. students are.

  13. Areas not covered in the Pharm.D. Curriculum • Anatomy • Herbals

  14. Courses that should be added to the Pharm.D. Curriculum • Insurance • Anatomy • Pathology • OTC’s • Pharmacy Management • More on Pharmacy Law

  15. Courses that should be deleted from the Pharm.D. Curriculum • Informatics • Pharmacogenetics/Pharmacogenomics • Pharmacoeconomics

  16. Endocrinology - 10/6/04 - 10/13/04 Angela Wisniewski Nicole Paolini Psychiatry - 10/19/04 -10/26/04 Terry Bellnier Drug & Alcohol - 10/19/04 - 10/26/04 AbuseGayle Brazeau ADHD - 10/19/04- 10/26/04 Karl Fiebelkorn Dermatology - 12/7/04 - 12/14/04 J Frederick Bennes Neurology - 12/7/04 - 12/14/04 Francis Gengo Gastrointestinal - 12/7/04 - 12/14/04 Timothy Bosinski Integrated Case Studies - 12/7/04 - 2/14/04 Patrick Smith Angela Wisniewski Nicole Paolini Course Evaluation - 12/07/04 - 12/14/04Patrick Smith Rotation Survey breaking out different specialties & instructors

  17. PHM 512 ADHD 78.18% CE 87.27% Drug & Alcohol Abuse 78.18% Dermatology 87.27% Endrocrinology 81.82% Neurology 87.27% GI 87.27% Integrated Case Studies 87.27% Psychiatry 78.18% Average 83.63% PHM 512 Neurology 93.4% Psychiatry/ADHD 79.1% Drug and Alcohol 62.6% Abuse / Gastroenterology Endocrinology 61.5% Dermatology/Course 58.2% Average 71.0% Rotation Survey breaking out different specialties & instructors Fall 2002 Fall 2004

  18. Fall 2003 & Fall 2004 • Back to Back comparisons

  19. On Deck • New Student Orientation • Admissions • Focus Groups • Peer to Peer • Exit Interviews

  20. Questions

More Related